Cargando…
Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study
BACKGROUND: Bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can lead to underestimation or overestimation of the true effects of interventions. Surgical RCTs may suffer from the risk of bias (RoB) that is avoidable in trials of other interventions, and vice versa. We aimed to compare the adequacy of RoB...
Autores principales: | Barcot, Ognjen, Boric, Matija, Dosenovic, Svjetlana, Cavar, Marija, Jelicic Kadic, Antonia, Poklepovic Pericic, Tina, Vukicevic, Ivana, Vuka, Ivana, Puljak, Livia |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01123-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Assessing the risk of performance and detection bias in Cochrane reviews as a joint domain is less accurate compared to two separate domains
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Cochrane plain language summaries are highly heterogeneous with low adherence to the standards
por: Jelicic Kadic, Antonia, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability
por: Babic, Andrija, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The judgement of biases included in the category “other bias” in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey
por: Babic, Andrija, et al.
Publicado: (2019)