Cargando…

Comparison of anorectal function measured using wearable digital manometry and a high resolution manometry system

There is a need for a lower cost manometry system for assessing anorectal function in primary and secondary care settings. We developed an index finger-based system (termed “digital manometry”) and tested it in healthy volunteers, patients with chronic constipation, and fecal incontinence. Anorectal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Attari, Ali, Chey, William D., Baker, Jason R., Ashton-Miller, James A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32991595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228761
_version_ 1783588457633808384
author Attari, Ali
Chey, William D.
Baker, Jason R.
Ashton-Miller, James A.
author_facet Attari, Ali
Chey, William D.
Baker, Jason R.
Ashton-Miller, James A.
author_sort Attari, Ali
collection PubMed
description There is a need for a lower cost manometry system for assessing anorectal function in primary and secondary care settings. We developed an index finger-based system (termed “digital manometry”) and tested it in healthy volunteers, patients with chronic constipation, and fecal incontinence. Anorectal pressures were measured in 16 participants with the digital manometry system and a 23-channel high-resolution anorectal manometry system. The results were compared using a Bland-Altman analysis at rest as well as during maximum squeeze and simulated defecation maneuvers. Myoelectric activity of the puborectalis muscle was also quantified simultaneously using the digital manometry system. The limits of agreement between the two methods were -7.1 ± 25.7 mmHg for anal sphincter resting pressure, 0.4 ± 23.0 mmHg for the anal sphincter pressure change during simulated defecation, -37.6 ± 50.9 mmHg for rectal pressure changes during simulated defecation, and -20.6 ± 172.6 mmHg for anal sphincter pressure during the maximum squeeze maneuver. The change in the puborectalis myoelectric activity was proportional to the anal sphincter pressure increment during a maximum squeeze maneuver (slope = 0.6, R(2) = 0.4). Digital manometry provided a similar evaluation of anorectal pressures and puborectalis myoelectric activity at an order of magnitude less cost than high-resolution manometry, and with a similar level of patient comfort. Digital Manometry provides a simple, inexpensive, point of service means of assessing anorectal function in patients with chronic constipation and fecal incontinence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7523952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75239522020-10-06 Comparison of anorectal function measured using wearable digital manometry and a high resolution manometry system Attari, Ali Chey, William D. Baker, Jason R. Ashton-Miller, James A. PLoS One Research Article There is a need for a lower cost manometry system for assessing anorectal function in primary and secondary care settings. We developed an index finger-based system (termed “digital manometry”) and tested it in healthy volunteers, patients with chronic constipation, and fecal incontinence. Anorectal pressures were measured in 16 participants with the digital manometry system and a 23-channel high-resolution anorectal manometry system. The results were compared using a Bland-Altman analysis at rest as well as during maximum squeeze and simulated defecation maneuvers. Myoelectric activity of the puborectalis muscle was also quantified simultaneously using the digital manometry system. The limits of agreement between the two methods were -7.1 ± 25.7 mmHg for anal sphincter resting pressure, 0.4 ± 23.0 mmHg for the anal sphincter pressure change during simulated defecation, -37.6 ± 50.9 mmHg for rectal pressure changes during simulated defecation, and -20.6 ± 172.6 mmHg for anal sphincter pressure during the maximum squeeze maneuver. The change in the puborectalis myoelectric activity was proportional to the anal sphincter pressure increment during a maximum squeeze maneuver (slope = 0.6, R(2) = 0.4). Digital manometry provided a similar evaluation of anorectal pressures and puborectalis myoelectric activity at an order of magnitude less cost than high-resolution manometry, and with a similar level of patient comfort. Digital Manometry provides a simple, inexpensive, point of service means of assessing anorectal function in patients with chronic constipation and fecal incontinence. Public Library of Science 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7523952/ /pubmed/32991595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228761 Text en © 2020 Attari et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Attari, Ali
Chey, William D.
Baker, Jason R.
Ashton-Miller, James A.
Comparison of anorectal function measured using wearable digital manometry and a high resolution manometry system
title Comparison of anorectal function measured using wearable digital manometry and a high resolution manometry system
title_full Comparison of anorectal function measured using wearable digital manometry and a high resolution manometry system
title_fullStr Comparison of anorectal function measured using wearable digital manometry and a high resolution manometry system
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of anorectal function measured using wearable digital manometry and a high resolution manometry system
title_short Comparison of anorectal function measured using wearable digital manometry and a high resolution manometry system
title_sort comparison of anorectal function measured using wearable digital manometry and a high resolution manometry system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32991595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228761
work_keys_str_mv AT attariali comparisonofanorectalfunctionmeasuredusingwearabledigitalmanometryandahighresolutionmanometrysystem
AT cheywilliamd comparisonofanorectalfunctionmeasuredusingwearabledigitalmanometryandahighresolutionmanometrysystem
AT bakerjasonr comparisonofanorectalfunctionmeasuredusingwearabledigitalmanometryandahighresolutionmanometrysystem
AT ashtonmillerjamesa comparisonofanorectalfunctionmeasuredusingwearabledigitalmanometryandahighresolutionmanometrysystem