Cargando…
The Effectiveness of Right- vs Left-lateral Starting Position in Unsedated Diagnostic Colonoscopy with Modified-water Immersion Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study
OBJECTIVE: A colonoscopy study in sedated patients with air insufflation showed that right-lateral starting position (RLP) improved abdominal discomfort and reduced cecal intubation time. The aim of this study was to determine if RLP vs left-lateral starting position (LLP) may produce similar result...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7522421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33061515 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S270793 |
_version_ | 1783588177358880768 |
---|---|
author | Bayupurnama, Putut Ratnasari, Neneng Indrarti, Fahmi Triwikatmani, Catharina Maduseno, Sutanto Nurdjanah, Siti W Leung, Felix |
author_facet | Bayupurnama, Putut Ratnasari, Neneng Indrarti, Fahmi Triwikatmani, Catharina Maduseno, Sutanto Nurdjanah, Siti W Leung, Felix |
author_sort | Bayupurnama, Putut |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: A colonoscopy study in sedated patients with air insufflation showed that right-lateral starting position (RLP) improved abdominal discomfort and reduced cecal intubation time. The aim of this study was to determine if RLP vs left-lateral starting position (LLP) may produce similar results in unsedated patients examined with a modified-water immersion (m-WI) method. METHODS: Consecutive patients for diagnostic colonoscopy meeting the inclusion criteria were randomized. Patients and colonoscopist were unblinded. The m-WI method entailed suction during insertion not only for fecal debris evacuation but also to facilitate passage through difficult or angulated colonic flexures. Water was infused as needed when any difficulty was encountered during insertion. A bowel visualization scale (BVS) (0=totally blurred visualization; 1=blurred lumen visualization; 2=small fecal debris with clear mucosa visualization; 3= clear visualization) was used to evaluate the interference of fecal debris with cecal intubation rate and time. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients (72 in RLP and 70 in LLP) were enrolled. The respective pain score, visual analog scale, (VAS) and cecal intubation rate were not significantly different. The cecal intubation time was nearly significantly different (13.4±4.5 min vs 11.7±5.4 min; p=0.054) and was significantly different in the constipation subgroup (16.0±3.5 min vs 8.6±3.8 min; p=0.001). The cecal intubation time based on BVS showed significant difference between RLP and LLP in Scale 2 (13.9±4.6 min vs 10.3±4.2 min; p=0.003) and Scale 2 and 3 combined (13.2±4.3 min vs 10.6±4.8 min; p=0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: RLP did not improve the pain score, and LLP showed better performance in unsedated m-WI colonoscopy patients (ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03489824). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7522421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75224212020-10-14 The Effectiveness of Right- vs Left-lateral Starting Position in Unsedated Diagnostic Colonoscopy with Modified-water Immersion Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Bayupurnama, Putut Ratnasari, Neneng Indrarti, Fahmi Triwikatmani, Catharina Maduseno, Sutanto Nurdjanah, Siti W Leung, Felix Clin Exp Gastroenterol Original Research OBJECTIVE: A colonoscopy study in sedated patients with air insufflation showed that right-lateral starting position (RLP) improved abdominal discomfort and reduced cecal intubation time. The aim of this study was to determine if RLP vs left-lateral starting position (LLP) may produce similar results in unsedated patients examined with a modified-water immersion (m-WI) method. METHODS: Consecutive patients for diagnostic colonoscopy meeting the inclusion criteria were randomized. Patients and colonoscopist were unblinded. The m-WI method entailed suction during insertion not only for fecal debris evacuation but also to facilitate passage through difficult or angulated colonic flexures. Water was infused as needed when any difficulty was encountered during insertion. A bowel visualization scale (BVS) (0=totally blurred visualization; 1=blurred lumen visualization; 2=small fecal debris with clear mucosa visualization; 3= clear visualization) was used to evaluate the interference of fecal debris with cecal intubation rate and time. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients (72 in RLP and 70 in LLP) were enrolled. The respective pain score, visual analog scale, (VAS) and cecal intubation rate were not significantly different. The cecal intubation time was nearly significantly different (13.4±4.5 min vs 11.7±5.4 min; p=0.054) and was significantly different in the constipation subgroup (16.0±3.5 min vs 8.6±3.8 min; p=0.001). The cecal intubation time based on BVS showed significant difference between RLP and LLP in Scale 2 (13.9±4.6 min vs 10.3±4.2 min; p=0.003) and Scale 2 and 3 combined (13.2±4.3 min vs 10.6±4.8 min; p=0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: RLP did not improve the pain score, and LLP showed better performance in unsedated m-WI colonoscopy patients (ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03489824). Dove 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7522421/ /pubmed/33061515 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S270793 Text en © 2020 Bayupurnama et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bayupurnama, Putut Ratnasari, Neneng Indrarti, Fahmi Triwikatmani, Catharina Maduseno, Sutanto Nurdjanah, Siti W Leung, Felix The Effectiveness of Right- vs Left-lateral Starting Position in Unsedated Diagnostic Colonoscopy with Modified-water Immersion Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study |
title | The Effectiveness of Right- vs Left-lateral Starting Position in Unsedated Diagnostic Colonoscopy with Modified-water Immersion Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study |
title_full | The Effectiveness of Right- vs Left-lateral Starting Position in Unsedated Diagnostic Colonoscopy with Modified-water Immersion Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study |
title_fullStr | The Effectiveness of Right- vs Left-lateral Starting Position in Unsedated Diagnostic Colonoscopy with Modified-water Immersion Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effectiveness of Right- vs Left-lateral Starting Position in Unsedated Diagnostic Colonoscopy with Modified-water Immersion Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study |
title_short | The Effectiveness of Right- vs Left-lateral Starting Position in Unsedated Diagnostic Colonoscopy with Modified-water Immersion Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study |
title_sort | effectiveness of right- vs left-lateral starting position in unsedated diagnostic colonoscopy with modified-water immersion method: a randomized controlled trial study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7522421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33061515 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S270793 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bayupurnamaputut theeffectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy AT ratnasarineneng theeffectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy AT indrartifahmi theeffectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy AT triwikatmanicatharina theeffectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy AT madusenosutanto theeffectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy AT nurdjanahsiti theeffectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy AT wleungfelix theeffectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy AT bayupurnamaputut effectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy AT ratnasarineneng effectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy AT indrartifahmi effectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy AT triwikatmanicatharina effectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy AT madusenosutanto effectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy AT nurdjanahsiti effectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy AT wleungfelix effectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy |