Cargando…

Relationship between hand and wrist bone age assessment methods

Assessment of skeletal maturity is crucial for managing growth related problems. Tanner and Whitehouse (TW) hand and wrist bone age assessment is an accurate method; however, it is complex and labor-intensive. Several simplified methods derived from the TW method were proposed, and each had its own...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bian, Zhen, Guo, Yuan, Lyu, XueMin, Yang, Zheng, Cheung, Jason Pui Yin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32991461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022392
_version_ 1783588426088448000
author Bian, Zhen
Guo, Yuan
Lyu, XueMin
Yang, Zheng
Cheung, Jason Pui Yin
author_facet Bian, Zhen
Guo, Yuan
Lyu, XueMin
Yang, Zheng
Cheung, Jason Pui Yin
author_sort Bian, Zhen
collection PubMed
description Assessment of skeletal maturity is crucial for managing growth related problems. Tanner and Whitehouse (TW) hand and wrist bone age assessment is an accurate method; however, it is complex and labor-intensive. Several simplified methods derived from the TW method were proposed, and each had its own character. The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between these methods for accurate usage. Between 2018 and 2019, a cross-sectional study was performed with consecutive left hand and wrist x-rays obtained from a pediatric orthopedic clinic. Bone age assessments included the distal radius and ulna (DRU) classification, Sanders staging (S), thumb ossification composite index (T), and TW method. Somers delta correlation was conducted to determine the interchangeability of these stages. The mean bone age and standard deviation (SD) of each subgrade were compared and analyzed. Totally 103 films (92 girls) were analyzed with mean age of 12.1 years (range: 8.0–17.9 years). The radius (R) stages had good correlation with S, T, and U stages with a very high Somers delta correlation (P < .05). R5 had relatively large SD (1.5) and referred to T2 and T3; R6 and R7 had the smallest SD (0.3) with reference to T4 or S2; R8 referred to T5 or S3, S4, S5; R9 referred to S6 and S7. The internal relationship between the DRU and digital stages system was well proven. We also provided a simple and accurate way to assess the bone age by combination of some subgrades with smaller SD: 10y-proximal thumb covered without sesamoid (T2); 10.5y-sesamoid just appearing (T3); 11y-distal radial physis just covered (medial double joint line, R6); 11.5y-medial capping of distal radial physis (R7); 12y-bilateral capping of distal radial physis (R8) / phalangeal capping without fusion (S3); 12.5y-distal phalangeal physes start to fuse (S4); 13y-distal phalangeal physes fused (S5); 13.5y-proximal phalangeal physes start to fuse (S6); 14.5y-proximal phalangeal physes fused (S7); 15y-distal radial physis almost fused (R10). Level of Evidence: Diagnostic study, level III.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7523768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75237682020-10-14 Relationship between hand and wrist bone age assessment methods Bian, Zhen Guo, Yuan Lyu, XueMin Yang, Zheng Cheung, Jason Pui Yin Medicine (Baltimore) 6200 Assessment of skeletal maturity is crucial for managing growth related problems. Tanner and Whitehouse (TW) hand and wrist bone age assessment is an accurate method; however, it is complex and labor-intensive. Several simplified methods derived from the TW method were proposed, and each had its own character. The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between these methods for accurate usage. Between 2018 and 2019, a cross-sectional study was performed with consecutive left hand and wrist x-rays obtained from a pediatric orthopedic clinic. Bone age assessments included the distal radius and ulna (DRU) classification, Sanders staging (S), thumb ossification composite index (T), and TW method. Somers delta correlation was conducted to determine the interchangeability of these stages. The mean bone age and standard deviation (SD) of each subgrade were compared and analyzed. Totally 103 films (92 girls) were analyzed with mean age of 12.1 years (range: 8.0–17.9 years). The radius (R) stages had good correlation with S, T, and U stages with a very high Somers delta correlation (P < .05). R5 had relatively large SD (1.5) and referred to T2 and T3; R6 and R7 had the smallest SD (0.3) with reference to T4 or S2; R8 referred to T5 or S3, S4, S5; R9 referred to S6 and S7. The internal relationship between the DRU and digital stages system was well proven. We also provided a simple and accurate way to assess the bone age by combination of some subgrades with smaller SD: 10y-proximal thumb covered without sesamoid (T2); 10.5y-sesamoid just appearing (T3); 11y-distal radial physis just covered (medial double joint line, R6); 11.5y-medial capping of distal radial physis (R7); 12y-bilateral capping of distal radial physis (R8) / phalangeal capping without fusion (S3); 12.5y-distal phalangeal physes start to fuse (S4); 13y-distal phalangeal physes fused (S5); 13.5y-proximal phalangeal physes start to fuse (S6); 14.5y-proximal phalangeal physes fused (S7); 15y-distal radial physis almost fused (R10). Level of Evidence: Diagnostic study, level III. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7523768/ /pubmed/32991461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022392 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 6200
Bian, Zhen
Guo, Yuan
Lyu, XueMin
Yang, Zheng
Cheung, Jason Pui Yin
Relationship between hand and wrist bone age assessment methods
title Relationship between hand and wrist bone age assessment methods
title_full Relationship between hand and wrist bone age assessment methods
title_fullStr Relationship between hand and wrist bone age assessment methods
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between hand and wrist bone age assessment methods
title_short Relationship between hand and wrist bone age assessment methods
title_sort relationship between hand and wrist bone age assessment methods
topic 6200
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32991461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022392
work_keys_str_mv AT bianzhen relationshipbetweenhandandwristboneageassessmentmethods
AT guoyuan relationshipbetweenhandandwristboneageassessmentmethods
AT lyuxuemin relationshipbetweenhandandwristboneageassessmentmethods
AT yangzheng relationshipbetweenhandandwristboneageassessmentmethods
AT cheungjasonpuiyin relationshipbetweenhandandwristboneageassessmentmethods