Gateway and journey of patients with cardiac amyloidosis

AIMS: Advances have been made over the last decade in the management of cardiac amyloidosis (CA), but a delayed diagnosis is still common. The aim of this study was to describe the journey to CA diagnosis from initial clinical and to analyse time to diagnosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 2001 and May 2019, 270 consecutive patients with CA diagnosed at Toulouse University Hospital were retrospectively included in this cross‐sectional study: 111 (41%) light chain amyloidosis, 122 (45%) wild‐type transthyretin amyloidosis, and 37 (14%) hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. CA onset occurred mostly with dyspnoea (50%) or systematic follow‐up (10%). The cardiologist was the first line specialist in 68% of patients, followed by the nephrologist (9%) and neurologist (8%). Patients encountered a median (minimum–maximum) number of two (1–7) physician specialists and performed a median (minimum–maximum) number of three (1–8) tests before diagnosis. Median delay between symptom onset and CA diagnosis was 8 [IQR 5–14], 10 [IQR 3–34], and 18 [IQR 4–49] months, respectively, in light chain amyloidosis, wild‐type transthyretin amyloidosis, and hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis subgroups (P = .060). Having performed electromyography or spirometry was associated with a longer delay in diagnosis in the overall population: odds ratio = 1.13; 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.24; and odds ratio = 1.13; 1.03 to 1.24, respectively, probably due to non‐specific initial symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: CA is a protean disease with various first line specialists causing a diagnostic wandering despite increasing medical community awareness. It requires a multidisciplinary specialist care networks to educate and manage symptoms and therapies.