Cargando…

Effectiveness of Echium amoenum on premenstrual syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of Echium amoenum (EA) on the severity of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) in comparison with placebo. METHODS: The present study was a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. A checklist questionnaire was completed by 120, 18 to 35-ye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farahmand, Maryam, Khalili, Davood, Ramezani Tehrani, Fahimeh, Amin, Gholamreza, Negarandeh, Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-03084-2
_version_ 1783588814971731968
author Farahmand, Maryam
Khalili, Davood
Ramezani Tehrani, Fahimeh
Amin, Gholamreza
Negarandeh, Reza
author_facet Farahmand, Maryam
Khalili, Davood
Ramezani Tehrani, Fahimeh
Amin, Gholamreza
Negarandeh, Reza
author_sort Farahmand, Maryam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of Echium amoenum (EA) on the severity of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) in comparison with placebo. METHODS: The present study was a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. A checklist questionnaire was completed by 120, 18 to 35-year-old, college students. And then, 84 eligible women (20 to 35 years old) were enrolled in the trial; they were randomly assigned to two groups of intervention (EA) and control (placebo), with 42 participants in each group. Participants in the intervention group received 450 mg capsules of EA per day (three times a day) from the 21st day of their menstrual cycle until the 3rd day of their next cycle for two consecutive cycles. The severity of PMS was measured and ranked using the premenstrual symptoms screening tool (PSST). The generalized estimating equation was used to compare the total score of the severity of PMS between the two groups. RESULTS: Sixty-nine women with regular menstrual cycles suffering from PMS completed the study. The mean scores of the symptoms in the EA group were 35.3 and 16.1 (P ≤ 0.001) at baseline and after 2 months, respectively, while the mean scores of the symptoms in the placebo group were 31.0 and 28.3 (P = 0.09) at baseline and after 2 months, respectively. The evaluation of the first and the second follow-ups in the intervention group showed that, after being adjusted for age and body mass index (P ≤ 0.001), the mean scores of the premenstrual syndrome, using GEE analysis, have decreased to 6.2 and 11.6, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the results, in comparison with the placebo group, EA was found to be more effective in improving the symptoms of PMS, and is highly recommended for treatment of this syndrome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: IRCT2015110822779N3; Registration date: 2015–11–27.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7526142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75261422020-09-30 Effectiveness of Echium amoenum on premenstrual syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial Farahmand, Maryam Khalili, Davood Ramezani Tehrani, Fahimeh Amin, Gholamreza Negarandeh, Reza BMC Complement Med Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of Echium amoenum (EA) on the severity of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) in comparison with placebo. METHODS: The present study was a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. A checklist questionnaire was completed by 120, 18 to 35-year-old, college students. And then, 84 eligible women (20 to 35 years old) were enrolled in the trial; they were randomly assigned to two groups of intervention (EA) and control (placebo), with 42 participants in each group. Participants in the intervention group received 450 mg capsules of EA per day (three times a day) from the 21st day of their menstrual cycle until the 3rd day of their next cycle for two consecutive cycles. The severity of PMS was measured and ranked using the premenstrual symptoms screening tool (PSST). The generalized estimating equation was used to compare the total score of the severity of PMS between the two groups. RESULTS: Sixty-nine women with regular menstrual cycles suffering from PMS completed the study. The mean scores of the symptoms in the EA group were 35.3 and 16.1 (P ≤ 0.001) at baseline and after 2 months, respectively, while the mean scores of the symptoms in the placebo group were 31.0 and 28.3 (P = 0.09) at baseline and after 2 months, respectively. The evaluation of the first and the second follow-ups in the intervention group showed that, after being adjusted for age and body mass index (P ≤ 0.001), the mean scores of the premenstrual syndrome, using GEE analysis, have decreased to 6.2 and 11.6, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the results, in comparison with the placebo group, EA was found to be more effective in improving the symptoms of PMS, and is highly recommended for treatment of this syndrome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: IRCT2015110822779N3; Registration date: 2015–11–27. BioMed Central 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7526142/ /pubmed/32993653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-03084-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Farahmand, Maryam
Khalili, Davood
Ramezani Tehrani, Fahimeh
Amin, Gholamreza
Negarandeh, Reza
Effectiveness of Echium amoenum on premenstrual syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
title Effectiveness of Echium amoenum on premenstrual syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness of Echium amoenum on premenstrual syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Echium amoenum on premenstrual syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Echium amoenum on premenstrual syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness of Echium amoenum on premenstrual syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of echium amoenum on premenstrual syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-03084-2
work_keys_str_mv AT farahmandmaryam effectivenessofechiumamoenumonpremenstrualsyndromearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT khalilidavood effectivenessofechiumamoenumonpremenstrualsyndromearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT ramezanitehranifahimeh effectivenessofechiumamoenumonpremenstrualsyndromearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT amingholamreza effectivenessofechiumamoenumonpremenstrualsyndromearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT negarandehreza effectivenessofechiumamoenumonpremenstrualsyndromearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial