Cargando…

Deactivation of prospective memory intentions: Examining the role of the stimulus–response link

Successful prospective remembering involves formation of a stimulus (e.g., bottle of medication and/or place where the bottle is kept)–response (e.g., taking a medication) link. We investigated the role of this link in the deactivation of no-longer-relevant prospective memory intentions, as evidence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Streeper, Emily, Bugg, Julie M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32996108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01091-9
_version_ 1783588415205277696
author Streeper, Emily
Bugg, Julie M.
author_facet Streeper, Emily
Bugg, Julie M.
author_sort Streeper, Emily
collection PubMed
description Successful prospective remembering involves formation of a stimulus (e.g., bottle of medication and/or place where the bottle is kept)–response (e.g., taking a medication) link. We investigated the role of this link in the deactivation of no-longer-relevant prospective memory intentions, as evidenced by commission error risk. Experiment 1a contrasted two hypotheses of intention deactivation (degree of fulfillment and response frequency) by holding constant the degree of intention fulfillment (e.g., participants responded to one of two target words) while manipulating the number of times the intention was performed. Findings supported the response frequency hypothesis. Experiment 1b employed novel lure trials to examine what “stimulus” participants link the prospective memory response to—target words and/or the salient contextual cue—and compared commission errors to Experiment 1a. Findings suggested the salient context alone does not always function as the stimulus. Collectively these findings, in conjunction with those of Experiment 2 (a within-experiment replication) and a combined analysis, suggest that (a) intention deactivation is facilitated by prior responding (formation/strengthening of stimulus–response links), but additional research is needed to establish the robustness of this effect, and (b) when responding frequently to targets, participants are more likely to bind the response to the context alone than to the target or target/context combination, possibly because they learn to rely on context to predict target occurrence. The latter finding was robust and indicates that deactivation of the appropriate stimulus (target and/or context)–response link may be a critical component of reducing commission errors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7523690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75236902020-09-30 Deactivation of prospective memory intentions: Examining the role of the stimulus–response link Streeper, Emily Bugg, Julie M. Mem Cognit Article Successful prospective remembering involves formation of a stimulus (e.g., bottle of medication and/or place where the bottle is kept)–response (e.g., taking a medication) link. We investigated the role of this link in the deactivation of no-longer-relevant prospective memory intentions, as evidenced by commission error risk. Experiment 1a contrasted two hypotheses of intention deactivation (degree of fulfillment and response frequency) by holding constant the degree of intention fulfillment (e.g., participants responded to one of two target words) while manipulating the number of times the intention was performed. Findings supported the response frequency hypothesis. Experiment 1b employed novel lure trials to examine what “stimulus” participants link the prospective memory response to—target words and/or the salient contextual cue—and compared commission errors to Experiment 1a. Findings suggested the salient context alone does not always function as the stimulus. Collectively these findings, in conjunction with those of Experiment 2 (a within-experiment replication) and a combined analysis, suggest that (a) intention deactivation is facilitated by prior responding (formation/strengthening of stimulus–response links), but additional research is needed to establish the robustness of this effect, and (b) when responding frequently to targets, participants are more likely to bind the response to the context alone than to the target or target/context combination, possibly because they learn to rely on context to predict target occurrence. The latter finding was robust and indicates that deactivation of the appropriate stimulus (target and/or context)–response link may be a critical component of reducing commission errors. Springer US 2020-09-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7523690/ /pubmed/32996108 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01091-9 Text en © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Streeper, Emily
Bugg, Julie M.
Deactivation of prospective memory intentions: Examining the role of the stimulus–response link
title Deactivation of prospective memory intentions: Examining the role of the stimulus–response link
title_full Deactivation of prospective memory intentions: Examining the role of the stimulus–response link
title_fullStr Deactivation of prospective memory intentions: Examining the role of the stimulus–response link
title_full_unstemmed Deactivation of prospective memory intentions: Examining the role of the stimulus–response link
title_short Deactivation of prospective memory intentions: Examining the role of the stimulus–response link
title_sort deactivation of prospective memory intentions: examining the role of the stimulus–response link
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32996108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01091-9
work_keys_str_mv AT streeperemily deactivationofprospectivememoryintentionsexaminingtheroleofthestimulusresponselink
AT buggjuliem deactivationofprospectivememoryintentionsexaminingtheroleofthestimulusresponselink