Cargando…

Sevoflurane modulates breast cancer cell survival via modulation of intracellular calcium homeostasis

BACKGROUND: Some retrospective and in vitro studies suggest that general anesthetics influence breast cancer recurrence and metastasis. We compared the effects of general anesthetics sevoflurane versus propofol on breast cancer cell survival, proliferation and invasion in vitro. The investigation fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Xiaoqian, Vipani, Megha, Liang, Ge, Gouda, Divakara, Wang, Beibei, Wei, Huafeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01139-y
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Some retrospective and in vitro studies suggest that general anesthetics influence breast cancer recurrence and metastasis. We compared the effects of general anesthetics sevoflurane versus propofol on breast cancer cell survival, proliferation and invasion in vitro. The investigation focused on effects in intracellular Ca(2+) homeostasis as a mechanism for general anesthetic-mediated effects on breast cancer cell survival and metastasis. METHODS: Estrogen receptor-positive (MCF7) and estrogen receptor-negative (MDA-MB-436) human breast cancer cell lines along with normal breast tissue (MCF10A) were used. Cells were exposed to sevoflurane or propofol at clinically relevant and extreme doses and durations for dose- and time-dependence studies. Cell survival, proliferation and migration following anesthetic exposure were assessed. Intracellular and extracellular Ca(2+) concentrations were modulated using Ca(2+) chelation and a TRPV1 Ca(2+) channel antagonist to examine the role of Ca(2+) in mediating anesthetic effects. RESULTS: Sevoflurane affected breast cancer cell survival in dose-, time- and cell type-dependent manners. Sevoflurane, but not propofol, at equipotent and clinically relevant doses (2% vs. 2 μM) for 6 h significantly promoted breast cell survival in all three types of cells. Paradoxically, extreme exposure to sevoflurane (4%, 24 h) decreased survival in all three cell lines. Chelation of cytosolic Ca(2+) dramatically decreased cell survival in both breast cancer lines but not control cells. Inhibition of TRPV1 receptors significantly reduced cell survival in all cell types, an effect that was partially reversed by equipotent sevoflurane but not propofol. Six-hour exposure to sevoflurane or propofol did not affect cell proliferation, metastasis or TRPV1 protein expression in any type of cell. CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane, but not propofol, at clinically relevant concentrations and durations, increased survival of breast cancer cells in vitro but had no effect on cell proliferation, migration or TRPV1 expression. Breast cancer cells require higher cytoplasmic Ca(2+) levels for survival than normal breast tissue. Sevoflurane affects breast cancer cell survival via modulation of intracellular Ca(2+) homeostasis.