Cargando…
Therapeutic HL-Contact Lens versus Standard Bandage Contact Lens for Corneal Edema: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study
INTRODUCTION: To compare the safety and efficacy of the Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens versus a standard bandage contact lens (PureVision B&L) for chronic corneal edema. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover study. Chronic corneal edema patients were randomized to one of two arms....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8410920 |
_version_ | 1783588720261201920 |
---|---|
author | Daphna, Ofer Mimouni, Michael Keshet, Yariv Ben Ishai, Meydan Barequet, Irina S. Knyazer, Boris Mrukwa-Kominek, Ewa Zarnowski, Tomasz Chen-Zion, Malca Marcovich, Arie |
author_facet | Daphna, Ofer Mimouni, Michael Keshet, Yariv Ben Ishai, Meydan Barequet, Irina S. Knyazer, Boris Mrukwa-Kominek, Ewa Zarnowski, Tomasz Chen-Zion, Malca Marcovich, Arie |
author_sort | Daphna, Ofer |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To compare the safety and efficacy of the Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens versus a standard bandage contact lens (PureVision B&L) for chronic corneal edema. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover study. Chronic corneal edema patients were randomized to one of two arms. The first arm was fitted with the Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens while the second arm was fitted with a standard soft bandage contact lens. Both arms were treated with 5% sodium chloride 6 times a day. After a 7-day treatment period, there was a 7-day washout period, after which the arms were crossed over. Patients were evaluated at days 0 (baseline), 7 (following first treatment allocation), 14 (following washout), and 21 (following second treatment allocation). The primary outcomes were 3 lines of BCVA (best corrected visual acuity) improvement. RESULTS: In total, 49 patients were enrolled. There was significantly greater BCVA improvement rate >3 lines (30.4% versus 17.4%, P=0.04) in the Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens group. The mean change in BCVA lines was significantly greater for the Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens (3.4 ± 6.7 versus 0.9 ± 2.3, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens was associated with a higher chance for significant visual acuity improvement when compared to a standard bandage contact lens combined with 5% sodium chloride. This trial is registered with NCT02660151. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7525312 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75253122020-10-02 Therapeutic HL-Contact Lens versus Standard Bandage Contact Lens for Corneal Edema: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study Daphna, Ofer Mimouni, Michael Keshet, Yariv Ben Ishai, Meydan Barequet, Irina S. Knyazer, Boris Mrukwa-Kominek, Ewa Zarnowski, Tomasz Chen-Zion, Malca Marcovich, Arie J Ophthalmol Research Article INTRODUCTION: To compare the safety and efficacy of the Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens versus a standard bandage contact lens (PureVision B&L) for chronic corneal edema. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover study. Chronic corneal edema patients were randomized to one of two arms. The first arm was fitted with the Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens while the second arm was fitted with a standard soft bandage contact lens. Both arms were treated with 5% sodium chloride 6 times a day. After a 7-day treatment period, there was a 7-day washout period, after which the arms were crossed over. Patients were evaluated at days 0 (baseline), 7 (following first treatment allocation), 14 (following washout), and 21 (following second treatment allocation). The primary outcomes were 3 lines of BCVA (best corrected visual acuity) improvement. RESULTS: In total, 49 patients were enrolled. There was significantly greater BCVA improvement rate >3 lines (30.4% versus 17.4%, P=0.04) in the Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens group. The mean change in BCVA lines was significantly greater for the Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens (3.4 ± 6.7 versus 0.9 ± 2.3, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens was associated with a higher chance for significant visual acuity improvement when compared to a standard bandage contact lens combined with 5% sodium chloride. This trial is registered with NCT02660151. Hindawi 2020-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7525312/ /pubmed/33014443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8410920 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ofer Daphna et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Daphna, Ofer Mimouni, Michael Keshet, Yariv Ben Ishai, Meydan Barequet, Irina S. Knyazer, Boris Mrukwa-Kominek, Ewa Zarnowski, Tomasz Chen-Zion, Malca Marcovich, Arie Therapeutic HL-Contact Lens versus Standard Bandage Contact Lens for Corneal Edema: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study |
title | Therapeutic HL-Contact Lens versus Standard Bandage Contact Lens for Corneal Edema: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study |
title_full | Therapeutic HL-Contact Lens versus Standard Bandage Contact Lens for Corneal Edema: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study |
title_fullStr | Therapeutic HL-Contact Lens versus Standard Bandage Contact Lens for Corneal Edema: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Therapeutic HL-Contact Lens versus Standard Bandage Contact Lens for Corneal Edema: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study |
title_short | Therapeutic HL-Contact Lens versus Standard Bandage Contact Lens for Corneal Edema: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study |
title_sort | therapeutic hl-contact lens versus standard bandage contact lens for corneal edema: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8410920 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daphnaofer therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy AT mimounimichael therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy AT keshetyariv therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy AT benishaimeydan therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy AT barequetirinas therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy AT knyazerboris therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy AT mrukwakominekewa therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy AT zarnowskitomasz therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy AT chenzionmalca therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy AT marcovicharie therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy |