Cargando…
An epidemiological study on COVID-19 should be carried out: With a serological test, a pharyngeal swab or both?
Autores principales: | Scalese, Marco, Sposato, Bruno |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7522694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33055004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2020.09.007 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Is wet swab superior to dry swab as an intranasal screening test?
por: Hagiya, Hideharu, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Comparable Specimen Collection from Both Ends of At-Home Midturbinate Swabs
por: Truong, Melissa, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Negative Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swabs Do Not Rule Out COVID-19
por: Winichakoon, Poramed, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Asymptomatic and symptomatic respiratory virus infection detected in naso-pharyngeal swabs from solid organ transplant recipients early after transplantation
por: BenMarzouk-Hidalgo, Omar J., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Why do children seem to be more protected against COVID-19? A hypothesis
por: Sposato, Bruno, et al.
Publicado: (2020)