Cargando…

A review of technologies for collaborative online information seeking: On the contribution of collaborative argumentation

In everyday life, people seek, evaluate, and use online sources to underpin opinions and make decisions. While education must promote the skills people need to critically question the sourcing of online information, it is important, more generally, to understand how to successfully promote the acqui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mayweg-Paus, Elisabeth, Zimmermann, Maria, Le, Nguyen-Thinh, Pinkwart, Niels
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10345-7
_version_ 1783588667104690176
author Mayweg-Paus, Elisabeth
Zimmermann, Maria
Le, Nguyen-Thinh
Pinkwart, Niels
author_facet Mayweg-Paus, Elisabeth
Zimmermann, Maria
Le, Nguyen-Thinh
Pinkwart, Niels
author_sort Mayweg-Paus, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description In everyday life, people seek, evaluate, and use online sources to underpin opinions and make decisions. While education must promote the skills people need to critically question the sourcing of online information, it is important, more generally, to understand how to successfully promote the acquisition of any skills related to seeking online information. This review outlines technologies that aim to support users when they collaboratively seek online information. Upon integrating psychological–pedagogical approaches on trust in and the sourcing of online information, argumentation, and computer-supported collaborative learning, we reviewed the literature (N = 95 journal articles) on technologies for collaborative online information seeking. The technologies we identified either addressed collaborative online information seeking as an exclusive process for searching for online information or, alternatively, addressed online information seeking within the context of a more complex learning process. Our review was driven by three main research questions: We aimed to understand whether and how the studies considered 1) the role of trust and critical questioning in the sourcing of online information, 2) the learning processes at play when information seekers engage in collaborative argumentation, and 3) what affordances are offered by technologies that support users’ collaborative seeking of online information. The reviewed articles that focused exclusively on technologies for seeking online information primarily addressed aspects of cooperation (e.g., task management), whereas articles that focused on technologies for integrating the processes of information seeking into the entire learning processes instead highlighted aspects of collaborative argumentation (e.g., exchange of multiple perspectives and critical questioning in argumentation). Seven of the articles referred to trust as an aspect of seekers’ sourcing strategies. We emphasize how researchers’, users’, and technology developers’ consideration of collaborative argumentation could expand the benefits of technological support for seeking online information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7525077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75250772020-09-30 A review of technologies for collaborative online information seeking: On the contribution of collaborative argumentation Mayweg-Paus, Elisabeth Zimmermann, Maria Le, Nguyen-Thinh Pinkwart, Niels Educ Inf Technol (Dordr) Article In everyday life, people seek, evaluate, and use online sources to underpin opinions and make decisions. While education must promote the skills people need to critically question the sourcing of online information, it is important, more generally, to understand how to successfully promote the acquisition of any skills related to seeking online information. This review outlines technologies that aim to support users when they collaboratively seek online information. Upon integrating psychological–pedagogical approaches on trust in and the sourcing of online information, argumentation, and computer-supported collaborative learning, we reviewed the literature (N = 95 journal articles) on technologies for collaborative online information seeking. The technologies we identified either addressed collaborative online information seeking as an exclusive process for searching for online information or, alternatively, addressed online information seeking within the context of a more complex learning process. Our review was driven by three main research questions: We aimed to understand whether and how the studies considered 1) the role of trust and critical questioning in the sourcing of online information, 2) the learning processes at play when information seekers engage in collaborative argumentation, and 3) what affordances are offered by technologies that support users’ collaborative seeking of online information. The reviewed articles that focused exclusively on technologies for seeking online information primarily addressed aspects of cooperation (e.g., task management), whereas articles that focused on technologies for integrating the processes of information seeking into the entire learning processes instead highlighted aspects of collaborative argumentation (e.g., exchange of multiple perspectives and critical questioning in argumentation). Seven of the articles referred to trust as an aspect of seekers’ sourcing strategies. We emphasize how researchers’, users’, and technology developers’ consideration of collaborative argumentation could expand the benefits of technological support for seeking online information. Springer US 2020-09-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7525077/ /pubmed/33013181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10345-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Mayweg-Paus, Elisabeth
Zimmermann, Maria
Le, Nguyen-Thinh
Pinkwart, Niels
A review of technologies for collaborative online information seeking: On the contribution of collaborative argumentation
title A review of technologies for collaborative online information seeking: On the contribution of collaborative argumentation
title_full A review of technologies for collaborative online information seeking: On the contribution of collaborative argumentation
title_fullStr A review of technologies for collaborative online information seeking: On the contribution of collaborative argumentation
title_full_unstemmed A review of technologies for collaborative online information seeking: On the contribution of collaborative argumentation
title_short A review of technologies for collaborative online information seeking: On the contribution of collaborative argumentation
title_sort review of technologies for collaborative online information seeking: on the contribution of collaborative argumentation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10345-7
work_keys_str_mv AT maywegpauselisabeth areviewoftechnologiesforcollaborativeonlineinformationseekingonthecontributionofcollaborativeargumentation
AT zimmermannmaria areviewoftechnologiesforcollaborativeonlineinformationseekingonthecontributionofcollaborativeargumentation
AT lenguyenthinh areviewoftechnologiesforcollaborativeonlineinformationseekingonthecontributionofcollaborativeargumentation
AT pinkwartniels areviewoftechnologiesforcollaborativeonlineinformationseekingonthecontributionofcollaborativeargumentation
AT maywegpauselisabeth reviewoftechnologiesforcollaborativeonlineinformationseekingonthecontributionofcollaborativeargumentation
AT zimmermannmaria reviewoftechnologiesforcollaborativeonlineinformationseekingonthecontributionofcollaborativeargumentation
AT lenguyenthinh reviewoftechnologiesforcollaborativeonlineinformationseekingonthecontributionofcollaborativeargumentation
AT pinkwartniels reviewoftechnologiesforcollaborativeonlineinformationseekingonthecontributionofcollaborativeargumentation