Cargando…
Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer
The purpose of this study is to compare diagnostic performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version (v) 2.1 and 2.0 for detection of Gleason Score (GS) ≥ 7 prostate cancer on MRI. Three experienced radiologists provided PI-RADS v2.0 scores and at least 12 months later v2.1...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32994502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72544-z |
_version_ | 1783588739303342080 |
---|---|
author | Rudolph, Madhuri Monique Baur, Alexander Daniel Jacques Cash, Hannes Haas, Matthias Mahjoub, Samy Hartenstein, Alexander Hamm, Charlie Alexander Beetz, Nick Lasse Konietschke, Frank Hamm, Bernd Asbach, Patrick Penzkofer, Tobias |
author_facet | Rudolph, Madhuri Monique Baur, Alexander Daniel Jacques Cash, Hannes Haas, Matthias Mahjoub, Samy Hartenstein, Alexander Hamm, Charlie Alexander Beetz, Nick Lasse Konietschke, Frank Hamm, Bernd Asbach, Patrick Penzkofer, Tobias |
author_sort | Rudolph, Madhuri Monique |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study is to compare diagnostic performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version (v) 2.1 and 2.0 for detection of Gleason Score (GS) ≥ 7 prostate cancer on MRI. Three experienced radiologists provided PI-RADS v2.0 scores and at least 12 months later v2.1 scores on lesions in 333 prostate MRI examinations acquired between 2012 and 2015. Diagnostic performance was assessed retrospectively by using MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy and 10-core systematic biopsy as the reference. From a total of 359 lesions, GS ≥ 7 tumor was present in 135 lesions (37.60%). Area under the ROC curve (AUC) revealed slightly lower values for peripheral zone (PZ) and transition zone (TZ) scoring in v2.1, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. A significant number of score 2 lesions in the TZ were downgraded to score 1 in v2.1 showing 0% GS ≥ 7 tumor (0/11). The newly introduced diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) upgrading rule in v2.1 was applied in 6 lesions from a total of 143 TZ lesions (4.2%). In summary, PI-RADS v2.1 showed no statistically significant differences in overall diagnostic performance of TZ and PZ scoring compared to v2.0. Downgraded BPH nodules showed favorable cancer frequencies. The new DWI upgrading rule for TZ lesions was applied in only few cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7525456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75254562020-10-01 Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer Rudolph, Madhuri Monique Baur, Alexander Daniel Jacques Cash, Hannes Haas, Matthias Mahjoub, Samy Hartenstein, Alexander Hamm, Charlie Alexander Beetz, Nick Lasse Konietschke, Frank Hamm, Bernd Asbach, Patrick Penzkofer, Tobias Sci Rep Article The purpose of this study is to compare diagnostic performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version (v) 2.1 and 2.0 for detection of Gleason Score (GS) ≥ 7 prostate cancer on MRI. Three experienced radiologists provided PI-RADS v2.0 scores and at least 12 months later v2.1 scores on lesions in 333 prostate MRI examinations acquired between 2012 and 2015. Diagnostic performance was assessed retrospectively by using MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy and 10-core systematic biopsy as the reference. From a total of 359 lesions, GS ≥ 7 tumor was present in 135 lesions (37.60%). Area under the ROC curve (AUC) revealed slightly lower values for peripheral zone (PZ) and transition zone (TZ) scoring in v2.1, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. A significant number of score 2 lesions in the TZ were downgraded to score 1 in v2.1 showing 0% GS ≥ 7 tumor (0/11). The newly introduced diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) upgrading rule in v2.1 was applied in 6 lesions from a total of 143 TZ lesions (4.2%). In summary, PI-RADS v2.1 showed no statistically significant differences in overall diagnostic performance of TZ and PZ scoring compared to v2.0. Downgraded BPH nodules showed favorable cancer frequencies. The new DWI upgrading rule for TZ lesions was applied in only few cases. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7525456/ /pubmed/32994502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72544-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Rudolph, Madhuri Monique Baur, Alexander Daniel Jacques Cash, Hannes Haas, Matthias Mahjoub, Samy Hartenstein, Alexander Hamm, Charlie Alexander Beetz, Nick Lasse Konietschke, Frank Hamm, Bernd Asbach, Patrick Penzkofer, Tobias Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer |
title | Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer |
title_full | Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer |
title_short | Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of pi-rads version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32994502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72544-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rudolphmadhurimonique diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer AT bauralexanderdanieljacques diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer AT cashhannes diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer AT haasmatthias diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer AT mahjoubsamy diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer AT hartensteinalexander diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer AT hammcharliealexander diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer AT beetznicklasse diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer AT konietschkefrank diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer AT hammbernd diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer AT asbachpatrick diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer AT penzkofertobias diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer |