Cargando…
Modeling Desert Dust Exposures in Epidemiologic Short-term Health Effects Studies
Desert dust is assumed to have substantial adverse effects on human health. However, the epidemiologic evidence is still inconsistent, mainly because previous studies used different metrics for dust exposure and its corresponding epidemiologic analysis. We aim to provide a standardized approach to t...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33003150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001255 |
_version_ | 1783588404921892864 |
---|---|
author | Tobías, Aurelio Stafoggia, Massimo |
author_facet | Tobías, Aurelio Stafoggia, Massimo |
author_sort | Tobías, Aurelio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Desert dust is assumed to have substantial adverse effects on human health. However, the epidemiologic evidence is still inconsistent, mainly because previous studies used different metrics for dust exposure and its corresponding epidemiologic analysis. We aim to provide a standardized approach to the methodology for evaluating the short-term health effects of desert dust. METHODS: We reviewed the methods commonly used for dust exposure assessment, from use of a binary metric for the occurrence of desert dust advections to a continuous one for quantifying particulate matter attributable to desert dust. We presented alternative time-series Poisson regression models to evaluate the dust exposure–mortality association, from the underlying epidemiological and policy-relevant questions. A set of practical examples, using a real dataset from Rome, Italy, illustrate the different modeling approaches. RESULTS: We estimate substantial effects of desert dust episodes and particulate matter with diameter <10 μm (PM(10)) on daily mortality. The estimated effect of non-desert PM(10) was 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.4, 3.2) for a 10 μg/m(3) rise of PM(10) at lag 0 for dust days, 0.4% (95% CI = −0.1, 0.8) for non-dust days, and 0.6% (95% CI = −0.5, 2.1) for desert PM(10). CONCLUSION: The standardized modeling approach we propose could be applicable elsewhere, in and near hot spots, which could lead to more consistent evidence on the health effects of desert dust from future studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7523576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75235762020-10-14 Modeling Desert Dust Exposures in Epidemiologic Short-term Health Effects Studies Tobías, Aurelio Stafoggia, Massimo Epidemiology Environmental Epidemiology Desert dust is assumed to have substantial adverse effects on human health. However, the epidemiologic evidence is still inconsistent, mainly because previous studies used different metrics for dust exposure and its corresponding epidemiologic analysis. We aim to provide a standardized approach to the methodology for evaluating the short-term health effects of desert dust. METHODS: We reviewed the methods commonly used for dust exposure assessment, from use of a binary metric for the occurrence of desert dust advections to a continuous one for quantifying particulate matter attributable to desert dust. We presented alternative time-series Poisson regression models to evaluate the dust exposure–mortality association, from the underlying epidemiological and policy-relevant questions. A set of practical examples, using a real dataset from Rome, Italy, illustrate the different modeling approaches. RESULTS: We estimate substantial effects of desert dust episodes and particulate matter with diameter <10 μm (PM(10)) on daily mortality. The estimated effect of non-desert PM(10) was 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.4, 3.2) for a 10 μg/m(3) rise of PM(10) at lag 0 for dust days, 0.4% (95% CI = −0.1, 0.8) for non-dust days, and 0.6% (95% CI = −0.5, 2.1) for desert PM(10). CONCLUSION: The standardized modeling approach we propose could be applicable elsewhere, in and near hot spots, which could lead to more consistent evidence on the health effects of desert dust from future studies. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-09-28 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7523576/ /pubmed/33003150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001255 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Environmental Epidemiology Tobías, Aurelio Stafoggia, Massimo Modeling Desert Dust Exposures in Epidemiologic Short-term Health Effects Studies |
title | Modeling Desert Dust Exposures in Epidemiologic Short-term Health Effects Studies |
title_full | Modeling Desert Dust Exposures in Epidemiologic Short-term Health Effects Studies |
title_fullStr | Modeling Desert Dust Exposures in Epidemiologic Short-term Health Effects Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Modeling Desert Dust Exposures in Epidemiologic Short-term Health Effects Studies |
title_short | Modeling Desert Dust Exposures in Epidemiologic Short-term Health Effects Studies |
title_sort | modeling desert dust exposures in epidemiologic short-term health effects studies |
topic | Environmental Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33003150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001255 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tobiasaurelio modelingdesertdustexposuresinepidemiologicshorttermhealtheffectsstudies AT stafoggiamassimo modelingdesertdustexposuresinepidemiologicshorttermhealtheffectsstudies |