Cargando…
Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Nursing Education: Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) is the use of computer technology to create an interactive three-dimensional (3D) world, which gives users a sense of spatial presence. In nursing education, VR has been used to help optimize teaching and learning processes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32930664 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18290 |
_version_ | 1783588732470820864 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Feng-Qin Leng, Yu-Fei Ge, Jian-Feng Wang, Dan-Wen Li, Cheng Chen, Bin Sun, Zhi-Ling |
author_facet | Chen, Feng-Qin Leng, Yu-Fei Ge, Jian-Feng Wang, Dan-Wen Li, Cheng Chen, Bin Sun, Zhi-Ling |
author_sort | Chen, Feng-Qin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) is the use of computer technology to create an interactive three-dimensional (3D) world, which gives users a sense of spatial presence. In nursing education, VR has been used to help optimize teaching and learning processes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of VR in nursing education in the areas of knowledge, skills, satisfaction, confidence, and performance time. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of VR in nursing education based on the Cochrane methodology. An electronic literature search using the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), up to December 2019 was conducted to identify studies that reported the effectiveness of VR on knowledge, skills, satisfaction, confidence, and performance time. The study selection and data extraction were carried out by two independent reviewers. The methodological quality of the selected studies was determined using the Cochrane criteria for risk-of-bias assessment. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies, including 821 participants, were selected for the final analysis. We found that VR was more effective than the control conditions in improving knowledge (standard mean difference [SMD]=0.58, 95% CI 0.41-0.75, P<.001, I(2)=47%). However, there was no difference between VR and the control conditions in skills (SMD=0.01, 95% CI –0.24 to 0.26, P=.93, I(2)=37%), satisfaction (SMD=0.01, 95% CI –0.79 to 0.80, P=.99, I(2)=86%), confidence (SMD=0.00, 95% CI –0.28 to 0.27, P=.99, I(2)=0%), and performance time (SMD=–0.55, 95% CI –2.04 to 0.94, P=.47, I(2)=97%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that VR can effectively improve knowledge in nursing education, but it was not more effective than other education methods in areas of skills, satisfaction, confidence, and performance time. Further rigorous studies with a larger sample size are warranted to confirm these results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7525398 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75253982020-10-15 Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Nursing Education: Meta-Analysis Chen, Feng-Qin Leng, Yu-Fei Ge, Jian-Feng Wang, Dan-Wen Li, Cheng Chen, Bin Sun, Zhi-Ling J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) is the use of computer technology to create an interactive three-dimensional (3D) world, which gives users a sense of spatial presence. In nursing education, VR has been used to help optimize teaching and learning processes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of VR in nursing education in the areas of knowledge, skills, satisfaction, confidence, and performance time. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of VR in nursing education based on the Cochrane methodology. An electronic literature search using the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), up to December 2019 was conducted to identify studies that reported the effectiveness of VR on knowledge, skills, satisfaction, confidence, and performance time. The study selection and data extraction were carried out by two independent reviewers. The methodological quality of the selected studies was determined using the Cochrane criteria for risk-of-bias assessment. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies, including 821 participants, were selected for the final analysis. We found that VR was more effective than the control conditions in improving knowledge (standard mean difference [SMD]=0.58, 95% CI 0.41-0.75, P<.001, I(2)=47%). However, there was no difference between VR and the control conditions in skills (SMD=0.01, 95% CI –0.24 to 0.26, P=.93, I(2)=37%), satisfaction (SMD=0.01, 95% CI –0.79 to 0.80, P=.99, I(2)=86%), confidence (SMD=0.00, 95% CI –0.28 to 0.27, P=.99, I(2)=0%), and performance time (SMD=–0.55, 95% CI –2.04 to 0.94, P=.47, I(2)=97%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that VR can effectively improve knowledge in nursing education, but it was not more effective than other education methods in areas of skills, satisfaction, confidence, and performance time. Further rigorous studies with a larger sample size are warranted to confirm these results. JMIR Publications 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7525398/ /pubmed/32930664 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18290 Text en ©Feng-Qin Chen, Yu-Fei Leng, Jian-Feng Ge, Dan-Wen Wang, Cheng Li, Bin Chen, Zhi-Ling Sun. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 15.09.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Chen, Feng-Qin Leng, Yu-Fei Ge, Jian-Feng Wang, Dan-Wen Li, Cheng Chen, Bin Sun, Zhi-Ling Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Nursing Education: Meta-Analysis |
title | Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Nursing Education: Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Nursing Education: Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Nursing Education: Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Nursing Education: Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Nursing Education: Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | effectiveness of virtual reality in nursing education: meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32930664 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18290 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenfengqin effectivenessofvirtualrealityinnursingeducationmetaanalysis AT lengyufei effectivenessofvirtualrealityinnursingeducationmetaanalysis AT gejianfeng effectivenessofvirtualrealityinnursingeducationmetaanalysis AT wangdanwen effectivenessofvirtualrealityinnursingeducationmetaanalysis AT licheng effectivenessofvirtualrealityinnursingeducationmetaanalysis AT chenbin effectivenessofvirtualrealityinnursingeducationmetaanalysis AT sunzhiling effectivenessofvirtualrealityinnursingeducationmetaanalysis |