Cargando…

TAVI—thick on technology but thin on evidence

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as one of the most popularly deployed interventional innovations of recent times. After addressing the inoperable and high-risk patients, it is application is being extended to intermediate and low-risk category. There is some disquiet about...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sarkar, Kunal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33061032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12055-018-0731-2
_version_ 1783588775430979584
author Sarkar, Kunal
author_facet Sarkar, Kunal
author_sort Sarkar, Kunal
collection PubMed
description Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as one of the most popularly deployed interventional innovations of recent times. After addressing the inoperable and high-risk patients, it is application is being extended to intermediate and low-risk category. There is some disquiet about the strength of evidence on which the clinical application is based. Durability and pacemaker requirement are also areas of concern. This review highlights the areas of concern on these aspects. There is also a need to address these deficiencies in future trials and also bring updated database reports in the public domain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7525850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75258502020-10-13 TAVI—thick on technology but thin on evidence Sarkar, Kunal Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Review Article Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as one of the most popularly deployed interventional innovations of recent times. After addressing the inoperable and high-risk patients, it is application is being extended to intermediate and low-risk category. There is some disquiet about the strength of evidence on which the clinical application is based. Durability and pacemaker requirement are also areas of concern. This review highlights the areas of concern on these aspects. There is also a need to address these deficiencies in future trials and also bring updated database reports in the public domain. Springer Singapore 2018-10-17 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7525850/ /pubmed/33061032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12055-018-0731-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Sarkar, Kunal
TAVI—thick on technology but thin on evidence
title TAVI—thick on technology but thin on evidence
title_full TAVI—thick on technology but thin on evidence
title_fullStr TAVI—thick on technology but thin on evidence
title_full_unstemmed TAVI—thick on technology but thin on evidence
title_short TAVI—thick on technology but thin on evidence
title_sort tavi—thick on technology but thin on evidence
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33061032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12055-018-0731-2
work_keys_str_mv AT sarkarkunal tavithickontechnologybutthinonevidence