Cargando…

Therapeutic HL-Contact Lens versus Standard Bandage Contact Lens for Corneal Edema: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study

INTRODUCTION: To compare the safety and efficacy of the Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens versus a standard bandage contact lens (PureVision B&L) for chronic corneal edema. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover study. Chronic corneal edema patients were randomized to one of two arms....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daphna, Ofer, Mimouni, Michael, Keshet, Yariv, Ben Ishai, Meydan, Barequet, Irina S., Knyazer, Boris, Mrukwa-Kominek, Ewa, Zarnowski, Tomasz, Chen-Zion, Malca, Marcovich, Arie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8410920
_version_ 1783588720261201920
author Daphna, Ofer
Mimouni, Michael
Keshet, Yariv
Ben Ishai, Meydan
Barequet, Irina S.
Knyazer, Boris
Mrukwa-Kominek, Ewa
Zarnowski, Tomasz
Chen-Zion, Malca
Marcovich, Arie
author_facet Daphna, Ofer
Mimouni, Michael
Keshet, Yariv
Ben Ishai, Meydan
Barequet, Irina S.
Knyazer, Boris
Mrukwa-Kominek, Ewa
Zarnowski, Tomasz
Chen-Zion, Malca
Marcovich, Arie
author_sort Daphna, Ofer
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To compare the safety and efficacy of the Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens versus a standard bandage contact lens (PureVision B&L) for chronic corneal edema. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover study. Chronic corneal edema patients were randomized to one of two arms. The first arm was fitted with the Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens while the second arm was fitted with a standard soft bandage contact lens. Both arms were treated with 5% sodium chloride 6 times a day. After a 7-day treatment period, there was a 7-day washout period, after which the arms were crossed over. Patients were evaluated at days 0 (baseline), 7 (following first treatment allocation), 14 (following washout), and 21 (following second treatment allocation). The primary outcomes were 3 lines of BCVA (best corrected visual acuity) improvement. RESULTS: In total, 49 patients were enrolled. There was significantly greater BCVA improvement rate >3 lines (30.4% versus 17.4%, P=0.04) in the Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens group. The mean change in BCVA lines was significantly greater for the Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens (3.4 ± 6.7 versus 0.9 ± 2.3, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens was associated with a higher chance for significant visual acuity improvement when compared to a standard bandage contact lens combined with 5% sodium chloride. This trial is registered with NCT02660151.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7525312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75253122020-10-02 Therapeutic HL-Contact Lens versus Standard Bandage Contact Lens for Corneal Edema: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study Daphna, Ofer Mimouni, Michael Keshet, Yariv Ben Ishai, Meydan Barequet, Irina S. Knyazer, Boris Mrukwa-Kominek, Ewa Zarnowski, Tomasz Chen-Zion, Malca Marcovich, Arie J Ophthalmol Research Article INTRODUCTION: To compare the safety and efficacy of the Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens versus a standard bandage contact lens (PureVision B&L) for chronic corneal edema. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover study. Chronic corneal edema patients were randomized to one of two arms. The first arm was fitted with the Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens while the second arm was fitted with a standard soft bandage contact lens. Both arms were treated with 5% sodium chloride 6 times a day. After a 7-day treatment period, there was a 7-day washout period, after which the arms were crossed over. Patients were evaluated at days 0 (baseline), 7 (following first treatment allocation), 14 (following washout), and 21 (following second treatment allocation). The primary outcomes were 3 lines of BCVA (best corrected visual acuity) improvement. RESULTS: In total, 49 patients were enrolled. There was significantly greater BCVA improvement rate >3 lines (30.4% versus 17.4%, P=0.04) in the Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens group. The mean change in BCVA lines was significantly greater for the Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens (3.4 ± 6.7 versus 0.9 ± 2.3, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The Therapeutic Hyper-CL™ lens was associated with a higher chance for significant visual acuity improvement when compared to a standard bandage contact lens combined with 5% sodium chloride. This trial is registered with NCT02660151. Hindawi 2020-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7525312/ /pubmed/33014443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8410920 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ofer Daphna et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Daphna, Ofer
Mimouni, Michael
Keshet, Yariv
Ben Ishai, Meydan
Barequet, Irina S.
Knyazer, Boris
Mrukwa-Kominek, Ewa
Zarnowski, Tomasz
Chen-Zion, Malca
Marcovich, Arie
Therapeutic HL-Contact Lens versus Standard Bandage Contact Lens for Corneal Edema: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study
title Therapeutic HL-Contact Lens versus Standard Bandage Contact Lens for Corneal Edema: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study
title_full Therapeutic HL-Contact Lens versus Standard Bandage Contact Lens for Corneal Edema: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study
title_fullStr Therapeutic HL-Contact Lens versus Standard Bandage Contact Lens for Corneal Edema: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic HL-Contact Lens versus Standard Bandage Contact Lens for Corneal Edema: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study
title_short Therapeutic HL-Contact Lens versus Standard Bandage Contact Lens for Corneal Edema: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study
title_sort therapeutic hl-contact lens versus standard bandage contact lens for corneal edema: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8410920
work_keys_str_mv AT daphnaofer therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT mimounimichael therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT keshetyariv therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT benishaimeydan therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT barequetirinas therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT knyazerboris therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT mrukwakominekewa therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT zarnowskitomasz therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT chenzionmalca therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT marcovicharie therapeutichlcontactlensversusstandardbandagecontactlensforcornealedemaaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossoverstudy