Cargando…
Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and the antegrade technique in the management of unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is used after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Based on existing studies, intrahepatic (IH) approaches are preferred in patients with dilated IH bile ducts. Both ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04758-5 |
_version_ | 1783588779604312064 |
---|---|
author | Liao, Ye Giovannini, Marc Zhong, Ning Xiao, Tingyue Sheng, Shiyun Wu, Yufan Zhang, Jingjing Wang, Sheng Liu, Xiang Sun, Siyu Guo, Jintao |
author_facet | Liao, Ye Giovannini, Marc Zhong, Ning Xiao, Tingyue Sheng, Shiyun Wu, Yufan Zhang, Jingjing Wang, Sheng Liu, Xiang Sun, Siyu Guo, Jintao |
author_sort | Liao, Ye |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is used after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Based on existing studies, intrahepatic (IH) approaches are preferred in patients with dilated IH bile ducts. Both ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) and ultrasound-guided antegrade treatment (EUS-AG) are appropriate for patients with unreachable papillae. Nevertheless, there have been no direct comparisons between these two approaches. Therefore, we aim to evaluate and compare the safety and efficiency of EUS-HGS and EUS-AG in patients with an unreachable papilla. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre study with two parallel groups without masking. One hundred forty-eight patients from three hospitals who met the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo either EUS-HGS or EUS-AG for relief of malignant biliary obstruction. The final study follow-up is scheduled at 1 year postoperatively. The primary endpoint is efficiency, described by technical and clinical success rates of EUS-HGS and EUS-AG in patients with unreachable papillae. The secondary endpoints include stent patency, overall survival rates, complication rates, length of hospital stays, and hospitalisation expenses. The chi-square test, Kaplan–Meier methods, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis will be used to analyse the data. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare these two EUS-BD approaches directly using a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial design. The clinical economic indexes will also be compared, as they may also affect the patient’s choice. The result may contribute to establishing a strategic guideline for choosing IH EUS-BD approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) ChiCTR1900020737. Registered on 15 January 2019 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7525949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75259492020-09-30 Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and the antegrade technique in the management of unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial Liao, Ye Giovannini, Marc Zhong, Ning Xiao, Tingyue Sheng, Shiyun Wu, Yufan Zhang, Jingjing Wang, Sheng Liu, Xiang Sun, Siyu Guo, Jintao Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is used after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Based on existing studies, intrahepatic (IH) approaches are preferred in patients with dilated IH bile ducts. Both ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) and ultrasound-guided antegrade treatment (EUS-AG) are appropriate for patients with unreachable papillae. Nevertheless, there have been no direct comparisons between these two approaches. Therefore, we aim to evaluate and compare the safety and efficiency of EUS-HGS and EUS-AG in patients with an unreachable papilla. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre study with two parallel groups without masking. One hundred forty-eight patients from three hospitals who met the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo either EUS-HGS or EUS-AG for relief of malignant biliary obstruction. The final study follow-up is scheduled at 1 year postoperatively. The primary endpoint is efficiency, described by technical and clinical success rates of EUS-HGS and EUS-AG in patients with unreachable papillae. The secondary endpoints include stent patency, overall survival rates, complication rates, length of hospital stays, and hospitalisation expenses. The chi-square test, Kaplan–Meier methods, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis will be used to analyse the data. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare these two EUS-BD approaches directly using a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial design. The clinical economic indexes will also be compared, as they may also affect the patient’s choice. The result may contribute to establishing a strategic guideline for choosing IH EUS-BD approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) ChiCTR1900020737. Registered on 15 January 2019 BioMed Central 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7525949/ /pubmed/32993731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04758-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Liao, Ye Giovannini, Marc Zhong, Ning Xiao, Tingyue Sheng, Shiyun Wu, Yufan Zhang, Jingjing Wang, Sheng Liu, Xiang Sun, Siyu Guo, Jintao Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and the antegrade technique in the management of unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial |
title | Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and the antegrade technique in the management of unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and the antegrade technique in the management of unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and the antegrade technique in the management of unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and the antegrade technique in the management of unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and the antegrade technique in the management of unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and the antegrade technique in the management of unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7525949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04758-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liaoye comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandtheantegradetechniqueinthemanagementofunresectablemalignantbiliaryobstructionstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT giovanninimarc comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandtheantegradetechniqueinthemanagementofunresectablemalignantbiliaryobstructionstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT zhongning comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandtheantegradetechniqueinthemanagementofunresectablemalignantbiliaryobstructionstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT xiaotingyue comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandtheantegradetechniqueinthemanagementofunresectablemalignantbiliaryobstructionstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT shengshiyun comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandtheantegradetechniqueinthemanagementofunresectablemalignantbiliaryobstructionstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wuyufan comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandtheantegradetechniqueinthemanagementofunresectablemalignantbiliaryobstructionstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT zhangjingjing comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandtheantegradetechniqueinthemanagementofunresectablemalignantbiliaryobstructionstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wangsheng comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandtheantegradetechniqueinthemanagementofunresectablemalignantbiliaryobstructionstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT liuxiang comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandtheantegradetechniqueinthemanagementofunresectablemalignantbiliaryobstructionstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sunsiyu comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandtheantegradetechniqueinthemanagementofunresectablemalignantbiliaryobstructionstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT guojintao comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyandtheantegradetechniqueinthemanagementofunresectablemalignantbiliaryobstructionstudyprotocolforaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial |