Cargando…

Phone follow-up after inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND: Typically, in-person follow-up in clinic is utilized after outpatient inguinal hernia repair. Studies have shown that phone follow-up may be successfully used for the detection of postoperative hernia recurrences. However, no studies have evaluated the detection rates of other postoperat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Natalie, Greenberg, Jacob A., Xu, Yiwei, Shada, Amber L., Funk, Luke M., Lidor, Anne O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32997270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08005-5
_version_ 1783588800079855616
author Liu, Natalie
Greenberg, Jacob A.
Xu, Yiwei
Shada, Amber L.
Funk, Luke M.
Lidor, Anne O.
author_facet Liu, Natalie
Greenberg, Jacob A.
Xu, Yiwei
Shada, Amber L.
Funk, Luke M.
Lidor, Anne O.
author_sort Liu, Natalie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Typically, in-person follow-up in clinic is utilized after outpatient inguinal hernia repair. Studies have shown that phone follow-up may be successfully used for the detection of postoperative hernia recurrences. However, no studies have evaluated the detection rates of other postoperative complications, such as emergency department visits and readmissions, with the utilization of phone follow-up after inguinal hernia repair. The objective of our study was to investigate the safety of a phone follow-up care pathway following elective, outpatient inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients who underwent elective, outpatient inguinal hernia repair between 2013 and 2019 at a large academic health system in the Midwest United States were identified from the electronic health record. Patients were categorized by type of postoperative follow-up: in-person or phone follow-up. Baseline demographics, operative, and postoperative data were compared between follow-up groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate predictors of having any related emergency department (ED) visit/readmission/reoperation within 90 days. RESULTS: We included 2009 patients who underwent elective inguinal hernia repair during the study period. 321 patients had in-person follow-up only, while 1,688 patients had phone follow-up. There was a higher rate of laparoscopic repair in the phone follow-up group (85.4% vs. 53.0% for in-person follow-up). There were no differences in rates of related 90-day ED visits, readmissions, and reoperations between the phone and in-person follow-up groups. On multivariable logistic regression, receipt of phone follow-up was not a predictor of having 90-day ED visits, readmissions, or reoperations (OR 1.30, 95% CI [0.83, 2.05]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent phone follow-up had similarly low rates of adverse outcomes to those with in-person follow-up. Phone follow-up protocols may be implemented as an alternative for patients and provide a means to decrease healthcare utilization following inguinal hernia repair. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08005-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7526072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75260722020-10-01 Phone follow-up after inguinal hernia repair Liu, Natalie Greenberg, Jacob A. Xu, Yiwei Shada, Amber L. Funk, Luke M. Lidor, Anne O. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Typically, in-person follow-up in clinic is utilized after outpatient inguinal hernia repair. Studies have shown that phone follow-up may be successfully used for the detection of postoperative hernia recurrences. However, no studies have evaluated the detection rates of other postoperative complications, such as emergency department visits and readmissions, with the utilization of phone follow-up after inguinal hernia repair. The objective of our study was to investigate the safety of a phone follow-up care pathway following elective, outpatient inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients who underwent elective, outpatient inguinal hernia repair between 2013 and 2019 at a large academic health system in the Midwest United States were identified from the electronic health record. Patients were categorized by type of postoperative follow-up: in-person or phone follow-up. Baseline demographics, operative, and postoperative data were compared between follow-up groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate predictors of having any related emergency department (ED) visit/readmission/reoperation within 90 days. RESULTS: We included 2009 patients who underwent elective inguinal hernia repair during the study period. 321 patients had in-person follow-up only, while 1,688 patients had phone follow-up. There was a higher rate of laparoscopic repair in the phone follow-up group (85.4% vs. 53.0% for in-person follow-up). There were no differences in rates of related 90-day ED visits, readmissions, and reoperations between the phone and in-person follow-up groups. On multivariable logistic regression, receipt of phone follow-up was not a predictor of having 90-day ED visits, readmissions, or reoperations (OR 1.30, 95% CI [0.83, 2.05]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent phone follow-up had similarly low rates of adverse outcomes to those with in-person follow-up. Phone follow-up protocols may be implemented as an alternative for patients and provide a means to decrease healthcare utilization following inguinal hernia repair. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08005-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-09-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7526072/ /pubmed/32997270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08005-5 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Natalie
Greenberg, Jacob A.
Xu, Yiwei
Shada, Amber L.
Funk, Luke M.
Lidor, Anne O.
Phone follow-up after inguinal hernia repair
title Phone follow-up after inguinal hernia repair
title_full Phone follow-up after inguinal hernia repair
title_fullStr Phone follow-up after inguinal hernia repair
title_full_unstemmed Phone follow-up after inguinal hernia repair
title_short Phone follow-up after inguinal hernia repair
title_sort phone follow-up after inguinal hernia repair
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32997270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08005-5
work_keys_str_mv AT liunatalie phonefollowupafteringuinalherniarepair
AT greenbergjacoba phonefollowupafteringuinalherniarepair
AT xuyiwei phonefollowupafteringuinalherniarepair
AT shadaamberl phonefollowupafteringuinalherniarepair
AT funklukem phonefollowupafteringuinalherniarepair
AT lidoranneo phonefollowupafteringuinalherniarepair