Cargando…
Machine learning prediction in cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis
Several machine learning (ML) algorithms have been increasingly utilized for cardiovascular disease prediction. We aim to assess and summarize the overall predictive ability of ML algorithms in cardiovascular diseases. A comprehensive search strategy was designed and executed within the MEDLINE, Emb...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32994452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72685-1 |
_version_ | 1783588746819534848 |
---|---|
author | Krittanawong, Chayakrit Virk, Hafeez Ul Hassan Bangalore, Sripal Wang, Zhen Johnson, Kipp W. Pinotti, Rachel Zhang, HongJu Kaplin, Scott Narasimhan, Bharat Kitai, Takeshi Baber, Usman Halperin, Jonathan L. Tang, W. H. Wilson |
author_facet | Krittanawong, Chayakrit Virk, Hafeez Ul Hassan Bangalore, Sripal Wang, Zhen Johnson, Kipp W. Pinotti, Rachel Zhang, HongJu Kaplin, Scott Narasimhan, Bharat Kitai, Takeshi Baber, Usman Halperin, Jonathan L. Tang, W. H. Wilson |
author_sort | Krittanawong, Chayakrit |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several machine learning (ML) algorithms have been increasingly utilized for cardiovascular disease prediction. We aim to assess and summarize the overall predictive ability of ML algorithms in cardiovascular diseases. A comprehensive search strategy was designed and executed within the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases from database inception through March 15, 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of the predictive ability of ML algorithms of coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke, and cardiac arrhythmias. Of 344 total studies identified, 103 cohorts, with a total of 3,377,318 individuals, met our inclusion criteria. For the prediction of coronary artery disease, boosting algorithms had a pooled area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% CI 0.84–0.91), and custom-built algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.85–0.97). For the prediction of stroke, support vector machine (SVM) algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.81–0.97), boosting algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.81–0.96), and convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.83–0.95). Although inadequate studies for each algorithm for meta-analytic methodology for both heart failure and cardiac arrhythmias because the confidence intervals overlap between different methods, showing no difference, SVM may outperform other algorithms in these areas. The predictive ability of ML algorithms in cardiovascular diseases is promising, particularly SVM and boosting algorithms. However, there is heterogeneity among ML algorithms in terms of multiple parameters. This information may assist clinicians in how to interpret data and implement optimal algorithms for their dataset. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7525515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75255152020-10-01 Machine learning prediction in cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis Krittanawong, Chayakrit Virk, Hafeez Ul Hassan Bangalore, Sripal Wang, Zhen Johnson, Kipp W. Pinotti, Rachel Zhang, HongJu Kaplin, Scott Narasimhan, Bharat Kitai, Takeshi Baber, Usman Halperin, Jonathan L. Tang, W. H. Wilson Sci Rep Article Several machine learning (ML) algorithms have been increasingly utilized for cardiovascular disease prediction. We aim to assess and summarize the overall predictive ability of ML algorithms in cardiovascular diseases. A comprehensive search strategy was designed and executed within the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases from database inception through March 15, 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of the predictive ability of ML algorithms of coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke, and cardiac arrhythmias. Of 344 total studies identified, 103 cohorts, with a total of 3,377,318 individuals, met our inclusion criteria. For the prediction of coronary artery disease, boosting algorithms had a pooled area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% CI 0.84–0.91), and custom-built algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.85–0.97). For the prediction of stroke, support vector machine (SVM) algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.81–0.97), boosting algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.81–0.96), and convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.83–0.95). Although inadequate studies for each algorithm for meta-analytic methodology for both heart failure and cardiac arrhythmias because the confidence intervals overlap between different methods, showing no difference, SVM may outperform other algorithms in these areas. The predictive ability of ML algorithms in cardiovascular diseases is promising, particularly SVM and boosting algorithms. However, there is heterogeneity among ML algorithms in terms of multiple parameters. This information may assist clinicians in how to interpret data and implement optimal algorithms for their dataset. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7525515/ /pubmed/32994452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72685-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Krittanawong, Chayakrit Virk, Hafeez Ul Hassan Bangalore, Sripal Wang, Zhen Johnson, Kipp W. Pinotti, Rachel Zhang, HongJu Kaplin, Scott Narasimhan, Bharat Kitai, Takeshi Baber, Usman Halperin, Jonathan L. Tang, W. H. Wilson Machine learning prediction in cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis |
title | Machine learning prediction in cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Machine learning prediction in cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Machine learning prediction in cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning prediction in cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Machine learning prediction in cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | machine learning prediction in cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32994452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72685-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krittanawongchayakrit machinelearningpredictionincardiovasculardiseasesametaanalysis AT virkhafeezulhassan machinelearningpredictionincardiovasculardiseasesametaanalysis AT bangaloresripal machinelearningpredictionincardiovasculardiseasesametaanalysis AT wangzhen machinelearningpredictionincardiovasculardiseasesametaanalysis AT johnsonkippw machinelearningpredictionincardiovasculardiseasesametaanalysis AT pinottirachel machinelearningpredictionincardiovasculardiseasesametaanalysis AT zhanghongju machinelearningpredictionincardiovasculardiseasesametaanalysis AT kaplinscott machinelearningpredictionincardiovasculardiseasesametaanalysis AT narasimhanbharat machinelearningpredictionincardiovasculardiseasesametaanalysis AT kitaitakeshi machinelearningpredictionincardiovasculardiseasesametaanalysis AT baberusman machinelearningpredictionincardiovasculardiseasesametaanalysis AT halperinjonathanl machinelearningpredictionincardiovasculardiseasesametaanalysis AT tangwhwilson machinelearningpredictionincardiovasculardiseasesametaanalysis |