Cargando…

Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer

The purpose of this study is to compare diagnostic performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version (v) 2.1 and 2.0 for detection of Gleason Score (GS) ≥ 7 prostate cancer on MRI. Three experienced radiologists provided PI-RADS v2.0 scores and at least 12 months later v2.1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rudolph, Madhuri Monique, Baur, Alexander Daniel Jacques, Cash, Hannes, Haas, Matthias, Mahjoub, Samy, Hartenstein, Alexander, Hamm, Charlie Alexander, Beetz, Nick Lasse, Konietschke, Frank, Hamm, Bernd, Asbach, Patrick, Penzkofer, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32994502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72544-z
_version_ 1783588739303342080
author Rudolph, Madhuri Monique
Baur, Alexander Daniel Jacques
Cash, Hannes
Haas, Matthias
Mahjoub, Samy
Hartenstein, Alexander
Hamm, Charlie Alexander
Beetz, Nick Lasse
Konietschke, Frank
Hamm, Bernd
Asbach, Patrick
Penzkofer, Tobias
author_facet Rudolph, Madhuri Monique
Baur, Alexander Daniel Jacques
Cash, Hannes
Haas, Matthias
Mahjoub, Samy
Hartenstein, Alexander
Hamm, Charlie Alexander
Beetz, Nick Lasse
Konietschke, Frank
Hamm, Bernd
Asbach, Patrick
Penzkofer, Tobias
author_sort Rudolph, Madhuri Monique
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study is to compare diagnostic performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version (v) 2.1 and 2.0 for detection of Gleason Score (GS) ≥ 7 prostate cancer on MRI. Three experienced radiologists provided PI-RADS v2.0 scores and at least 12 months later v2.1 scores on lesions in 333 prostate MRI examinations acquired between 2012 and 2015. Diagnostic performance was assessed retrospectively by using MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy and 10-core systematic biopsy as the reference. From a total of 359 lesions, GS ≥ 7 tumor was present in 135 lesions (37.60%). Area under the ROC curve (AUC) revealed slightly lower values for peripheral zone (PZ) and transition zone (TZ) scoring in v2.1, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. A significant number of score 2 lesions in the TZ were downgraded to score 1 in v2.1 showing 0% GS ≥ 7 tumor (0/11). The newly introduced diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) upgrading rule in v2.1 was applied in 6 lesions from a total of 143 TZ lesions (4.2%). In summary, PI-RADS v2.1 showed no statistically significant differences in overall diagnostic performance of TZ and PZ scoring compared to v2.0. Downgraded BPH nodules showed favorable cancer frequencies. The new DWI upgrading rule for TZ lesions was applied in only few cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7525456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75254562020-10-01 Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer Rudolph, Madhuri Monique Baur, Alexander Daniel Jacques Cash, Hannes Haas, Matthias Mahjoub, Samy Hartenstein, Alexander Hamm, Charlie Alexander Beetz, Nick Lasse Konietschke, Frank Hamm, Bernd Asbach, Patrick Penzkofer, Tobias Sci Rep Article The purpose of this study is to compare diagnostic performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version (v) 2.1 and 2.0 for detection of Gleason Score (GS) ≥ 7 prostate cancer on MRI. Three experienced radiologists provided PI-RADS v2.0 scores and at least 12 months later v2.1 scores on lesions in 333 prostate MRI examinations acquired between 2012 and 2015. Diagnostic performance was assessed retrospectively by using MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy and 10-core systematic biopsy as the reference. From a total of 359 lesions, GS ≥ 7 tumor was present in 135 lesions (37.60%). Area under the ROC curve (AUC) revealed slightly lower values for peripheral zone (PZ) and transition zone (TZ) scoring in v2.1, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. A significant number of score 2 lesions in the TZ were downgraded to score 1 in v2.1 showing 0% GS ≥ 7 tumor (0/11). The newly introduced diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) upgrading rule in v2.1 was applied in 6 lesions from a total of 143 TZ lesions (4.2%). In summary, PI-RADS v2.1 showed no statistically significant differences in overall diagnostic performance of TZ and PZ scoring compared to v2.0. Downgraded BPH nodules showed favorable cancer frequencies. The new DWI upgrading rule for TZ lesions was applied in only few cases. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7525456/ /pubmed/32994502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72544-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Rudolph, Madhuri Monique
Baur, Alexander Daniel Jacques
Cash, Hannes
Haas, Matthias
Mahjoub, Samy
Hartenstein, Alexander
Hamm, Charlie Alexander
Beetz, Nick Lasse
Konietschke, Frank
Hamm, Bernd
Asbach, Patrick
Penzkofer, Tobias
Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer
title Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer
title_full Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer
title_fullStr Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer
title_short Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer
title_sort diagnostic performance of pi-rads version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32994502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72544-z
work_keys_str_mv AT rudolphmadhurimonique diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer
AT bauralexanderdanieljacques diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer
AT cashhannes diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer
AT haasmatthias diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer
AT mahjoubsamy diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer
AT hartensteinalexander diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer
AT hammcharliealexander diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer
AT beetznicklasse diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer
AT konietschkefrank diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer
AT hammbernd diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer
AT asbachpatrick diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer
AT penzkofertobias diagnosticperformanceofpiradsversion21comparedtoversion20fordetectionofperipheralandtransitionzoneprostatecancer