Cargando…

Healthcare Resource Utilization of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Versus Meropenem for Ventilated Nosocomial Pneumonia from the Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind ASPECT-NP Trial

INTRODUCTION: Hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP and VABP) are associated with significant healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). This a priori, exploratory, secondary analysis from the ASPECT-NP clinical trial evaluated resource utilization among patients with ve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lodise, Thomas, Yang, Joe, Puzniak, Laura A., Dillon, Ryan, Kollef, Marin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32996064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00343-0
_version_ 1783588581974999040
author Lodise, Thomas
Yang, Joe
Puzniak, Laura A.
Dillon, Ryan
Kollef, Marin
author_facet Lodise, Thomas
Yang, Joe
Puzniak, Laura A.
Dillon, Ryan
Kollef, Marin
author_sort Lodise, Thomas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP and VABP) are associated with significant healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). This a priori, exploratory, secondary analysis from the ASPECT-NP clinical trial evaluated resource utilization among patients with ventilated HABP (vHABP)/VABP treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam or meropenem. METHODS: This analysis used data from the randomized, double-blind, noninferiority phase 3 ASPECT-NP trial of patients with vHABP/VABP randomized to receive ceftolozane/tazobactam 3 g (ceftolozane 2 g/tazobactam 1 g) or meropenem 1 g for 8–14 days. Day 28 outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and time to mechanical ventilation extubation in the microbiological intention-to-treat (mITT) population and in an HCRU population. The HCRU population, a subset of patients from the mITT population that were alive at day 28, was used to remove resource use bias influenced by mortality rates. RESULTS: Ceftolozane/tazobactam-treated versus meropenem-treated patients, respectively, had fewer deaths (20.1% vs. 25.5%), fewer hospital discharges (30.7% vs. 32.4%), and higher ICU discharges (60.0% vs. 58.3%) and extubations (51.9% vs. 48.2%) by day 28. In the HCRU population, adjusted LOS differences (95% confidence intervals) for ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with meropenem were 0.1 (− 1.4 to 1.6) hospitalization days, − 1.4 (− 2.9 to 0.2) ICU days, and − 0.9 (− 2.4 to 0.7) mechanical ventilation days. Patterns were similar among the VABP and Pseudomonas aeruginosa subgroups. CONCLUSION: Similar 28-day resource utilization outcomes were observed between ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem in the mITT population of patients from ASPECT-NP with vHABP/VABP due to gram-negative pathogens. ASPECT-NP was not powered to detect differences in resource utilization outcomes between treatment groups; however, numerical differences in ICU LOS and duration of mechanical ventilation were noted. Further study is needed to assess resource utilization in the real-world practice setting, especially among patients excluded from ASPECT-NP, including those with resistant P. aeruginosa infections. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02070757, registered February 25, 2014; EudraCT: 2012-002862-11. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40121-020-00343-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7524640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75246402020-09-30 Healthcare Resource Utilization of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Versus Meropenem for Ventilated Nosocomial Pneumonia from the Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind ASPECT-NP Trial Lodise, Thomas Yang, Joe Puzniak, Laura A. Dillon, Ryan Kollef, Marin Infect Dis Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP and VABP) are associated with significant healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). This a priori, exploratory, secondary analysis from the ASPECT-NP clinical trial evaluated resource utilization among patients with ventilated HABP (vHABP)/VABP treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam or meropenem. METHODS: This analysis used data from the randomized, double-blind, noninferiority phase 3 ASPECT-NP trial of patients with vHABP/VABP randomized to receive ceftolozane/tazobactam 3 g (ceftolozane 2 g/tazobactam 1 g) or meropenem 1 g for 8–14 days. Day 28 outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and time to mechanical ventilation extubation in the microbiological intention-to-treat (mITT) population and in an HCRU population. The HCRU population, a subset of patients from the mITT population that were alive at day 28, was used to remove resource use bias influenced by mortality rates. RESULTS: Ceftolozane/tazobactam-treated versus meropenem-treated patients, respectively, had fewer deaths (20.1% vs. 25.5%), fewer hospital discharges (30.7% vs. 32.4%), and higher ICU discharges (60.0% vs. 58.3%) and extubations (51.9% vs. 48.2%) by day 28. In the HCRU population, adjusted LOS differences (95% confidence intervals) for ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with meropenem were 0.1 (− 1.4 to 1.6) hospitalization days, − 1.4 (− 2.9 to 0.2) ICU days, and − 0.9 (− 2.4 to 0.7) mechanical ventilation days. Patterns were similar among the VABP and Pseudomonas aeruginosa subgroups. CONCLUSION: Similar 28-day resource utilization outcomes were observed between ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem in the mITT population of patients from ASPECT-NP with vHABP/VABP due to gram-negative pathogens. ASPECT-NP was not powered to detect differences in resource utilization outcomes between treatment groups; however, numerical differences in ICU LOS and duration of mechanical ventilation were noted. Further study is needed to assess resource utilization in the real-world practice setting, especially among patients excluded from ASPECT-NP, including those with resistant P. aeruginosa infections. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02070757, registered February 25, 2014; EudraCT: 2012-002862-11. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40121-020-00343-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-09-30 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7524640/ /pubmed/32996064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00343-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lodise, Thomas
Yang, Joe
Puzniak, Laura A.
Dillon, Ryan
Kollef, Marin
Healthcare Resource Utilization of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Versus Meropenem for Ventilated Nosocomial Pneumonia from the Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind ASPECT-NP Trial
title Healthcare Resource Utilization of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Versus Meropenem for Ventilated Nosocomial Pneumonia from the Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind ASPECT-NP Trial
title_full Healthcare Resource Utilization of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Versus Meropenem for Ventilated Nosocomial Pneumonia from the Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind ASPECT-NP Trial
title_fullStr Healthcare Resource Utilization of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Versus Meropenem for Ventilated Nosocomial Pneumonia from the Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind ASPECT-NP Trial
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare Resource Utilization of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Versus Meropenem for Ventilated Nosocomial Pneumonia from the Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind ASPECT-NP Trial
title_short Healthcare Resource Utilization of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Versus Meropenem for Ventilated Nosocomial Pneumonia from the Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind ASPECT-NP Trial
title_sort healthcare resource utilization of ceftolozane/tazobactam versus meropenem for ventilated nosocomial pneumonia from the randomized, controlled, double-blind aspect-np trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32996064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00343-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lodisethomas healthcareresourceutilizationofceftolozanetazobactamversusmeropenemforventilatednosocomialpneumoniafromtherandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindaspectnptrial
AT yangjoe healthcareresourceutilizationofceftolozanetazobactamversusmeropenemforventilatednosocomialpneumoniafromtherandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindaspectnptrial
AT puzniaklauraa healthcareresourceutilizationofceftolozanetazobactamversusmeropenemforventilatednosocomialpneumoniafromtherandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindaspectnptrial
AT dillonryan healthcareresourceutilizationofceftolozanetazobactamversusmeropenemforventilatednosocomialpneumoniafromtherandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindaspectnptrial
AT kollefmarin healthcareresourceutilizationofceftolozanetazobactamversusmeropenemforventilatednosocomialpneumoniafromtherandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindaspectnptrial