Cargando…

Spatial Mechanisms for Segregation of Competing Sounds, and a Breakdown in Spatial Hearing

We live in complex auditory environments, in which we are confronted with multiple competing sounds, including the cacophony of talkers in busy markets, classrooms, offices, etc. The purpose of this article is to synthesize observations from a series of experiments that focused on how spatial hearin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Middlebrooks, John C., Waters, Michael F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33041763
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.571095
_version_ 1783588671123881984
author Middlebrooks, John C.
Waters, Michael F.
author_facet Middlebrooks, John C.
Waters, Michael F.
author_sort Middlebrooks, John C.
collection PubMed
description We live in complex auditory environments, in which we are confronted with multiple competing sounds, including the cacophony of talkers in busy markets, classrooms, offices, etc. The purpose of this article is to synthesize observations from a series of experiments that focused on how spatial hearing might aid in disentangling interleaved sequences of sounds. The experiments were unified by a non-verbal task, “rhythmic masking release”, which was applied to psychophysical studies in humans and cats and to cortical physiology in anesthetized cats. Human and feline listeners could segregate competing sequences of sounds from sources that were separated by as little as ∼10°. Similarly, single neurons in the cat primary auditory cortex tended to synchronize selectively to sound sequences from one of two competing sources, again with spatial resolution of ∼10°. The spatial resolution of spatial stream segregation varied widely depending on the binaural and monaural acoustical cues that were available in various experimental conditions. This is in contrast to a measure of basic sound-source localization, the minimum audible angle, which showed largely constant acuity across those conditions. The differential utilization of acoustical cues suggests that the central spatial mechanisms for stream segregation differ from those for sound localization. The highest-acuity spatial stream segregation was derived from interaural time and level differences. Brainstem processing of those cues is thought to rely heavily on normal function of a voltage-gated potassium channel, Kv3.3. A family was studied having a dominant negative mutation in the gene for that channel. Affected family members exhibited severe loss of sensitivity for interaural time and level differences, which almost certainly would degrade their ability to segregate competing sounds in real-world auditory scenes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7525094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75250942020-10-09 Spatial Mechanisms for Segregation of Competing Sounds, and a Breakdown in Spatial Hearing Middlebrooks, John C. Waters, Michael F. Front Neurosci Neuroscience We live in complex auditory environments, in which we are confronted with multiple competing sounds, including the cacophony of talkers in busy markets, classrooms, offices, etc. The purpose of this article is to synthesize observations from a series of experiments that focused on how spatial hearing might aid in disentangling interleaved sequences of sounds. The experiments were unified by a non-verbal task, “rhythmic masking release”, which was applied to psychophysical studies in humans and cats and to cortical physiology in anesthetized cats. Human and feline listeners could segregate competing sequences of sounds from sources that were separated by as little as ∼10°. Similarly, single neurons in the cat primary auditory cortex tended to synchronize selectively to sound sequences from one of two competing sources, again with spatial resolution of ∼10°. The spatial resolution of spatial stream segregation varied widely depending on the binaural and monaural acoustical cues that were available in various experimental conditions. This is in contrast to a measure of basic sound-source localization, the minimum audible angle, which showed largely constant acuity across those conditions. The differential utilization of acoustical cues suggests that the central spatial mechanisms for stream segregation differ from those for sound localization. The highest-acuity spatial stream segregation was derived from interaural time and level differences. Brainstem processing of those cues is thought to rely heavily on normal function of a voltage-gated potassium channel, Kv3.3. A family was studied having a dominant negative mutation in the gene for that channel. Affected family members exhibited severe loss of sensitivity for interaural time and level differences, which almost certainly would degrade their ability to segregate competing sounds in real-world auditory scenes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7525094/ /pubmed/33041763 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.571095 Text en Copyright © 2020 Middlebrooks and Waters. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Middlebrooks, John C.
Waters, Michael F.
Spatial Mechanisms for Segregation of Competing Sounds, and a Breakdown in Spatial Hearing
title Spatial Mechanisms for Segregation of Competing Sounds, and a Breakdown in Spatial Hearing
title_full Spatial Mechanisms for Segregation of Competing Sounds, and a Breakdown in Spatial Hearing
title_fullStr Spatial Mechanisms for Segregation of Competing Sounds, and a Breakdown in Spatial Hearing
title_full_unstemmed Spatial Mechanisms for Segregation of Competing Sounds, and a Breakdown in Spatial Hearing
title_short Spatial Mechanisms for Segregation of Competing Sounds, and a Breakdown in Spatial Hearing
title_sort spatial mechanisms for segregation of competing sounds, and a breakdown in spatial hearing
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33041763
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.571095
work_keys_str_mv AT middlebrooksjohnc spatialmechanismsforsegregationofcompetingsoundsandabreakdowninspatialhearing
AT watersmichaelf spatialmechanismsforsegregationofcompetingsoundsandabreakdowninspatialhearing