Cargando…

[(18)F]MPPF and [(18)F]FDG μPET imaging in rats: impact of transport and restraint stress

BACKGROUND: Stress exposure can significantly affect serotonergic signaling with a particular impact on 5-HT(1A) receptor expression. Positron emission tomography (PET) provides opportunities for molecular imaging of alterations in 5-HT(1A) receptor binding following stress exposure. Considering the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buchecker, Verena, Waldron, Ann-Marie, van Dijk, R. Maarten, Koska, Ines, Brendel, Matthias, von Ungern-Sternberg, Barbara, Lindner, Simon, Gildehaus, Franz Josef, Ziegler, Sibylle, Bartenstein, Peter, Potschka, Heidrun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32990819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00693-3
_version_ 1783588641182842880
author Buchecker, Verena
Waldron, Ann-Marie
van Dijk, R. Maarten
Koska, Ines
Brendel, Matthias
von Ungern-Sternberg, Barbara
Lindner, Simon
Gildehaus, Franz Josef
Ziegler, Sibylle
Bartenstein, Peter
Potschka, Heidrun
author_facet Buchecker, Verena
Waldron, Ann-Marie
van Dijk, R. Maarten
Koska, Ines
Brendel, Matthias
von Ungern-Sternberg, Barbara
Lindner, Simon
Gildehaus, Franz Josef
Ziegler, Sibylle
Bartenstein, Peter
Potschka, Heidrun
author_sort Buchecker, Verena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stress exposure can significantly affect serotonergic signaling with a particular impact on 5-HT(1A) receptor expression. Positron emission tomography (PET) provides opportunities for molecular imaging of alterations in 5-HT(1A) receptor binding following stress exposure. Considering the possible role of 5-HT(1A) receptors in stress coping mechanisms, respective imaging approaches are of particular interest. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For twelve consecutive days, Sprague Dawley rats were exposed to daily transport with a 1 h stay in a laboratory or daily transport plus 1 h restraint in a narrow tube. Following, animals were subjected to μPET imaging with 2′-methoxyphenyl-(N-2′-pyridinyl)-p-[(18)F]fluoro-benzamidoethylpiperazine ([(18)F]MPPF) and 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose ([(18)F]FDG). Behavioral and biochemical parameters were analyzed to obtain additional information. RESULTS: In rats with repeated transport, hippocampal [(18)F]MPPF binding exceeded that in the naive group, while no difference in [(18)F]FDG uptake was detected between the groups. A transient decline in body weight was observed in rats with transport or combined transport and restraint. Thereby, body weight development correlated with [(18)F]MPPF binding. CONCLUSIONS: Mild-to-moderate stress associated with daily transport and exposure to a laboratory environment can trigger significant alterations in hippocampal binding of the 5-HT(1A) receptor ligand [(18)F]MPPF. This finding indicates that utmost care is necessary to control and report transport and associated handling procedures for animals used in μPET studies analyzing the serotonergic system in order to enhance the robustness of conclusions and allow replicability of findings. In view of earlier studies indicating that an increase in hippocampal 5-HT(1A) receptor expression may be associated with a resilience to stress, it would be of interest to further evaluate 5-HT(1A) receptor imaging approaches as a candidate biomarker for the vulnerability to stress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7524912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75249122020-10-14 [(18)F]MPPF and [(18)F]FDG μPET imaging in rats: impact of transport and restraint stress Buchecker, Verena Waldron, Ann-Marie van Dijk, R. Maarten Koska, Ines Brendel, Matthias von Ungern-Sternberg, Barbara Lindner, Simon Gildehaus, Franz Josef Ziegler, Sibylle Bartenstein, Peter Potschka, Heidrun EJNMMI Res Short Communication BACKGROUND: Stress exposure can significantly affect serotonergic signaling with a particular impact on 5-HT(1A) receptor expression. Positron emission tomography (PET) provides opportunities for molecular imaging of alterations in 5-HT(1A) receptor binding following stress exposure. Considering the possible role of 5-HT(1A) receptors in stress coping mechanisms, respective imaging approaches are of particular interest. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For twelve consecutive days, Sprague Dawley rats were exposed to daily transport with a 1 h stay in a laboratory or daily transport plus 1 h restraint in a narrow tube. Following, animals were subjected to μPET imaging with 2′-methoxyphenyl-(N-2′-pyridinyl)-p-[(18)F]fluoro-benzamidoethylpiperazine ([(18)F]MPPF) and 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose ([(18)F]FDG). Behavioral and biochemical parameters were analyzed to obtain additional information. RESULTS: In rats with repeated transport, hippocampal [(18)F]MPPF binding exceeded that in the naive group, while no difference in [(18)F]FDG uptake was detected between the groups. A transient decline in body weight was observed in rats with transport or combined transport and restraint. Thereby, body weight development correlated with [(18)F]MPPF binding. CONCLUSIONS: Mild-to-moderate stress associated with daily transport and exposure to a laboratory environment can trigger significant alterations in hippocampal binding of the 5-HT(1A) receptor ligand [(18)F]MPPF. This finding indicates that utmost care is necessary to control and report transport and associated handling procedures for animals used in μPET studies analyzing the serotonergic system in order to enhance the robustness of conclusions and allow replicability of findings. In view of earlier studies indicating that an increase in hippocampal 5-HT(1A) receptor expression may be associated with a resilience to stress, it would be of interest to further evaluate 5-HT(1A) receptor imaging approaches as a candidate biomarker for the vulnerability to stress. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7524912/ /pubmed/32990819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00693-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Buchecker, Verena
Waldron, Ann-Marie
van Dijk, R. Maarten
Koska, Ines
Brendel, Matthias
von Ungern-Sternberg, Barbara
Lindner, Simon
Gildehaus, Franz Josef
Ziegler, Sibylle
Bartenstein, Peter
Potschka, Heidrun
[(18)F]MPPF and [(18)F]FDG μPET imaging in rats: impact of transport and restraint stress
title [(18)F]MPPF and [(18)F]FDG μPET imaging in rats: impact of transport and restraint stress
title_full [(18)F]MPPF and [(18)F]FDG μPET imaging in rats: impact of transport and restraint stress
title_fullStr [(18)F]MPPF and [(18)F]FDG μPET imaging in rats: impact of transport and restraint stress
title_full_unstemmed [(18)F]MPPF and [(18)F]FDG μPET imaging in rats: impact of transport and restraint stress
title_short [(18)F]MPPF and [(18)F]FDG μPET imaging in rats: impact of transport and restraint stress
title_sort [(18)f]mppf and [(18)f]fdg μpet imaging in rats: impact of transport and restraint stress
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32990819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00693-3
work_keys_str_mv AT bucheckerverena 18fmppfand18ffdgmpetimaginginratsimpactoftransportandrestraintstress
AT waldronannmarie 18fmppfand18ffdgmpetimaginginratsimpactoftransportandrestraintstress
AT vandijkrmaarten 18fmppfand18ffdgmpetimaginginratsimpactoftransportandrestraintstress
AT koskaines 18fmppfand18ffdgmpetimaginginratsimpactoftransportandrestraintstress
AT brendelmatthias 18fmppfand18ffdgmpetimaginginratsimpactoftransportandrestraintstress
AT vonungernsternbergbarbara 18fmppfand18ffdgmpetimaginginratsimpactoftransportandrestraintstress
AT lindnersimon 18fmppfand18ffdgmpetimaginginratsimpactoftransportandrestraintstress
AT gildehausfranzjosef 18fmppfand18ffdgmpetimaginginratsimpactoftransportandrestraintstress
AT zieglersibylle 18fmppfand18ffdgmpetimaginginratsimpactoftransportandrestraintstress
AT bartensteinpeter 18fmppfand18ffdgmpetimaginginratsimpactoftransportandrestraintstress
AT potschkaheidrun 18fmppfand18ffdgmpetimaginginratsimpactoftransportandrestraintstress