Cargando…
Physiologic Response to Angiotensin II Treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019–Induced Vasodilatory Shock: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study
OBJECTIVES: To assess the early physiologic response to angiotensin-II treatment in patients with coronavirus disease 2019–induced respiratory failure and distributive shock. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive-sample cohort study. SETTING: Three medical ICUs in New York during the coronavirus disease...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33063034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000230 |
_version_ | 1783588445718839296 |
---|---|
author | Leisman, Daniel E. Mastroianni, Fiore Fisler, Grace Shah, Sareen Hasan, Zubair Narasimhan, Mangala Taylor, Matthew D. Deutschman, Clifford S. |
author_facet | Leisman, Daniel E. Mastroianni, Fiore Fisler, Grace Shah, Sareen Hasan, Zubair Narasimhan, Mangala Taylor, Matthew D. Deutschman, Clifford S. |
author_sort | Leisman, Daniel E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the early physiologic response to angiotensin-II treatment in patients with coronavirus disease 2019–induced respiratory failure and distributive shock. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive-sample cohort study. SETTING: Three medical ICUs in New York during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak. PATIENTS: All patients were admitted to the ICU with respiratory failure and were receiving norepinephrine for distributive shock. INTERVENTIONS: The treatment groups were patients who received greater than or equal to 1 hour of angiotensin-II treatment. Time-zero was the time of angiotensin-II initiation. Controls were identified using a 2:1 hierarchical process that matched for 1) date and unit of admission; 2) specific organ support modalities; 3) age; 4) chronic lung, cardiovascular, and kidney disease; and 5) sex. Time-zero in the control group was 21 hours post vasopressor initiation, the mean duration of vasopressor therapy prior to angiotensin-II initiation in the treated group. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Main outcomes were trajectories of vasopressor requirements (in norepinephrine-equivalent dose) and mean arterial pressure. Additionally assessed trajectories were respiratory (Pao(2)/Fio(2), Paco(2)), metabolic (pH, creatinine), and coagulation (d-dimer) dysfunction indices after time-zero. We also recorded adverse events and clinical outcomes. Trajectories were analyzed using mixed-effects models for immediate (first 6 hr), early (48 hr), and sustained (7 d) responses. Twenty-nine patients (n = 10 treated, n = 19 control) were identified. Despite matching, angiotensin-II–treated patients had markedly greater vasopressor requirements (mean: 0.489 vs 0.097 µg/kg/min), oxygenation impairment, and acidosis at time-zero. Nonetheless, angiotensin-II treatment was associated with an immediate and sustained reduction in norepinephrine-equivalent dose (6 hr model: β = –0.036 µg/kg/min/hr; 95% CI: –0.054 to –0.018 µg/kg/min/hr, p(interaction)=0.0002) (7 d model: β = –0.04 µg/kg/min/d, 95% CI: –0.05 to –0.03 µg/kg/min/d; p(interaction) = 0.0002). Compared with controls, angiotensin-II–treated patients had significantly faster improvement in mean arterial pressure, hypercapnia, acidosis, baseline-corrected creatinine, and d-dimer. Three thrombotic events occurred, all in control patients. CONCLUSIONS: Angiotensin-II treatment for coronavirus disease 2019–induced distributive shock was associated with rapid improvement in multiple physiologic indices. Angiotensin-II in coronavirus disease 2019–induced shock warrants further study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7523856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75238562020-10-14 Physiologic Response to Angiotensin II Treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019–Induced Vasodilatory Shock: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study Leisman, Daniel E. Mastroianni, Fiore Fisler, Grace Shah, Sareen Hasan, Zubair Narasimhan, Mangala Taylor, Matthew D. Deutschman, Clifford S. Crit Care Explor Original Clinical Report OBJECTIVES: To assess the early physiologic response to angiotensin-II treatment in patients with coronavirus disease 2019–induced respiratory failure and distributive shock. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive-sample cohort study. SETTING: Three medical ICUs in New York during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak. PATIENTS: All patients were admitted to the ICU with respiratory failure and were receiving norepinephrine for distributive shock. INTERVENTIONS: The treatment groups were patients who received greater than or equal to 1 hour of angiotensin-II treatment. Time-zero was the time of angiotensin-II initiation. Controls were identified using a 2:1 hierarchical process that matched for 1) date and unit of admission; 2) specific organ support modalities; 3) age; 4) chronic lung, cardiovascular, and kidney disease; and 5) sex. Time-zero in the control group was 21 hours post vasopressor initiation, the mean duration of vasopressor therapy prior to angiotensin-II initiation in the treated group. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Main outcomes were trajectories of vasopressor requirements (in norepinephrine-equivalent dose) and mean arterial pressure. Additionally assessed trajectories were respiratory (Pao(2)/Fio(2), Paco(2)), metabolic (pH, creatinine), and coagulation (d-dimer) dysfunction indices after time-zero. We also recorded adverse events and clinical outcomes. Trajectories were analyzed using mixed-effects models for immediate (first 6 hr), early (48 hr), and sustained (7 d) responses. Twenty-nine patients (n = 10 treated, n = 19 control) were identified. Despite matching, angiotensin-II–treated patients had markedly greater vasopressor requirements (mean: 0.489 vs 0.097 µg/kg/min), oxygenation impairment, and acidosis at time-zero. Nonetheless, angiotensin-II treatment was associated with an immediate and sustained reduction in norepinephrine-equivalent dose (6 hr model: β = –0.036 µg/kg/min/hr; 95% CI: –0.054 to –0.018 µg/kg/min/hr, p(interaction)=0.0002) (7 d model: β = –0.04 µg/kg/min/d, 95% CI: –0.05 to –0.03 µg/kg/min/d; p(interaction) = 0.0002). Compared with controls, angiotensin-II–treated patients had significantly faster improvement in mean arterial pressure, hypercapnia, acidosis, baseline-corrected creatinine, and d-dimer. Three thrombotic events occurred, all in control patients. CONCLUSIONS: Angiotensin-II treatment for coronavirus disease 2019–induced distributive shock was associated with rapid improvement in multiple physiologic indices. Angiotensin-II in coronavirus disease 2019–induced shock warrants further study. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7523856/ /pubmed/33063034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000230 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections. |
spellingShingle | Original Clinical Report Leisman, Daniel E. Mastroianni, Fiore Fisler, Grace Shah, Sareen Hasan, Zubair Narasimhan, Mangala Taylor, Matthew D. Deutschman, Clifford S. Physiologic Response to Angiotensin II Treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019–Induced Vasodilatory Shock: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study |
title | Physiologic Response to Angiotensin II Treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019–Induced Vasodilatory Shock: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study |
title_full | Physiologic Response to Angiotensin II Treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019–Induced Vasodilatory Shock: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Physiologic Response to Angiotensin II Treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019–Induced Vasodilatory Shock: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Physiologic Response to Angiotensin II Treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019–Induced Vasodilatory Shock: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study |
title_short | Physiologic Response to Angiotensin II Treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019–Induced Vasodilatory Shock: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study |
title_sort | physiologic response to angiotensin ii treatment for coronavirus disease 2019–induced vasodilatory shock: a retrospective matched cohort study |
topic | Original Clinical Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33063034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000230 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leismandaniele physiologicresponsetoangiotensiniitreatmentforcoronavirusdisease2019inducedvasodilatoryshockaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy AT mastroiannifiore physiologicresponsetoangiotensiniitreatmentforcoronavirusdisease2019inducedvasodilatoryshockaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy AT fislergrace physiologicresponsetoangiotensiniitreatmentforcoronavirusdisease2019inducedvasodilatoryshockaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy AT shahsareen physiologicresponsetoangiotensiniitreatmentforcoronavirusdisease2019inducedvasodilatoryshockaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy AT hasanzubair physiologicresponsetoangiotensiniitreatmentforcoronavirusdisease2019inducedvasodilatoryshockaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy AT narasimhanmangala physiologicresponsetoangiotensiniitreatmentforcoronavirusdisease2019inducedvasodilatoryshockaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy AT taylormatthewd physiologicresponsetoangiotensiniitreatmentforcoronavirusdisease2019inducedvasodilatoryshockaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy AT deutschmancliffords physiologicresponsetoangiotensiniitreatmentforcoronavirusdisease2019inducedvasodilatoryshockaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy |