Cargando…

Cystoid Macular Edema Following Cataract Surgery with Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser versus Conventional Phacoemulsification

PURPOSE: To compare postoperative changes in central subfield macular thickness (CSMT) and prevalence of cystoid macular edema (CME) in patients undergoing cataract surgery with low-energy femtosecond laser versus standard phacoemulsification. DESIGN: This was a retrospective comparative real-world...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Nuffel, Stefaan, Claeys, Matthias F, Claeys, Marnix H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33061272
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S261565
_version_ 1783588505886130176
author Van Nuffel, Stefaan
Claeys, Matthias F
Claeys, Marnix H
author_facet Van Nuffel, Stefaan
Claeys, Matthias F
Claeys, Marnix H
author_sort Van Nuffel, Stefaan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare postoperative changes in central subfield macular thickness (CSMT) and prevalence of cystoid macular edema (CME) in patients undergoing cataract surgery with low-energy femtosecond laser versus standard phacoemulsification. DESIGN: This was a retrospective comparative real-world study. METHODS: Postoperative data of 252 eyes of 165 patients were collected: 138 eyes received low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and 114 eyes underwent conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery (CPCS). Postoperative changes in CSMT and prevalence of CME were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in mean CSMT from preoperative to postoperative values at 2.5 months in both the FLACS and CPCS group (p<0.001). Mean change (preoperation to 2.5 months postoperation) in CSMT was 6.2±11.5 µm in the FLACS group and 7.3±26.6 µm in the CPCS group, which was statistically significant but clinically not relevant. Comparison of mean changes in CSMT (preoperation to 2.5 months postoperation) between the FLACS and CPCS groups revealed no significant differences. The rate of pseudophakic CME (PCME) development was lower in the FLACS group (1.4%) than the CPCS group (4.4%; p=0.247). When using PREMED criteria to define clinically significant PCME, only 0.7% patients in the FLACS group and 1.8% in the CPCS group showed development of clinically significant PCME (p=0.586). CONCLUSION: The mean change in CSMT and occurrence of postoperative CME was lower in the low-energy FLACS group than the standard-phacoemulsification group; however, the difference was not statistically significant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7524180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75241802020-10-14 Cystoid Macular Edema Following Cataract Surgery with Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser versus Conventional Phacoemulsification Van Nuffel, Stefaan Claeys, Matthias F Claeys, Marnix H Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To compare postoperative changes in central subfield macular thickness (CSMT) and prevalence of cystoid macular edema (CME) in patients undergoing cataract surgery with low-energy femtosecond laser versus standard phacoemulsification. DESIGN: This was a retrospective comparative real-world study. METHODS: Postoperative data of 252 eyes of 165 patients were collected: 138 eyes received low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and 114 eyes underwent conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery (CPCS). Postoperative changes in CSMT and prevalence of CME were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in mean CSMT from preoperative to postoperative values at 2.5 months in both the FLACS and CPCS group (p<0.001). Mean change (preoperation to 2.5 months postoperation) in CSMT was 6.2±11.5 µm in the FLACS group and 7.3±26.6 µm in the CPCS group, which was statistically significant but clinically not relevant. Comparison of mean changes in CSMT (preoperation to 2.5 months postoperation) between the FLACS and CPCS groups revealed no significant differences. The rate of pseudophakic CME (PCME) development was lower in the FLACS group (1.4%) than the CPCS group (4.4%; p=0.247). When using PREMED criteria to define clinically significant PCME, only 0.7% patients in the FLACS group and 1.8% in the CPCS group showed development of clinically significant PCME (p=0.586). CONCLUSION: The mean change in CSMT and occurrence of postoperative CME was lower in the low-energy FLACS group than the standard-phacoemulsification group; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Dove 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7524180/ /pubmed/33061272 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S261565 Text en © 2020 Van Nuffel et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Van Nuffel, Stefaan
Claeys, Matthias F
Claeys, Marnix H
Cystoid Macular Edema Following Cataract Surgery with Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser versus Conventional Phacoemulsification
title Cystoid Macular Edema Following Cataract Surgery with Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser versus Conventional Phacoemulsification
title_full Cystoid Macular Edema Following Cataract Surgery with Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser versus Conventional Phacoemulsification
title_fullStr Cystoid Macular Edema Following Cataract Surgery with Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser versus Conventional Phacoemulsification
title_full_unstemmed Cystoid Macular Edema Following Cataract Surgery with Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser versus Conventional Phacoemulsification
title_short Cystoid Macular Edema Following Cataract Surgery with Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser versus Conventional Phacoemulsification
title_sort cystoid macular edema following cataract surgery with low-energy femtosecond laser versus conventional phacoemulsification
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33061272
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S261565
work_keys_str_mv AT vannuffelstefaan cystoidmacularedemafollowingcataractsurgerywithlowenergyfemtosecondlaserversusconventionalphacoemulsification
AT claeysmatthiasf cystoidmacularedemafollowingcataractsurgerywithlowenergyfemtosecondlaserversusconventionalphacoemulsification
AT claeysmarnixh cystoidmacularedemafollowingcataractsurgerywithlowenergyfemtosecondlaserversusconventionalphacoemulsification