Cargando…
Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: The clinical effectiveness of a ‘rule-out’ acute coronary syndrome (ACS) strategy for emergency department patients with chest pain, incorporating a single undetectable high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) taken at presentation, together with a non-ischaemic ECG, remains unknown....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32371401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316692 |
_version_ | 1783588768563855360 |
---|---|
author | Carlton, Edward Watts Ingram, Jenny Taylor, Hazel Glynn, Joel Kandiyali, Rebecca Campbell, Sarah Beasant, Lucy Aziz, Shahid Beresford, Peter Kendall, Jason Reuben, Adam Smith, Jason E Chapman, Rebecca Creanor, Siobhan Benger, Jonathan Richard |
author_facet | Carlton, Edward Watts Ingram, Jenny Taylor, Hazel Glynn, Joel Kandiyali, Rebecca Campbell, Sarah Beasant, Lucy Aziz, Shahid Beresford, Peter Kendall, Jason Reuben, Adam Smith, Jason E Chapman, Rebecca Creanor, Siobhan Benger, Jonathan Richard |
author_sort | Carlton, Edward Watts |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The clinical effectiveness of a ‘rule-out’ acute coronary syndrome (ACS) strategy for emergency department patients with chest pain, incorporating a single undetectable high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) taken at presentation, together with a non-ischaemic ECG, remains unknown. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial, across eight hospitals in the UK, aimed to establish the clinical effectiveness of an undetectable hs-cTn and ECG (limit of detection and ECG discharge (LoDED)) discharge strategy. Eligible adult patients presented with chest pain; the treating clinician intended to perform investigations to rule out an ACS; the initial ECG was non-ischaemic; and peak symptoms occurred <6 hours previously. Participants were randomised 1:1 to either the LoDED strategy or the usual rule-out strategy. The primary outcome was discharge from the hospital within 4 hours of arrival, without a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) within 30 days. RESULTS: Between June 2018 and March 2019, 632 patients were randomised; 3 were later withdrawn. Of 629 patients (age 53.8 (SD 16.1) years, 41% women), 7% had a MACE within 30 days. For the LoDED strategy, 141 of 309 (46%) patients were discharged within 4 hours, without MACE within 30 days, and for usual care, 114 of 311 (37%); pooled adjusted OR 1.58 (95% CI 0.84 to 2.98). No patient with an initial undetectable hs-cTn had a MACE within 30 days. CONCLUSION: The LoDED strategy facilitates safe early discharge in >40% of patients with chest pain. Clinical effectiveness is variable when compared with existing rule-out strategies and influenced by wider system factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN86184521. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7525793 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75257932020-10-19 Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial Carlton, Edward Watts Ingram, Jenny Taylor, Hazel Glynn, Joel Kandiyali, Rebecca Campbell, Sarah Beasant, Lucy Aziz, Shahid Beresford, Peter Kendall, Jason Reuben, Adam Smith, Jason E Chapman, Rebecca Creanor, Siobhan Benger, Jonathan Richard Heart Coronary Artery Disease INTRODUCTION: The clinical effectiveness of a ‘rule-out’ acute coronary syndrome (ACS) strategy for emergency department patients with chest pain, incorporating a single undetectable high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) taken at presentation, together with a non-ischaemic ECG, remains unknown. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial, across eight hospitals in the UK, aimed to establish the clinical effectiveness of an undetectable hs-cTn and ECG (limit of detection and ECG discharge (LoDED)) discharge strategy. Eligible adult patients presented with chest pain; the treating clinician intended to perform investigations to rule out an ACS; the initial ECG was non-ischaemic; and peak symptoms occurred <6 hours previously. Participants were randomised 1:1 to either the LoDED strategy or the usual rule-out strategy. The primary outcome was discharge from the hospital within 4 hours of arrival, without a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) within 30 days. RESULTS: Between June 2018 and March 2019, 632 patients were randomised; 3 were later withdrawn. Of 629 patients (age 53.8 (SD 16.1) years, 41% women), 7% had a MACE within 30 days. For the LoDED strategy, 141 of 309 (46%) patients were discharged within 4 hours, without MACE within 30 days, and for usual care, 114 of 311 (37%); pooled adjusted OR 1.58 (95% CI 0.84 to 2.98). No patient with an initial undetectable hs-cTn had a MACE within 30 days. CONCLUSION: The LoDED strategy facilitates safe early discharge in >40% of patients with chest pain. Clinical effectiveness is variable when compared with existing rule-out strategies and influenced by wider system factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN86184521. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10 2020-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7525793/ /pubmed/32371401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316692 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Coronary Artery Disease Carlton, Edward Watts Ingram, Jenny Taylor, Hazel Glynn, Joel Kandiyali, Rebecca Campbell, Sarah Beasant, Lucy Aziz, Shahid Beresford, Peter Kendall, Jason Reuben, Adam Smith, Jason E Chapman, Rebecca Creanor, Siobhan Benger, Jonathan Richard Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial |
title | Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial |
topic | Coronary Artery Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32371401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316692 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carltonedwardwatts limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ingramjenny limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT taylorhazel limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT glynnjoel limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kandiyalirebecca limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT campbellsarah limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT beasantlucy limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT azizshahid limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT beresfordpeter limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kendalljason limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT reubenadam limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT smithjasone limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT chapmanrebecca limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT creanorsiobhan limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bengerjonathanrichard limitofdetectionoftroponindischargestrategyversususualcarerandomisedcontrolledtrial |