Cargando…
Digital PCR for the Analysis of MYC Copy Number Variation in Lung Cancer
BACKGROUND: MYC (v-myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog) is one of the most frequently amplified genes in lung tumors. For the analysis of gene copy number variations, dPCR (digital PCR) is an appropriate tool. The aim of our study was the assessment of dPCR for the detection of MYC cop...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4176376 |
_version_ | 1783588719534538752 |
---|---|
author | Brik, Alexander Weber, Daniel G. Casjens, Swaantje Rozynek, Peter Meier, Swetlana Behrens, Thomas Stamatis, Georgios Darwiche, Kaid Theegarten, Dirk Brüning, Thomas Johnen, Georg |
author_facet | Brik, Alexander Weber, Daniel G. Casjens, Swaantje Rozynek, Peter Meier, Swetlana Behrens, Thomas Stamatis, Georgios Darwiche, Kaid Theegarten, Dirk Brüning, Thomas Johnen, Georg |
author_sort | Brik, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: MYC (v-myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog) is one of the most frequently amplified genes in lung tumors. For the analysis of gene copy number variations, dPCR (digital PCR) is an appropriate tool. The aim of our study was the assessment of dPCR for the detection of MYC copy number variations (CNV) in lung tissue considering clinicopathological parameters. Material and Methods. MYC status was analyzed with dPCR as well as qPCR (quantitative PCR) using gDNA (genomic DNA) from tumor and adjacent nontumor tissue samples of lung cancer patients. The performance of MYC was estimated based on the AUC (area under curve). RESULTS: The results of the MYC amplification correlated significantly between dPCR and qPCR (r(S) = 0.81, P < 0.0001). The MYC copy number revealed by dPCR showed statistically significant differences between tumor and adjacent nontumor tissues. For discrimination, a sensitivity of 43% and a specificity of 99% were calculated, representing 55 true-positive and one false-positive tests. No statistically significant differences could be observed for age, sex, and smoking status or the clinicopathological parameters (histological subtype, grade, and stage). CONCLUSION: The results of the study show that dPCR is an accurate and reliable method for the determination of MYC copy numbers. The application is characterized by high specificity and moderate sensitivity. MYC amplification is a common event in lung cancer patients, and it is indicated that the determination of the MYC status might be useful in clinical diagnostics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7525309 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75253092020-10-02 Digital PCR for the Analysis of MYC Copy Number Variation in Lung Cancer Brik, Alexander Weber, Daniel G. Casjens, Swaantje Rozynek, Peter Meier, Swetlana Behrens, Thomas Stamatis, Georgios Darwiche, Kaid Theegarten, Dirk Brüning, Thomas Johnen, Georg Dis Markers Research Article BACKGROUND: MYC (v-myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog) is one of the most frequently amplified genes in lung tumors. For the analysis of gene copy number variations, dPCR (digital PCR) is an appropriate tool. The aim of our study was the assessment of dPCR for the detection of MYC copy number variations (CNV) in lung tissue considering clinicopathological parameters. Material and Methods. MYC status was analyzed with dPCR as well as qPCR (quantitative PCR) using gDNA (genomic DNA) from tumor and adjacent nontumor tissue samples of lung cancer patients. The performance of MYC was estimated based on the AUC (area under curve). RESULTS: The results of the MYC amplification correlated significantly between dPCR and qPCR (r(S) = 0.81, P < 0.0001). The MYC copy number revealed by dPCR showed statistically significant differences between tumor and adjacent nontumor tissues. For discrimination, a sensitivity of 43% and a specificity of 99% were calculated, representing 55 true-positive and one false-positive tests. No statistically significant differences could be observed for age, sex, and smoking status or the clinicopathological parameters (histological subtype, grade, and stage). CONCLUSION: The results of the study show that dPCR is an accurate and reliable method for the determination of MYC copy numbers. The application is characterized by high specificity and moderate sensitivity. MYC amplification is a common event in lung cancer patients, and it is indicated that the determination of the MYC status might be useful in clinical diagnostics. Hindawi 2020-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7525309/ /pubmed/33014186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4176376 Text en Copyright © 2020 Alexander Brik et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Brik, Alexander Weber, Daniel G. Casjens, Swaantje Rozynek, Peter Meier, Swetlana Behrens, Thomas Stamatis, Georgios Darwiche, Kaid Theegarten, Dirk Brüning, Thomas Johnen, Georg Digital PCR for the Analysis of MYC Copy Number Variation in Lung Cancer |
title | Digital PCR for the Analysis of MYC Copy Number Variation in Lung Cancer |
title_full | Digital PCR for the Analysis of MYC Copy Number Variation in Lung Cancer |
title_fullStr | Digital PCR for the Analysis of MYC Copy Number Variation in Lung Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital PCR for the Analysis of MYC Copy Number Variation in Lung Cancer |
title_short | Digital PCR for the Analysis of MYC Copy Number Variation in Lung Cancer |
title_sort | digital pcr for the analysis of myc copy number variation in lung cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4176376 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brikalexander digitalpcrfortheanalysisofmyccopynumbervariationinlungcancer AT weberdanielg digitalpcrfortheanalysisofmyccopynumbervariationinlungcancer AT casjensswaantje digitalpcrfortheanalysisofmyccopynumbervariationinlungcancer AT rozynekpeter digitalpcrfortheanalysisofmyccopynumbervariationinlungcancer AT meierswetlana digitalpcrfortheanalysisofmyccopynumbervariationinlungcancer AT behrensthomas digitalpcrfortheanalysisofmyccopynumbervariationinlungcancer AT stamatisgeorgios digitalpcrfortheanalysisofmyccopynumbervariationinlungcancer AT darwichekaid digitalpcrfortheanalysisofmyccopynumbervariationinlungcancer AT theegartendirk digitalpcrfortheanalysisofmyccopynumbervariationinlungcancer AT bruningthomas digitalpcrfortheanalysisofmyccopynumbervariationinlungcancer AT johnengeorg digitalpcrfortheanalysisofmyccopynumbervariationinlungcancer |