Cargando…

Erectile function after WST11 vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy for low-risk prostate cancer treatment

Vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) using padeliporfin is currently assessed as a low-risk prostate cancer (LRPCa) treatment. The aim of this study was to assess erectile function outcomes of VTP for LRPCa treatment. We prospectively included all patients treated with VTP for LRPCa. The pri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chelly, Samuel, Maulaz, Pierre, Bigot, Pierre, Azzouzi, Abdel Rahmene, Lebdai, Souhil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31939351
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_138_19
_version_ 1783588409376243712
author Chelly, Samuel
Maulaz, Pierre
Bigot, Pierre
Azzouzi, Abdel Rahmene
Lebdai, Souhil
author_facet Chelly, Samuel
Maulaz, Pierre
Bigot, Pierre
Azzouzi, Abdel Rahmene
Lebdai, Souhil
author_sort Chelly, Samuel
collection PubMed
description Vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) using padeliporfin is currently assessed as a low-risk prostate cancer (LRPCa) treatment. The aim of this study was to assess erectile function outcomes of VTP for LRPCa treatment. We prospectively included all patients treated with VTP for LRPCa. The primary endpoint was the post-treatment International Index of Erectile Function score (IIEF5 score) evolution (at 6 months, 12 months, and then every year for 5 years). Secondary endpoints were the need of erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment and its efficacy. Eighty-two men were included. The median follow-up was 68 (range: 6–89) months. There was a 3-point significant decrease in the median IIEF5 score between baseline and at 6 months post-VTP (23 [range: 1–25] vs 20 [range: 1–25], P = 0.005). There was a 1-point decrease at 1 year and 2 years post-VTP compared to baseline (22 [range: 2–25] and 22 [range: 0–25], P < 0.005). There was no significant difference at 3, 4, and 5 years compared to baseline. Twenty-seven (32.9%) patients received ED treatment: phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDEI5; n = 18), intracavernous injections (ICI; n = 9), and intra-urethral gel (n = 1). The median IIEF5 score statistically significantly increased after ED treatment (7 [range: 0–24] vs 21 [range: 1–25], P < 0.001). ED treatment was efficient for 75% of the patients. There was no statistically significant difference between IIEF5 score at baseline and after ED treatment (P = 0.443). Forty-six patients were totally potent before VTP and among them, 13 needed ED treatment post-VTP with a success rate of 69.2%. VTP induced minimal changes in erectile function with a 3-point and a 1-point reduction in the IIEF5 score at 6 months and at 1 year, respectively. When required, ED treatment was efficient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7523613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75236132020-10-09 Erectile function after WST11 vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy for low-risk prostate cancer treatment Chelly, Samuel Maulaz, Pierre Bigot, Pierre Azzouzi, Abdel Rahmene Lebdai, Souhil Asian J Androl Original Article Vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) using padeliporfin is currently assessed as a low-risk prostate cancer (LRPCa) treatment. The aim of this study was to assess erectile function outcomes of VTP for LRPCa treatment. We prospectively included all patients treated with VTP for LRPCa. The primary endpoint was the post-treatment International Index of Erectile Function score (IIEF5 score) evolution (at 6 months, 12 months, and then every year for 5 years). Secondary endpoints were the need of erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment and its efficacy. Eighty-two men were included. The median follow-up was 68 (range: 6–89) months. There was a 3-point significant decrease in the median IIEF5 score between baseline and at 6 months post-VTP (23 [range: 1–25] vs 20 [range: 1–25], P = 0.005). There was a 1-point decrease at 1 year and 2 years post-VTP compared to baseline (22 [range: 2–25] and 22 [range: 0–25], P < 0.005). There was no significant difference at 3, 4, and 5 years compared to baseline. Twenty-seven (32.9%) patients received ED treatment: phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDEI5; n = 18), intracavernous injections (ICI; n = 9), and intra-urethral gel (n = 1). The median IIEF5 score statistically significantly increased after ED treatment (7 [range: 0–24] vs 21 [range: 1–25], P < 0.001). ED treatment was efficient for 75% of the patients. There was no statistically significant difference between IIEF5 score at baseline and after ED treatment (P = 0.443). Forty-six patients were totally potent before VTP and among them, 13 needed ED treatment post-VTP with a success rate of 69.2%. VTP induced minimal changes in erectile function with a 3-point and a 1-point reduction in the IIEF5 score at 6 months and at 1 year, respectively. When required, ED treatment was efficient. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7523613/ /pubmed/31939351 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_138_19 Text en Copyright: ©The Author(s)(2020) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chelly, Samuel
Maulaz, Pierre
Bigot, Pierre
Azzouzi, Abdel Rahmene
Lebdai, Souhil
Erectile function after WST11 vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy for low-risk prostate cancer treatment
title Erectile function after WST11 vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy for low-risk prostate cancer treatment
title_full Erectile function after WST11 vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy for low-risk prostate cancer treatment
title_fullStr Erectile function after WST11 vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy for low-risk prostate cancer treatment
title_full_unstemmed Erectile function after WST11 vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy for low-risk prostate cancer treatment
title_short Erectile function after WST11 vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy for low-risk prostate cancer treatment
title_sort erectile function after wst11 vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy for low-risk prostate cancer treatment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31939351
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_138_19
work_keys_str_mv AT chellysamuel erectilefunctionafterwst11vasculartargetedphotodynamictherapyforlowriskprostatecancertreatment
AT maulazpierre erectilefunctionafterwst11vasculartargetedphotodynamictherapyforlowriskprostatecancertreatment
AT bigotpierre erectilefunctionafterwst11vasculartargetedphotodynamictherapyforlowriskprostatecancertreatment
AT azzouziabdelrahmene erectilefunctionafterwst11vasculartargetedphotodynamictherapyforlowriskprostatecancertreatment
AT lebdaisouhil erectilefunctionafterwst11vasculartargetedphotodynamictherapyforlowriskprostatecancertreatment