Cargando…

Modeling Desert Dust Exposures in Epidemiologic Short-term Health Effects Studies

Desert dust is assumed to have substantial adverse effects on human health. However, the epidemiologic evidence is still inconsistent, mainly because previous studies used different metrics for dust exposure and its corresponding epidemiologic analysis. We aim to provide a standardized approach to t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tobías, Aurelio, Stafoggia, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33003150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001255
_version_ 1783588404921892864
author Tobías, Aurelio
Stafoggia, Massimo
author_facet Tobías, Aurelio
Stafoggia, Massimo
author_sort Tobías, Aurelio
collection PubMed
description Desert dust is assumed to have substantial adverse effects on human health. However, the epidemiologic evidence is still inconsistent, mainly because previous studies used different metrics for dust exposure and its corresponding epidemiologic analysis. We aim to provide a standardized approach to the methodology for evaluating the short-term health effects of desert dust. METHODS: We reviewed the methods commonly used for dust exposure assessment, from use of a binary metric for the occurrence of desert dust advections to a continuous one for quantifying particulate matter attributable to desert dust. We presented alternative time-series Poisson regression models to evaluate the dust exposure–mortality association, from the underlying epidemiological and policy-relevant questions. A set of practical examples, using a real dataset from Rome, Italy, illustrate the different modeling approaches. RESULTS: We estimate substantial effects of desert dust episodes and particulate matter with diameter <10 μm (PM(10)) on daily mortality. The estimated effect of non-desert PM(10) was 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.4, 3.2) for a 10 μg/m(3) rise of PM(10) at lag 0 for dust days, 0.4% (95% CI = −0.1, 0.8) for non-dust days, and 0.6% (95% CI = −0.5, 2.1) for desert PM(10). CONCLUSION: The standardized modeling approach we propose could be applicable elsewhere, in and near hot spots, which could lead to more consistent evidence on the health effects of desert dust from future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7523576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75235762020-10-14 Modeling Desert Dust Exposures in Epidemiologic Short-term Health Effects Studies Tobías, Aurelio Stafoggia, Massimo Epidemiology Environmental Epidemiology Desert dust is assumed to have substantial adverse effects on human health. However, the epidemiologic evidence is still inconsistent, mainly because previous studies used different metrics for dust exposure and its corresponding epidemiologic analysis. We aim to provide a standardized approach to the methodology for evaluating the short-term health effects of desert dust. METHODS: We reviewed the methods commonly used for dust exposure assessment, from use of a binary metric for the occurrence of desert dust advections to a continuous one for quantifying particulate matter attributable to desert dust. We presented alternative time-series Poisson regression models to evaluate the dust exposure–mortality association, from the underlying epidemiological and policy-relevant questions. A set of practical examples, using a real dataset from Rome, Italy, illustrate the different modeling approaches. RESULTS: We estimate substantial effects of desert dust episodes and particulate matter with diameter <10 μm (PM(10)) on daily mortality. The estimated effect of non-desert PM(10) was 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.4, 3.2) for a 10 μg/m(3) rise of PM(10) at lag 0 for dust days, 0.4% (95% CI = −0.1, 0.8) for non-dust days, and 0.6% (95% CI = −0.5, 2.1) for desert PM(10). CONCLUSION: The standardized modeling approach we propose could be applicable elsewhere, in and near hot spots, which could lead to more consistent evidence on the health effects of desert dust from future studies. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-09-28 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7523576/ /pubmed/33003150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001255 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Environmental Epidemiology
Tobías, Aurelio
Stafoggia, Massimo
Modeling Desert Dust Exposures in Epidemiologic Short-term Health Effects Studies
title Modeling Desert Dust Exposures in Epidemiologic Short-term Health Effects Studies
title_full Modeling Desert Dust Exposures in Epidemiologic Short-term Health Effects Studies
title_fullStr Modeling Desert Dust Exposures in Epidemiologic Short-term Health Effects Studies
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Desert Dust Exposures in Epidemiologic Short-term Health Effects Studies
title_short Modeling Desert Dust Exposures in Epidemiologic Short-term Health Effects Studies
title_sort modeling desert dust exposures in epidemiologic short-term health effects studies
topic Environmental Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33003150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001255
work_keys_str_mv AT tobiasaurelio modelingdesertdustexposuresinepidemiologicshorttermhealtheffectsstudies
AT stafoggiamassimo modelingdesertdustexposuresinepidemiologicshorttermhealtheffectsstudies