Cargando…

Trends in cause‐specific readmissions in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced and mid‐range ejection fraction

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the readmission of heart failure (HF) patients has decreased over time and how it differs among HF with preserved ejection fraction (EF) (HFpEF) vs. reduced EF (HFrEF) and mid‐range EF (HFmrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated HF patients inde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Xiaotong, Thunström, Erik, Dahlström, Ulf, Zhou, Jingmin, Ge, Junbo, Fu, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32729678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12899
_version_ 1783588496710041600
author Cui, Xiaotong
Thunström, Erik
Dahlström, Ulf
Zhou, Jingmin
Ge, Junbo
Fu, Michael
author_facet Cui, Xiaotong
Thunström, Erik
Dahlström, Ulf
Zhou, Jingmin
Ge, Junbo
Fu, Michael
author_sort Cui, Xiaotong
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the readmission of heart failure (HF) patients has decreased over time and how it differs among HF with preserved ejection fraction (EF) (HFpEF) vs. reduced EF (HFrEF) and mid‐range EF (HFmrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated HF patients index hospitalized from January 2004 to December 2011 in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry with 1 year follow‐up. Outcome measures were the first occurring all‐cause, cardiovascular (CV), and HF readmissions. A total of 20 877 HF patients (11 064 HFrEF, 4215 HFmrEF, and 5562 HFpEF) were included in the study. All‐cause readmission was the highest in patients with HFpEF, whereas CV and HF readmissions were the highest in HFrEF. From 2004 to 2011, HF readmission rates within 6 months (from 22.3% to 17.3%, P = 0.003) and 1 year (from 27.7% to 23.4%, P = 0.019) in HFpEF declined, and the risk for 1 year HF readmission in HFpEF was reduced by 7% after adjusting for age and sex (P = 0.022). Likewise, risk factors for HF readmission in HFpEF changed. However, no significant changes were observed in all‐cause or CV readmission rates in HFpEF, and no significant changes in cause‐specific readmissions were observed in HFrEF. Time to the first readmission did not change significantly from 2004 to 2011, regardless of EF subgroup (all P‐values > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Declining temporal trend in HF readmission rates was found in HFpEF, but all‐cause readmission still remained the highest in HFpEF vs. HFrEF and HFmrEF. More efforts are needed to reduce the non‐HF‐related readmission in patients with HFpEF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7524131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75241312020-10-02 Trends in cause‐specific readmissions in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced and mid‐range ejection fraction Cui, Xiaotong Thunström, Erik Dahlström, Ulf Zhou, Jingmin Ge, Junbo Fu, Michael ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the readmission of heart failure (HF) patients has decreased over time and how it differs among HF with preserved ejection fraction (EF) (HFpEF) vs. reduced EF (HFrEF) and mid‐range EF (HFmrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated HF patients index hospitalized from January 2004 to December 2011 in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry with 1 year follow‐up. Outcome measures were the first occurring all‐cause, cardiovascular (CV), and HF readmissions. A total of 20 877 HF patients (11 064 HFrEF, 4215 HFmrEF, and 5562 HFpEF) were included in the study. All‐cause readmission was the highest in patients with HFpEF, whereas CV and HF readmissions were the highest in HFrEF. From 2004 to 2011, HF readmission rates within 6 months (from 22.3% to 17.3%, P = 0.003) and 1 year (from 27.7% to 23.4%, P = 0.019) in HFpEF declined, and the risk for 1 year HF readmission in HFpEF was reduced by 7% after adjusting for age and sex (P = 0.022). Likewise, risk factors for HF readmission in HFpEF changed. However, no significant changes were observed in all‐cause or CV readmission rates in HFpEF, and no significant changes in cause‐specific readmissions were observed in HFrEF. Time to the first readmission did not change significantly from 2004 to 2011, regardless of EF subgroup (all P‐values > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Declining temporal trend in HF readmission rates was found in HFpEF, but all‐cause readmission still remained the highest in HFpEF vs. HFrEF and HFmrEF. More efforts are needed to reduce the non‐HF‐related readmission in patients with HFpEF. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7524131/ /pubmed/32729678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12899 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Cui, Xiaotong
Thunström, Erik
Dahlström, Ulf
Zhou, Jingmin
Ge, Junbo
Fu, Michael
Trends in cause‐specific readmissions in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced and mid‐range ejection fraction
title Trends in cause‐specific readmissions in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced and mid‐range ejection fraction
title_full Trends in cause‐specific readmissions in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced and mid‐range ejection fraction
title_fullStr Trends in cause‐specific readmissions in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced and mid‐range ejection fraction
title_full_unstemmed Trends in cause‐specific readmissions in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced and mid‐range ejection fraction
title_short Trends in cause‐specific readmissions in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced and mid‐range ejection fraction
title_sort trends in cause‐specific readmissions in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced and mid‐range ejection fraction
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32729678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12899
work_keys_str_mv AT cuixiaotong trendsincausespecificreadmissionsinheartfailurewithpreservedvsreducedandmidrangeejectionfraction
AT thunstromerik trendsincausespecificreadmissionsinheartfailurewithpreservedvsreducedandmidrangeejectionfraction
AT dahlstromulf trendsincausespecificreadmissionsinheartfailurewithpreservedvsreducedandmidrangeejectionfraction
AT zhoujingmin trendsincausespecificreadmissionsinheartfailurewithpreservedvsreducedandmidrangeejectionfraction
AT gejunbo trendsincausespecificreadmissionsinheartfailurewithpreservedvsreducedandmidrangeejectionfraction
AT fumichael trendsincausespecificreadmissionsinheartfailurewithpreservedvsreducedandmidrangeejectionfraction