Cargando…

The role of 3D printed models in the teaching of human anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an emerging technology widely used in medical education. However, its role in the teaching of human anatomy needs further evaluation. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, SpringerLink, and Nature databases were searched systematically for studies published f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Zhen, Dun, Aishe, Jiang, Hanming, Nie, Cuifang, Zhao, Shulian, Wang, Tao, Zhai, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02242-x
_version_ 1783588373989949440
author Ye, Zhen
Dun, Aishe
Jiang, Hanming
Nie, Cuifang
Zhao, Shulian
Wang, Tao
Zhai, Jing
author_facet Ye, Zhen
Dun, Aishe
Jiang, Hanming
Nie, Cuifang
Zhao, Shulian
Wang, Tao
Zhai, Jing
author_sort Ye, Zhen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an emerging technology widely used in medical education. However, its role in the teaching of human anatomy needs further evaluation. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, SpringerLink, and Nature databases were searched systematically for studies published from January 2011 to April 2020 in the English language. GRADEprofiler software was used to evaluate the quality of literature. In this study, a meta-analysis of continuous and binary data was conducted. Both descriptive and statistical analyses were used. RESULTS: Comparing the post-training tests in neuroanatomy, cardiac anatomy, and abdominal anatomy, the standardized mean difference (SMD) of the 3D group and the conventional group were 1.27, 0.37, and 2.01, respectively (p < 0.05). For 3D vs. cadaver and 3D vs. 2D, the SMD were 0.69 and 1.05, respectively (p < 0.05). For answering time, the SMD of the 3D group vs. conventional group was – 0.61 (P < 0.05). For 3D print usefulness, RR = 2.29(P < 0.05). Five of the six studies showed that satisfaction of the 3D group was higher than that of the conventional group. Two studies showed that accuracy of answering questions in the 3D group was higher than that in the conventional group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with students in the conventional group, those in the 3D printing group had advantages in accuracy and answering time. In the test of anatomical knowledge, the test results of students in the 3D group were not inferior (higher or equal) to those in the conventional group. The post-training test results of the 3D group were higher than those in the cadaver or 2D group. More students in the 3D printing group were satisfied with their learning compared with the conventional group. The results could be influenced by the quality of the randomized controlled trials. In a framework of ethical rigor, the application of the 3D printing model in human anatomy teaching is expected to grow further.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7523371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75233712020-09-30 The role of 3D printed models in the teaching of human anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ye, Zhen Dun, Aishe Jiang, Hanming Nie, Cuifang Zhao, Shulian Wang, Tao Zhai, Jing BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an emerging technology widely used in medical education. However, its role in the teaching of human anatomy needs further evaluation. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, SpringerLink, and Nature databases were searched systematically for studies published from January 2011 to April 2020 in the English language. GRADEprofiler software was used to evaluate the quality of literature. In this study, a meta-analysis of continuous and binary data was conducted. Both descriptive and statistical analyses were used. RESULTS: Comparing the post-training tests in neuroanatomy, cardiac anatomy, and abdominal anatomy, the standardized mean difference (SMD) of the 3D group and the conventional group were 1.27, 0.37, and 2.01, respectively (p < 0.05). For 3D vs. cadaver and 3D vs. 2D, the SMD were 0.69 and 1.05, respectively (p < 0.05). For answering time, the SMD of the 3D group vs. conventional group was – 0.61 (P < 0.05). For 3D print usefulness, RR = 2.29(P < 0.05). Five of the six studies showed that satisfaction of the 3D group was higher than that of the conventional group. Two studies showed that accuracy of answering questions in the 3D group was higher than that in the conventional group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with students in the conventional group, those in the 3D printing group had advantages in accuracy and answering time. In the test of anatomical knowledge, the test results of students in the 3D group were not inferior (higher or equal) to those in the conventional group. The post-training test results of the 3D group were higher than those in the cadaver or 2D group. More students in the 3D printing group were satisfied with their learning compared with the conventional group. The results could be influenced by the quality of the randomized controlled trials. In a framework of ethical rigor, the application of the 3D printing model in human anatomy teaching is expected to grow further. BioMed Central 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7523371/ /pubmed/32993608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02242-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ye, Zhen
Dun, Aishe
Jiang, Hanming
Nie, Cuifang
Zhao, Shulian
Wang, Tao
Zhai, Jing
The role of 3D printed models in the teaching of human anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The role of 3D printed models in the teaching of human anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The role of 3D printed models in the teaching of human anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The role of 3D printed models in the teaching of human anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The role of 3D printed models in the teaching of human anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The role of 3D printed models in the teaching of human anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort role of 3d printed models in the teaching of human anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02242-x
work_keys_str_mv AT yezhen theroleof3dprintedmodelsintheteachingofhumananatomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dunaishe theroleof3dprintedmodelsintheteachingofhumananatomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jianghanming theroleof3dprintedmodelsintheteachingofhumananatomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT niecuifang theroleof3dprintedmodelsintheteachingofhumananatomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoshulian theroleof3dprintedmodelsintheteachingofhumananatomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangtao theroleof3dprintedmodelsintheteachingofhumananatomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaijing theroleof3dprintedmodelsintheteachingofhumananatomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yezhen roleof3dprintedmodelsintheteachingofhumananatomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dunaishe roleof3dprintedmodelsintheteachingofhumananatomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jianghanming roleof3dprintedmodelsintheteachingofhumananatomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT niecuifang roleof3dprintedmodelsintheteachingofhumananatomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoshulian roleof3dprintedmodelsintheteachingofhumananatomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangtao roleof3dprintedmodelsintheteachingofhumananatomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaijing roleof3dprintedmodelsintheteachingofhumananatomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis