Cargando…

Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability

CONTEXT: By linking species of conservation concern to their abiotic and biotic requirements, habitat suitability models (HSM) can assist targeted conservation measures. Yet, conservation measures may fail if HSM are unable to predict crucial resources. HSM are typically developed using remotely sen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tschumi, Matthias, Scherler, Patrick, Fattebert, Julien, Naef-Daenzer, Beat, Grüebler, Martin U.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33071456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01103-8
_version_ 1783588592807837696
author Tschumi, Matthias
Scherler, Patrick
Fattebert, Julien
Naef-Daenzer, Beat
Grüebler, Martin U.
author_facet Tschumi, Matthias
Scherler, Patrick
Fattebert, Julien
Naef-Daenzer, Beat
Grüebler, Martin U.
author_sort Tschumi, Matthias
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: By linking species of conservation concern to their abiotic and biotic requirements, habitat suitability models (HSM) can assist targeted conservation measures. Yet, conservation measures may fail if HSM are unable to predict crucial resources. HSM are typically developed using remotely sensed land-cover classification data but not information on resources per se. OBJECTIVES: While a certain land-cover class may correlate with crucial resources in the area of calibration, political boundaries can abruptly alter these associations. We investigate this potential discrepancy in a well-known study system highly relevant for farmland bird conservation. METHODS: We compared land cover, land-use intensity and resource availability between plots of highest habitat suitability for little owls (Athene noctua) among two neighbouring, but politically separated areas (i.e. south-western Germany vs. northern Switzerland). RESULTS: Land cover and land-use richness did not differ between German and Swiss plots. Yet there were marked differences in terms of land-use intensity and the availability of resources. Land-use intensity was significantly higher and resource availability lower in Swiss compared to German plots. CONCLUSIONS: While accounting well for remotely sensed data such as land cover, HSM may fail to predict land-use intensity and resources across borders. The relationship between geodata used as proxies and ecologically relevant resources may differ according to history, policies and socio-cultural context, constraining the viability of HSM across political borders. This study emphasises the need for fine-scale resource assessments complementing landscape-scale suitability models. Conservation measures need to consider the availability of crucial resources and their socio-economic moderators to be effective. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10980-020-01103-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7524687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75246872020-10-14 Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability Tschumi, Matthias Scherler, Patrick Fattebert, Julien Naef-Daenzer, Beat Grüebler, Martin U. Landsc Ecol Research Article CONTEXT: By linking species of conservation concern to their abiotic and biotic requirements, habitat suitability models (HSM) can assist targeted conservation measures. Yet, conservation measures may fail if HSM are unable to predict crucial resources. HSM are typically developed using remotely sensed land-cover classification data but not information on resources per se. OBJECTIVES: While a certain land-cover class may correlate with crucial resources in the area of calibration, political boundaries can abruptly alter these associations. We investigate this potential discrepancy in a well-known study system highly relevant for farmland bird conservation. METHODS: We compared land cover, land-use intensity and resource availability between plots of highest habitat suitability for little owls (Athene noctua) among two neighbouring, but politically separated areas (i.e. south-western Germany vs. northern Switzerland). RESULTS: Land cover and land-use richness did not differ between German and Swiss plots. Yet there were marked differences in terms of land-use intensity and the availability of resources. Land-use intensity was significantly higher and resource availability lower in Swiss compared to German plots. CONCLUSIONS: While accounting well for remotely sensed data such as land cover, HSM may fail to predict land-use intensity and resources across borders. The relationship between geodata used as proxies and ecologically relevant resources may differ according to history, policies and socio-cultural context, constraining the viability of HSM across political borders. This study emphasises the need for fine-scale resource assessments complementing landscape-scale suitability models. Conservation measures need to consider the availability of crucial resources and their socio-economic moderators to be effective. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10980-020-01103-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2020-09-04 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7524687/ /pubmed/33071456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01103-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tschumi, Matthias
Scherler, Patrick
Fattebert, Julien
Naef-Daenzer, Beat
Grüebler, Martin U.
Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability
title Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability
title_full Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability
title_fullStr Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability
title_full_unstemmed Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability
title_short Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability
title_sort political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33071456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01103-8
work_keys_str_mv AT tschumimatthias politicalbordersimpactassociationsbetweenhabitatsuitabilitypredictionsandresourceavailability
AT scherlerpatrick politicalbordersimpactassociationsbetweenhabitatsuitabilitypredictionsandresourceavailability
AT fattebertjulien politicalbordersimpactassociationsbetweenhabitatsuitabilitypredictionsandresourceavailability
AT naefdaenzerbeat politicalbordersimpactassociationsbetweenhabitatsuitabilitypredictionsandresourceavailability
AT grueblermartinu politicalbordersimpactassociationsbetweenhabitatsuitabilitypredictionsandresourceavailability