Cargando…

Saliva diagnostic utility in patients with type 2 diabetes: Future standard method

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to assess saliva reliability in diagnosis and monitoring type 2 diabetes instead of blood. METHODS: Blood and unstimulated whole saliva were collected from 300 type 2 diabetic subjects and 300 healthy controls in fasting. Then, the salivary flow rate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mrag, Marwa, Kassab, Asma, Omezzine, Asma, Belkacem, Chebil Raoua, Ben, Fredj Ismail Fatma, Douki, Nabiha, Laouani, Kechrid Chedia, Bouslema, Ali, Ben, Amor Faten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Medical Biochemists of Serbia, Belgrade 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33033445
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jomb-2019-0019
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to assess saliva reliability in diagnosis and monitoring type 2 diabetes instead of blood. METHODS: Blood and unstimulated whole saliva were collected from 300 type 2 diabetic subjects and 300 healthy controls in fasting. Then, the salivary flow rate was calculated. All parameters including glucose, urea, amylase, total protein, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), immunoglobulin A (IgA), potassium, calcium and chloride were assessed in the supernatant, using an autoanalyzer. Oral exam was conducted by a single examiner on full mouth excluding third molars. Statistical analysis was performed by the SPSS 20.0 version. RESULTS: Saliva screening showed that glucose, urea, amylase, total protein, potassium, calcium and chloride were significantly higher in patients compared to controls (p < 0.05). Whereas, the IgA level and salivary flow rate were significantly reduced in patients (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in albumin and CRP levels (p > 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between salivary and plasma glucose levels (r = 0.887, and r = 0.900, p < 0.001), as well as, salivary and blood urea (r = 0.586, and r = 0.688, p < 0.001) in patients and controls, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: From this study, saliva could be suggested as a useful diagnostic tool for type 2 diabetes.