Cargando…
The effect of prophylactic surgery in survival and HRQoL in appendiceal NEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Long-term outcomes are understudied in patients with well-differentiated appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (WD-ANENs). We aimed to evaluate the validity of currently applied criteria for completion prophylactic right hemicolectomy (pRHC) and determine its association with patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32524502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02356-8 |
_version_ | 1783588620169379840 |
---|---|
author | Alexandraki, Krystallenia I. Kaltsas, Gregory Grozinsky-Glasberg, Simona Oleinikov, Kira Kos-Kudła, Beata Kogut, Angelika Srirajaskanthan, Rajaventhan Pizanias, Michail Poulia, Kalliopi-Anna Ferreira, Clara Weickert, Martin O. Daskalakis, Kosmas |
author_facet | Alexandraki, Krystallenia I. Kaltsas, Gregory Grozinsky-Glasberg, Simona Oleinikov, Kira Kos-Kudła, Beata Kogut, Angelika Srirajaskanthan, Rajaventhan Pizanias, Michail Poulia, Kalliopi-Anna Ferreira, Clara Weickert, Martin O. Daskalakis, Kosmas |
author_sort | Alexandraki, Krystallenia I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Long-term outcomes are understudied in patients with well-differentiated appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (WD-ANENs). We aimed to evaluate the validity of currently applied criteria for completion prophylactic right hemicolectomy (pRHC) and determine its association with patient outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: Eligible patients from five European referral centers were divided between those who underwent appendectomy alone and those who underwent completion pRHC. HRQoL EORTC-QLC-C30 questionnaires and cross-sectional imaging data were prospectively collected. Age- and sex-matched healthy controls were recruited for HRQoL analysis’ validation. RESULTS: We included 166 patients (119 women [71.2%]: mean age at baseline: 31 ± 16 years). Mean follow-up was 50.9 ± 54 months. Most patients (152 [92%]) had tumors ≤20 mm in size. Fifty-eight patients (34.9%) underwent pRHC that in final analysis was regarded as an overtreatment in 38/58 (65.5%). In multivariable analysis, tumor size >20 mm was the only independent predictor for lymph node (LN) involvement (p = 0.002). No mortality was reported, whereas 2-, 5- and 10-year recurrence-free survival in patients subjected to postoperative cross-sectional imaging (n = 136) was 98.5%, 97.8%, and 97.8%, respectively. Global HRQoL was not significantly impaired in patients with WD-ANEN compared with age- and sex-matched healthy individuals (median scores 0.83[0.08−1] vs 0.83[0.4−1], respectively; p = 0.929). Among patients with WD-ANEN impaired social functioning (p = 0.016), diarrhea (p = 0.003) and financial difficulties (0.024) were more frequently reported in the pRHC group. CONCLUSIONS: WD-ANEN is a low-malignant neoplasm with unconfirmed associated mortality, low recurrence rate, and overall preserved HRQoL. pRHC comes at a price of excessive surgery, functional HRQoL issues, and diarrhea. The value per se of a prophylactic surgical approach to patients with WD-ANENs <20 mm is challenged. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7524808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75248082020-10-14 The effect of prophylactic surgery in survival and HRQoL in appendiceal NEN Alexandraki, Krystallenia I. Kaltsas, Gregory Grozinsky-Glasberg, Simona Oleinikov, Kira Kos-Kudła, Beata Kogut, Angelika Srirajaskanthan, Rajaventhan Pizanias, Michail Poulia, Kalliopi-Anna Ferreira, Clara Weickert, Martin O. Daskalakis, Kosmas Endocrine Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Long-term outcomes are understudied in patients with well-differentiated appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (WD-ANENs). We aimed to evaluate the validity of currently applied criteria for completion prophylactic right hemicolectomy (pRHC) and determine its association with patient outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: Eligible patients from five European referral centers were divided between those who underwent appendectomy alone and those who underwent completion pRHC. HRQoL EORTC-QLC-C30 questionnaires and cross-sectional imaging data were prospectively collected. Age- and sex-matched healthy controls were recruited for HRQoL analysis’ validation. RESULTS: We included 166 patients (119 women [71.2%]: mean age at baseline: 31 ± 16 years). Mean follow-up was 50.9 ± 54 months. Most patients (152 [92%]) had tumors ≤20 mm in size. Fifty-eight patients (34.9%) underwent pRHC that in final analysis was regarded as an overtreatment in 38/58 (65.5%). In multivariable analysis, tumor size >20 mm was the only independent predictor for lymph node (LN) involvement (p = 0.002). No mortality was reported, whereas 2-, 5- and 10-year recurrence-free survival in patients subjected to postoperative cross-sectional imaging (n = 136) was 98.5%, 97.8%, and 97.8%, respectively. Global HRQoL was not significantly impaired in patients with WD-ANEN compared with age- and sex-matched healthy individuals (median scores 0.83[0.08−1] vs 0.83[0.4−1], respectively; p = 0.929). Among patients with WD-ANEN impaired social functioning (p = 0.016), diarrhea (p = 0.003) and financial difficulties (0.024) were more frequently reported in the pRHC group. CONCLUSIONS: WD-ANEN is a low-malignant neoplasm with unconfirmed associated mortality, low recurrence rate, and overall preserved HRQoL. pRHC comes at a price of excessive surgery, functional HRQoL issues, and diarrhea. The value per se of a prophylactic surgical approach to patients with WD-ANENs <20 mm is challenged. Springer US 2020-07-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7524808/ /pubmed/32524502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02356-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Alexandraki, Krystallenia I. Kaltsas, Gregory Grozinsky-Glasberg, Simona Oleinikov, Kira Kos-Kudła, Beata Kogut, Angelika Srirajaskanthan, Rajaventhan Pizanias, Michail Poulia, Kalliopi-Anna Ferreira, Clara Weickert, Martin O. Daskalakis, Kosmas The effect of prophylactic surgery in survival and HRQoL in appendiceal NEN |
title | The effect of prophylactic surgery in survival and HRQoL in appendiceal NEN |
title_full | The effect of prophylactic surgery in survival and HRQoL in appendiceal NEN |
title_fullStr | The effect of prophylactic surgery in survival and HRQoL in appendiceal NEN |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of prophylactic surgery in survival and HRQoL in appendiceal NEN |
title_short | The effect of prophylactic surgery in survival and HRQoL in appendiceal NEN |
title_sort | effect of prophylactic surgery in survival and hrqol in appendiceal nen |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32524502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02356-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alexandrakikrystalleniai theeffectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT kaltsasgregory theeffectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT grozinskyglasbergsimona theeffectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT oleinikovkira theeffectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT koskudłabeata theeffectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT kogutangelika theeffectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT srirajaskanthanrajaventhan theeffectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT pizaniasmichail theeffectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT pouliakalliopianna theeffectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT ferreiraclara theeffectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT weickertmartino theeffectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT daskalakiskosmas theeffectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT alexandrakikrystalleniai effectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT kaltsasgregory effectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT grozinskyglasbergsimona effectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT oleinikovkira effectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT koskudłabeata effectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT kogutangelika effectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT srirajaskanthanrajaventhan effectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT pizaniasmichail effectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT pouliakalliopianna effectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT ferreiraclara effectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT weickertmartino effectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen AT daskalakiskosmas effectofprophylacticsurgeryinsurvivalandhrqolinappendicealnen |