Cargando…

Patient‐reported outcomes in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction: focus on physical independence

AIMS: The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a widely used patient‐reported outcome measure in heart failure (HF). The KCCQ was validated in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), leaving knowledge gaps regarding its applicability in HF with preserved ejection fract...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Weiting, Teng, Tiew‐Hwa Katherine, Tay, Wan Ting, Richards, Arthur Mark, Kadam, Umesh, Lawson, Claire A., Shimizu, Wataru, Loh, Seet Yoong, Anand, Inder, Lam, Carolyn Su Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32862518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12950
_version_ 1783588482476670976
author Huang, Weiting
Teng, Tiew‐Hwa Katherine
Tay, Wan Ting
Richards, Arthur Mark
Kadam, Umesh
Lawson, Claire A.
Shimizu, Wataru
Loh, Seet Yoong
Anand, Inder
Lam, Carolyn Su Ping
author_facet Huang, Weiting
Teng, Tiew‐Hwa Katherine
Tay, Wan Ting
Richards, Arthur Mark
Kadam, Umesh
Lawson, Claire A.
Shimizu, Wataru
Loh, Seet Yoong
Anand, Inder
Lam, Carolyn Su Ping
author_sort Huang, Weiting
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a widely used patient‐reported outcome measure in heart failure (HF). The KCCQ was validated in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), leaving knowledge gaps regarding its applicability in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study addresses the psychometric properties of internal consistency and reliability, construct, and known‐group validity of KCCQ in both HFrEF and HFpEF. We aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the KCCQ and their prognostic significance in HFpEF and HFrEF, within a large prospective multinational HF cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the 23‐item KCCQ in the prospective multinational ASIAN‐HF study [4470 HFrEF (ejection fraction <40%); 921 HFpEF (ejection fraction ≥50%)]. Internal consistency (using Cronbach's alpha) showed high reliability in HFrEF and HFpeF: functional status score: 0.89 and 0.91 and clinical summary score: 0.89 and 0.90, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis in HFrEF validated the five original domains of KCCQ (physical function, symptoms, self‐efficacy, social limitation, and quality of life); in HFpEF, questions measuring physical function and social limitation had strong correlation (r = 0.66) and different domains emerged. We proposed an additional physical independence summary score, especially in HFpEF (comprising the original physical function and social limitation domains), which showed good internal consistency (α = 0.89) and has comparable receiver operating characteristic curve 0.766 ± 0.037 with the clinical summary score (receiver operating characteristic curve 0.774 ± 0.037), in predicting 1 year death and/or HF hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed the robustness of the KCCQ clinical summary score in HF regardless of ejection fraction group. In the assessment of physical capacity in HFpEF, our results suggest strong interaction with social limitation, and we propose a summary score comprising both components be used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7524068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75240682020-10-02 Patient‐reported outcomes in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction: focus on physical independence Huang, Weiting Teng, Tiew‐Hwa Katherine Tay, Wan Ting Richards, Arthur Mark Kadam, Umesh Lawson, Claire A. Shimizu, Wataru Loh, Seet Yoong Anand, Inder Lam, Carolyn Su Ping ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a widely used patient‐reported outcome measure in heart failure (HF). The KCCQ was validated in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), leaving knowledge gaps regarding its applicability in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study addresses the psychometric properties of internal consistency and reliability, construct, and known‐group validity of KCCQ in both HFrEF and HFpEF. We aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the KCCQ and their prognostic significance in HFpEF and HFrEF, within a large prospective multinational HF cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the 23‐item KCCQ in the prospective multinational ASIAN‐HF study [4470 HFrEF (ejection fraction <40%); 921 HFpEF (ejection fraction ≥50%)]. Internal consistency (using Cronbach's alpha) showed high reliability in HFrEF and HFpeF: functional status score: 0.89 and 0.91 and clinical summary score: 0.89 and 0.90, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis in HFrEF validated the five original domains of KCCQ (physical function, symptoms, self‐efficacy, social limitation, and quality of life); in HFpEF, questions measuring physical function and social limitation had strong correlation (r = 0.66) and different domains emerged. We proposed an additional physical independence summary score, especially in HFpEF (comprising the original physical function and social limitation domains), which showed good internal consistency (α = 0.89) and has comparable receiver operating characteristic curve 0.766 ± 0.037 with the clinical summary score (receiver operating characteristic curve 0.774 ± 0.037), in predicting 1 year death and/or HF hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed the robustness of the KCCQ clinical summary score in HF regardless of ejection fraction group. In the assessment of physical capacity in HFpEF, our results suggest strong interaction with social limitation, and we propose a summary score comprising both components be used. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7524068/ /pubmed/32862518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12950 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Huang, Weiting
Teng, Tiew‐Hwa Katherine
Tay, Wan Ting
Richards, Arthur Mark
Kadam, Umesh
Lawson, Claire A.
Shimizu, Wataru
Loh, Seet Yoong
Anand, Inder
Lam, Carolyn Su Ping
Patient‐reported outcomes in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction: focus on physical independence
title Patient‐reported outcomes in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction: focus on physical independence
title_full Patient‐reported outcomes in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction: focus on physical independence
title_fullStr Patient‐reported outcomes in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction: focus on physical independence
title_full_unstemmed Patient‐reported outcomes in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction: focus on physical independence
title_short Patient‐reported outcomes in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction: focus on physical independence
title_sort patient‐reported outcomes in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction: focus on physical independence
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32862518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12950
work_keys_str_mv AT huangweiting patientreportedoutcomesinheartfailurewithpreservedvsreducedejectionfractionfocusonphysicalindependence
AT tengtiewhwakatherine patientreportedoutcomesinheartfailurewithpreservedvsreducedejectionfractionfocusonphysicalindependence
AT taywanting patientreportedoutcomesinheartfailurewithpreservedvsreducedejectionfractionfocusonphysicalindependence
AT richardsarthurmark patientreportedoutcomesinheartfailurewithpreservedvsreducedejectionfractionfocusonphysicalindependence
AT kadamumesh patientreportedoutcomesinheartfailurewithpreservedvsreducedejectionfractionfocusonphysicalindependence
AT lawsonclairea patientreportedoutcomesinheartfailurewithpreservedvsreducedejectionfractionfocusonphysicalindependence
AT shimizuwataru patientreportedoutcomesinheartfailurewithpreservedvsreducedejectionfractionfocusonphysicalindependence
AT lohseetyoong patientreportedoutcomesinheartfailurewithpreservedvsreducedejectionfractionfocusonphysicalindependence
AT anandinder patientreportedoutcomesinheartfailurewithpreservedvsreducedejectionfractionfocusonphysicalindependence
AT lamcarolynsuping patientreportedoutcomesinheartfailurewithpreservedvsreducedejectionfractionfocusonphysicalindependence