Cargando…

The Effectiveness of Right- vs Left-lateral Starting Position in Unsedated Diagnostic Colonoscopy with Modified-water Immersion Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study

OBJECTIVE: A colonoscopy study in sedated patients with air insufflation showed that right-lateral starting position (RLP) improved abdominal discomfort and reduced cecal intubation time. The aim of this study was to determine if RLP vs left-lateral starting position (LLP) may produce similar result...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bayupurnama, Putut, Ratnasari, Neneng, Indrarti, Fahmi, Triwikatmani, Catharina, Maduseno, Sutanto, Nurdjanah, Siti, W Leung, Felix
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7522421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33061515
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S270793
_version_ 1783588177358880768
author Bayupurnama, Putut
Ratnasari, Neneng
Indrarti, Fahmi
Triwikatmani, Catharina
Maduseno, Sutanto
Nurdjanah, Siti
W Leung, Felix
author_facet Bayupurnama, Putut
Ratnasari, Neneng
Indrarti, Fahmi
Triwikatmani, Catharina
Maduseno, Sutanto
Nurdjanah, Siti
W Leung, Felix
author_sort Bayupurnama, Putut
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A colonoscopy study in sedated patients with air insufflation showed that right-lateral starting position (RLP) improved abdominal discomfort and reduced cecal intubation time. The aim of this study was to determine if RLP vs left-lateral starting position (LLP) may produce similar results in unsedated patients examined with a modified-water immersion (m-WI) method. METHODS: Consecutive patients for diagnostic colonoscopy meeting the inclusion criteria were randomized. Patients and colonoscopist were unblinded. The m-WI method entailed suction during insertion not only for fecal debris evacuation but also to facilitate passage through difficult or angulated colonic flexures. Water was infused as needed when any difficulty was encountered during insertion. A bowel visualization scale (BVS) (0=totally blurred visualization; 1=blurred lumen visualization; 2=small fecal debris with clear mucosa visualization; 3= clear visualization) was used to evaluate the interference of fecal debris with cecal intubation rate and time. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients (72 in RLP and 70 in LLP) were enrolled. The respective pain score, visual analog scale, (VAS) and cecal intubation rate were not significantly different. The cecal intubation time was nearly significantly different (13.4±4.5 min vs 11.7±5.4 min; p=0.054) and was significantly different in the constipation subgroup (16.0±3.5 min vs 8.6±3.8 min; p=0.001). The cecal intubation time based on BVS showed significant difference between RLP and LLP in Scale 2 (13.9±4.6 min vs 10.3±4.2 min; p=0.003) and Scale 2 and 3 combined (13.2±4.3 min vs 10.6±4.8 min; p=0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: RLP did not improve the pain score, and LLP showed better performance in unsedated m-WI colonoscopy patients (ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03489824).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7522421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75224212020-10-14 The Effectiveness of Right- vs Left-lateral Starting Position in Unsedated Diagnostic Colonoscopy with Modified-water Immersion Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Bayupurnama, Putut Ratnasari, Neneng Indrarti, Fahmi Triwikatmani, Catharina Maduseno, Sutanto Nurdjanah, Siti W Leung, Felix Clin Exp Gastroenterol Original Research OBJECTIVE: A colonoscopy study in sedated patients with air insufflation showed that right-lateral starting position (RLP) improved abdominal discomfort and reduced cecal intubation time. The aim of this study was to determine if RLP vs left-lateral starting position (LLP) may produce similar results in unsedated patients examined with a modified-water immersion (m-WI) method. METHODS: Consecutive patients for diagnostic colonoscopy meeting the inclusion criteria were randomized. Patients and colonoscopist were unblinded. The m-WI method entailed suction during insertion not only for fecal debris evacuation but also to facilitate passage through difficult or angulated colonic flexures. Water was infused as needed when any difficulty was encountered during insertion. A bowel visualization scale (BVS) (0=totally blurred visualization; 1=blurred lumen visualization; 2=small fecal debris with clear mucosa visualization; 3= clear visualization) was used to evaluate the interference of fecal debris with cecal intubation rate and time. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients (72 in RLP and 70 in LLP) were enrolled. The respective pain score, visual analog scale, (VAS) and cecal intubation rate were not significantly different. The cecal intubation time was nearly significantly different (13.4±4.5 min vs 11.7±5.4 min; p=0.054) and was significantly different in the constipation subgroup (16.0±3.5 min vs 8.6±3.8 min; p=0.001). The cecal intubation time based on BVS showed significant difference between RLP and LLP in Scale 2 (13.9±4.6 min vs 10.3±4.2 min; p=0.003) and Scale 2 and 3 combined (13.2±4.3 min vs 10.6±4.8 min; p=0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: RLP did not improve the pain score, and LLP showed better performance in unsedated m-WI colonoscopy patients (ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03489824). Dove 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7522421/ /pubmed/33061515 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S270793 Text en © 2020 Bayupurnama et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Bayupurnama, Putut
Ratnasari, Neneng
Indrarti, Fahmi
Triwikatmani, Catharina
Maduseno, Sutanto
Nurdjanah, Siti
W Leung, Felix
The Effectiveness of Right- vs Left-lateral Starting Position in Unsedated Diagnostic Colonoscopy with Modified-water Immersion Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study
title The Effectiveness of Right- vs Left-lateral Starting Position in Unsedated Diagnostic Colonoscopy with Modified-water Immersion Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study
title_full The Effectiveness of Right- vs Left-lateral Starting Position in Unsedated Diagnostic Colonoscopy with Modified-water Immersion Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study
title_fullStr The Effectiveness of Right- vs Left-lateral Starting Position in Unsedated Diagnostic Colonoscopy with Modified-water Immersion Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study
title_full_unstemmed The Effectiveness of Right- vs Left-lateral Starting Position in Unsedated Diagnostic Colonoscopy with Modified-water Immersion Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study
title_short The Effectiveness of Right- vs Left-lateral Starting Position in Unsedated Diagnostic Colonoscopy with Modified-water Immersion Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study
title_sort effectiveness of right- vs left-lateral starting position in unsedated diagnostic colonoscopy with modified-water immersion method: a randomized controlled trial study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7522421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33061515
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S270793
work_keys_str_mv AT bayupurnamaputut theeffectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy
AT ratnasarineneng theeffectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy
AT indrartifahmi theeffectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy
AT triwikatmanicatharina theeffectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy
AT madusenosutanto theeffectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy
AT nurdjanahsiti theeffectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy
AT wleungfelix theeffectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy
AT bayupurnamaputut effectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy
AT ratnasarineneng effectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy
AT indrartifahmi effectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy
AT triwikatmanicatharina effectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy
AT madusenosutanto effectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy
AT nurdjanahsiti effectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy
AT wleungfelix effectivenessofrightvsleftlateralstartingpositioninunsedateddiagnosticcolonoscopywithmodifiedwaterimmersionmethodarandomizedcontrolledtrialstudy