Cargando…
Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability
CONTEXT: By linking species of conservation concern to their abiotic and biotic requirements, habitat suitability models (HSM) can assist targeted conservation measures. Yet, conservation measures may fail if HSM are unable to predict crucial resources. HSM are typically developed using remotely sen...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33071456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01103-8 |
_version_ | 1783588592807837696 |
---|---|
author | Tschumi, Matthias Scherler, Patrick Fattebert, Julien Naef-Daenzer, Beat Grüebler, Martin U. |
author_facet | Tschumi, Matthias Scherler, Patrick Fattebert, Julien Naef-Daenzer, Beat Grüebler, Martin U. |
author_sort | Tschumi, Matthias |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: By linking species of conservation concern to their abiotic and biotic requirements, habitat suitability models (HSM) can assist targeted conservation measures. Yet, conservation measures may fail if HSM are unable to predict crucial resources. HSM are typically developed using remotely sensed land-cover classification data but not information on resources per se. OBJECTIVES: While a certain land-cover class may correlate with crucial resources in the area of calibration, political boundaries can abruptly alter these associations. We investigate this potential discrepancy in a well-known study system highly relevant for farmland bird conservation. METHODS: We compared land cover, land-use intensity and resource availability between plots of highest habitat suitability for little owls (Athene noctua) among two neighbouring, but politically separated areas (i.e. south-western Germany vs. northern Switzerland). RESULTS: Land cover and land-use richness did not differ between German and Swiss plots. Yet there were marked differences in terms of land-use intensity and the availability of resources. Land-use intensity was significantly higher and resource availability lower in Swiss compared to German plots. CONCLUSIONS: While accounting well for remotely sensed data such as land cover, HSM may fail to predict land-use intensity and resources across borders. The relationship between geodata used as proxies and ecologically relevant resources may differ according to history, policies and socio-cultural context, constraining the viability of HSM across political borders. This study emphasises the need for fine-scale resource assessments complementing landscape-scale suitability models. Conservation measures need to consider the availability of crucial resources and their socio-economic moderators to be effective. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10980-020-01103-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7524687 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75246872020-10-14 Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability Tschumi, Matthias Scherler, Patrick Fattebert, Julien Naef-Daenzer, Beat Grüebler, Martin U. Landsc Ecol Research Article CONTEXT: By linking species of conservation concern to their abiotic and biotic requirements, habitat suitability models (HSM) can assist targeted conservation measures. Yet, conservation measures may fail if HSM are unable to predict crucial resources. HSM are typically developed using remotely sensed land-cover classification data but not information on resources per se. OBJECTIVES: While a certain land-cover class may correlate with crucial resources in the area of calibration, political boundaries can abruptly alter these associations. We investigate this potential discrepancy in a well-known study system highly relevant for farmland bird conservation. METHODS: We compared land cover, land-use intensity and resource availability between plots of highest habitat suitability for little owls (Athene noctua) among two neighbouring, but politically separated areas (i.e. south-western Germany vs. northern Switzerland). RESULTS: Land cover and land-use richness did not differ between German and Swiss plots. Yet there were marked differences in terms of land-use intensity and the availability of resources. Land-use intensity was significantly higher and resource availability lower in Swiss compared to German plots. CONCLUSIONS: While accounting well for remotely sensed data such as land cover, HSM may fail to predict land-use intensity and resources across borders. The relationship between geodata used as proxies and ecologically relevant resources may differ according to history, policies and socio-cultural context, constraining the viability of HSM across political borders. This study emphasises the need for fine-scale resource assessments complementing landscape-scale suitability models. Conservation measures need to consider the availability of crucial resources and their socio-economic moderators to be effective. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10980-020-01103-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2020-09-04 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7524687/ /pubmed/33071456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01103-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tschumi, Matthias Scherler, Patrick Fattebert, Julien Naef-Daenzer, Beat Grüebler, Martin U. Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability |
title | Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability |
title_full | Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability |
title_fullStr | Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability |
title_full_unstemmed | Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability |
title_short | Political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability |
title_sort | political borders impact associations between habitat suitability predictions and resource availability |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33071456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01103-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tschumimatthias politicalbordersimpactassociationsbetweenhabitatsuitabilitypredictionsandresourceavailability AT scherlerpatrick politicalbordersimpactassociationsbetweenhabitatsuitabilitypredictionsandresourceavailability AT fattebertjulien politicalbordersimpactassociationsbetweenhabitatsuitabilitypredictionsandresourceavailability AT naefdaenzerbeat politicalbordersimpactassociationsbetweenhabitatsuitabilitypredictionsandresourceavailability AT grueblermartinu politicalbordersimpactassociationsbetweenhabitatsuitabilitypredictionsandresourceavailability |