Cargando…
Laboratory biosafety measures involving SARS-CoV-2 and the classification as a Risk Group 3 biological agent
The current public health emergency surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, that is the illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has resulted in thousands of cases in Australia since 25 January 2020 when the first case was diagnosed. This emerging virus presents par...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33070960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2020.09.006 |
_version_ | 1783588589804716032 |
---|---|
author | Kaufer, Alexa M. Theis, Torsten Lau, Katherine A. Gray, Joanna L. Rawlinson, William D. |
author_facet | Kaufer, Alexa M. Theis, Torsten Lau, Katherine A. Gray, Joanna L. Rawlinson, William D. |
author_sort | Kaufer, Alexa M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The current public health emergency surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, that is the illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has resulted in thousands of cases in Australia since 25 January 2020 when the first case was diagnosed. This emerging virus presents particular hazards to researchers and laboratory staff in a clinical setting, highlighted by rapid and widespread global transmission. Based on the epidemiological and clinical data that have become available in mid-2020, we propose the interim classification of SARS-CoV-2 as a Risk Group 3 organism is reasonable, and discuss establishing Biosafety Level 3 (BSL-3) regulations accordingly. Despite its global spread, the reported mortality rate of SARS-CoV-2 ranging from 0.13% to 6.22% is considerably less than that of other Risk Group 4 agents including Ebola and Marburg viruses with fatality rates as high as 90%. In addition, studies have demonstrated that approximately 86% of patients presenting with severe courses of the disease are aged 70 years or above, with the presence of comorbid conditions such as cardiovascular and respiratory system diseases in the majority of all fatal cases. In contrary to recent discussions surrounding the protective and administrative measures needed in a laboratory, the emerging evidence surrounding mortality rate, distinct demographics of severe infections, and the presence of underlying diseases does not justify the categorisation of SARS-CoV-2 as a Risk Group 4 organism. This article summarises biosafety precautions, control measures and appropriate physical containment facilities required to minimise the risk of laboratory-acquired infections with SARS-CoV-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7524674 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75246742020-09-30 Laboratory biosafety measures involving SARS-CoV-2 and the classification as a Risk Group 3 biological agent Kaufer, Alexa M. Theis, Torsten Lau, Katherine A. Gray, Joanna L. Rawlinson, William D. Pathology FOCUS ON SARS-CoV-2 The current public health emergency surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, that is the illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has resulted in thousands of cases in Australia since 25 January 2020 when the first case was diagnosed. This emerging virus presents particular hazards to researchers and laboratory staff in a clinical setting, highlighted by rapid and widespread global transmission. Based on the epidemiological and clinical data that have become available in mid-2020, we propose the interim classification of SARS-CoV-2 as a Risk Group 3 organism is reasonable, and discuss establishing Biosafety Level 3 (BSL-3) regulations accordingly. Despite its global spread, the reported mortality rate of SARS-CoV-2 ranging from 0.13% to 6.22% is considerably less than that of other Risk Group 4 agents including Ebola and Marburg viruses with fatality rates as high as 90%. In addition, studies have demonstrated that approximately 86% of patients presenting with severe courses of the disease are aged 70 years or above, with the presence of comorbid conditions such as cardiovascular and respiratory system diseases in the majority of all fatal cases. In contrary to recent discussions surrounding the protective and administrative measures needed in a laboratory, the emerging evidence surrounding mortality rate, distinct demographics of severe infections, and the presence of underlying diseases does not justify the categorisation of SARS-CoV-2 as a Risk Group 4 organism. This article summarises biosafety precautions, control measures and appropriate physical containment facilities required to minimise the risk of laboratory-acquired infections with SARS-CoV-2. Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020-12 2020-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7524674/ /pubmed/33070960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2020.09.006 Text en © 2020 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | FOCUS ON SARS-CoV-2 Kaufer, Alexa M. Theis, Torsten Lau, Katherine A. Gray, Joanna L. Rawlinson, William D. Laboratory biosafety measures involving SARS-CoV-2 and the classification as a Risk Group 3 biological agent |
title | Laboratory biosafety measures involving SARS-CoV-2 and the classification as a Risk Group 3 biological agent |
title_full | Laboratory biosafety measures involving SARS-CoV-2 and the classification as a Risk Group 3 biological agent |
title_fullStr | Laboratory biosafety measures involving SARS-CoV-2 and the classification as a Risk Group 3 biological agent |
title_full_unstemmed | Laboratory biosafety measures involving SARS-CoV-2 and the classification as a Risk Group 3 biological agent |
title_short | Laboratory biosafety measures involving SARS-CoV-2 and the classification as a Risk Group 3 biological agent |
title_sort | laboratory biosafety measures involving sars-cov-2 and the classification as a risk group 3 biological agent |
topic | FOCUS ON SARS-CoV-2 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33070960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2020.09.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kauferalexam laboratorybiosafetymeasuresinvolvingsarscov2andtheclassificationasariskgroup3biologicalagent AT theistorsten laboratorybiosafetymeasuresinvolvingsarscov2andtheclassificationasariskgroup3biologicalagent AT laukatherinea laboratorybiosafetymeasuresinvolvingsarscov2andtheclassificationasariskgroup3biologicalagent AT grayjoannal laboratorybiosafetymeasuresinvolvingsarscov2andtheclassificationasariskgroup3biologicalagent AT rawlinsonwilliamd laboratorybiosafetymeasuresinvolvingsarscov2andtheclassificationasariskgroup3biologicalagent |