Cargando…

Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: The clinical effectiveness of a ‘rule-out’ acute coronary syndrome (ACS) strategy for emergency department patients with chest pain, incorporating a single undetectable high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) taken at presentation, together with a non-ischaemic ECG, remains unknown....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlton, Edward Watts, Ingram, Jenny, Taylor, Hazel, Glynn, Joel, Kandiyali, Rebecca, Campbell, Sarah, Beasant, Lucy, Aziz, Shahid, Beresford, Peter, Kendall, Jason, Reuben, Adam, Smith, Jason E, Chapman, Rebecca, Creanor, Siobhan, Benger, Jonathan Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32371401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316692
_version_ 1783588768563855360
author Carlton, Edward Watts
Ingram, Jenny
Taylor, Hazel
Glynn, Joel
Kandiyali, Rebecca
Campbell, Sarah
Beasant, Lucy
Aziz, Shahid
Beresford, Peter
Kendall, Jason
Reuben, Adam
Smith, Jason E
Chapman, Rebecca
Creanor, Siobhan
Benger, Jonathan Richard
author_facet Carlton, Edward Watts
Ingram, Jenny
Taylor, Hazel
Glynn, Joel
Kandiyali, Rebecca
Campbell, Sarah
Beasant, Lucy
Aziz, Shahid
Beresford, Peter
Kendall, Jason
Reuben, Adam
Smith, Jason E
Chapman, Rebecca
Creanor, Siobhan
Benger, Jonathan Richard
author_sort Carlton, Edward Watts
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The clinical effectiveness of a ‘rule-out’ acute coronary syndrome (ACS) strategy for emergency department patients with chest pain, incorporating a single undetectable high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) taken at presentation, together with a non-ischaemic ECG, remains unknown. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial, across eight hospitals in the UK, aimed to establish the clinical effectiveness of an undetectable hs-cTn and ECG (limit of detection and ECG discharge (LoDED)) discharge strategy. Eligible adult patients presented with chest pain; the treating clinician intended to perform investigations to rule out an ACS; the initial ECG was non-ischaemic; and peak symptoms occurred <6 hours previously. Participants were randomised 1:1 to either the LoDED strategy or the usual rule-out strategy. The primary outcome was discharge from the hospital within 4 hours of arrival, without a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) within 30 days. RESULTS: Between June 2018 and March 2019, 632 patients were randomised; 3 were later withdrawn. Of 629 patients (age 53.8 (SD 16.1) years, 41% women), 7% had a MACE within 30 days. For the LoDED strategy, 141 of 309 (46%) patients were discharged within 4 hours, without MACE within 30 days, and for usual care, 114 of 311 (37%); pooled adjusted OR 1.58 (95% CI 0.84 to 2.98). No patient with an initial undetectable hs-cTn had a MACE within 30 days. CONCLUSION: The LoDED strategy facilitates safe early discharge in >40% of patients with chest pain. Clinical effectiveness is variable when compared with existing rule-out strategies and influenced by wider system factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN86184521.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7525793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75257932020-10-19 Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial Carlton, Edward Watts Ingram, Jenny Taylor, Hazel Glynn, Joel Kandiyali, Rebecca Campbell, Sarah Beasant, Lucy Aziz, Shahid Beresford, Peter Kendall, Jason Reuben, Adam Smith, Jason E Chapman, Rebecca Creanor, Siobhan Benger, Jonathan Richard Heart Coronary Artery Disease INTRODUCTION: The clinical effectiveness of a ‘rule-out’ acute coronary syndrome (ACS) strategy for emergency department patients with chest pain, incorporating a single undetectable high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) taken at presentation, together with a non-ischaemic ECG, remains unknown. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial, across eight hospitals in the UK, aimed to establish the clinical effectiveness of an undetectable hs-cTn and ECG (limit of detection and ECG discharge (LoDED)) discharge strategy. Eligible adult patients presented with chest pain; the treating clinician intended to perform investigations to rule out an ACS; the initial ECG was non-ischaemic; and peak symptoms occurred <6 hours previously. Participants were randomised 1:1 to either the LoDED strategy or the usual rule-out strategy. The primary outcome was discharge from the hospital within 4 hours of arrival, without a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) within 30 days. RESULTS: Between June 2018 and March 2019, 632 patients were randomised; 3 were later withdrawn. Of 629 patients (age 53.8 (SD 16.1) years, 41% women), 7% had a MACE within 30 days. For the LoDED strategy, 141 of 309 (46%) patients were discharged within 4 hours, without MACE within 30 days, and for usual care, 114 of 311 (37%); pooled adjusted OR 1.58 (95% CI 0.84 to 2.98). No patient with an initial undetectable hs-cTn had a MACE within 30 days. CONCLUSION: The LoDED strategy facilitates safe early discharge in >40% of patients with chest pain. Clinical effectiveness is variable when compared with existing rule-out strategies and influenced by wider system factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN86184521. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10 2020-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7525793/ /pubmed/32371401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316692 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Coronary Artery Disease
Carlton, Edward Watts
Ingram, Jenny
Taylor, Hazel
Glynn, Joel
Kandiyali, Rebecca
Campbell, Sarah
Beasant, Lucy
Aziz, Shahid
Beresford, Peter
Kendall, Jason
Reuben, Adam
Smith, Jason E
Chapman, Rebecca
Creanor, Siobhan
Benger, Jonathan Richard
Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial
title Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial
title_full Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial
title_short Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial
title_sort limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial
topic Coronary Artery Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32371401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316692
work_keys_str_mv AT carltonedwardwatts limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ingramjenny limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT taylorhazel limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT glynnjoel limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kandiyalirebecca limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT campbellsarah limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT beasantlucy limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT azizshahid limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT beresfordpeter limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kendalljason limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT reubenadam limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT smithjasone limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chapmanrebecca limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT creanorsiobhan limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bengerjonathanrichard limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial