Cargando…
The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in Slovakia and in Finland: one law, two different practices?
BACKGROUND: The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) was ratified in 2004 in Slovakia and in 2005 in Finland. The aim of this study was to compare the implementation of the FCTC in the national laws and policies regarding smoking in Finland and Slovakia. METHODS: In this case study the fol...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12914-020-00243-x |
_version_ | 1783588359736655872 |
---|---|
author | Pavlikova, Barbara van Dijk, Jitse P. |
author_facet | Pavlikova, Barbara van Dijk, Jitse P. |
author_sort | Pavlikova, Barbara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) was ratified in 2004 in Slovakia and in 2005 in Finland. The aim of this study was to compare the implementation of the FCTC in the national laws and policies regarding smoking in Finland and Slovakia. METHODS: In this case study the following areas are compared: the legal framework; the monitoring system and health promotion; treatment; and policies aimed at reducing tobacco consumption. We report on these in this order after a short historical introduction. RESULTS: The legal frameworks are similar in Slovakia and in Finland. Finland far exceeds the minimum legal requirements. Slovakian regulations reflect the FCTC requirements; however, social tolerance is very high. In Finland the monitoring system and health promotion are aimed more at tobacco consumption. Slovakia does not follow the surveillance plans recommended by WHO so strictly; often there are no current data available. No additional documents regarding the FCTC have been adopted in Slovakia. The financial contribution to treatment is very low. Slovakian tobacco control policy is more focused on repression than on prevention, in contrast to Finland. Smoking bans meet European standards. Excise duties rise regularly in both countries. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the FCTC is at different levels in the compared countries. Finland has a clear plan for achieving the goal of a smoking-free country. Slovakia meets only the minimum standard required for fulfillment of its international obligations. Its policy should become more transparent by making more up-to-date data available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7523304 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75233042020-09-30 The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in Slovakia and in Finland: one law, two different practices? Pavlikova, Barbara van Dijk, Jitse P. BMC Int Health Hum Rights Research Article BACKGROUND: The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) was ratified in 2004 in Slovakia and in 2005 in Finland. The aim of this study was to compare the implementation of the FCTC in the national laws and policies regarding smoking in Finland and Slovakia. METHODS: In this case study the following areas are compared: the legal framework; the monitoring system and health promotion; treatment; and policies aimed at reducing tobacco consumption. We report on these in this order after a short historical introduction. RESULTS: The legal frameworks are similar in Slovakia and in Finland. Finland far exceeds the minimum legal requirements. Slovakian regulations reflect the FCTC requirements; however, social tolerance is very high. In Finland the monitoring system and health promotion are aimed more at tobacco consumption. Slovakia does not follow the surveillance plans recommended by WHO so strictly; often there are no current data available. No additional documents regarding the FCTC have been adopted in Slovakia. The financial contribution to treatment is very low. Slovakian tobacco control policy is more focused on repression than on prevention, in contrast to Finland. Smoking bans meet European standards. Excise duties rise regularly in both countries. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the FCTC is at different levels in the compared countries. Finland has a clear plan for achieving the goal of a smoking-free country. Slovakia meets only the minimum standard required for fulfillment of its international obligations. Its policy should become more transparent by making more up-to-date data available. BioMed Central 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7523304/ /pubmed/32993626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12914-020-00243-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pavlikova, Barbara van Dijk, Jitse P. The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in Slovakia and in Finland: one law, two different practices? |
title | The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in Slovakia and in Finland: one law, two different practices? |
title_full | The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in Slovakia and in Finland: one law, two different practices? |
title_fullStr | The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in Slovakia and in Finland: one law, two different practices? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in Slovakia and in Finland: one law, two different practices? |
title_short | The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in Slovakia and in Finland: one law, two different practices? |
title_sort | framework convention on tobacco control in slovakia and in finland: one law, two different practices? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12914-020-00243-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pavlikovabarbara theframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolinslovakiaandinfinlandonelawtwodifferentpractices AT vandijkjitsep theframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolinslovakiaandinfinlandonelawtwodifferentpractices AT pavlikovabarbara frameworkconventionontobaccocontrolinslovakiaandinfinlandonelawtwodifferentpractices AT vandijkjitsep frameworkconventionontobaccocontrolinslovakiaandinfinlandonelawtwodifferentpractices |