Cargando…

Evaluating an implementation programme for medication review with follow-up in community pharmacy using a hybrid effectiveness study design: translating evidence into practice

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate an implementation programme of a community pharmacy medication review with follow-up (MRF) service using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study design, and to compare the clinical and humanistic outcomes with those in a previously conducted cluster randomised controlled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Varas-Doval, Raquel, Gastelurrutia, Miguel A, Benrimoj, Shalom I, Zarzuelo, Maria Jose, Garcia-Cardenas, Victoria, Perez-Escamilla, Beatriz, Martínez-Martínez, Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32994235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036669
_version_ 1783588844286771200
author Varas-Doval, Raquel
Gastelurrutia, Miguel A
Benrimoj, Shalom I
Zarzuelo, Maria Jose
Garcia-Cardenas, Victoria
Perez-Escamilla, Beatriz
Martínez-Martínez, Fernando
author_facet Varas-Doval, Raquel
Gastelurrutia, Miguel A
Benrimoj, Shalom I
Zarzuelo, Maria Jose
Garcia-Cardenas, Victoria
Perez-Escamilla, Beatriz
Martínez-Martínez, Fernando
author_sort Varas-Doval, Raquel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate an implementation programme of a community pharmacy medication review with follow-up (MRF) service using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study design, and to compare the clinical and humanistic outcomes with those in a previously conducted cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT). SETTING: Community pharmacies in Spain. PARTICIPANTS: 135 community pharmacies and 222 pharmacists providing MRF to polymedicated patients aged 65 or over. INTERVENTION: The intervention was an implementation programme for the MRF service. A national level group was established, mirrored with a provincial level group. A series of interventions were defined (1) to engage pharmacy owners with the implementation model and (2) to provide training to pharmacists consisting of clinical case studies, process of MRF, communication skills and data collection methods and (3) practice change facilitators. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes for the implementation programme were progress, reach, fidelity and integration. The secondary outcomes were number of medications, non-controlled health problems, emergency visits, hospitalisations and health-related quality of life, which were compared with a previous 6-month cluster RCT. RESULTS: 55% of pharmacies reached the implementation phase and 35.6% remained in the testing phase at 12 months. A reach of 89.3% (n=844) was achieved. Fidelity average score was 8.45 (min: 6.2, max: 9.3) out of 10. The integration mean score was 3.39 (SD: 0.72) out of 5. MRF service outcomes were similar to the cluster RCT study; however, the magnitude of the outcomes was delayed. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of pharmacy services is a complex multifactorial process, conditioned by numerous implementation factors. In the absence of remuneration, the implementation of the MRF service is a slow process, taking at least 12 months to complete. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CGFTRA-2017-01.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7526286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75262862020-10-19 Evaluating an implementation programme for medication review with follow-up in community pharmacy using a hybrid effectiveness study design: translating evidence into practice Varas-Doval, Raquel Gastelurrutia, Miguel A Benrimoj, Shalom I Zarzuelo, Maria Jose Garcia-Cardenas, Victoria Perez-Escamilla, Beatriz Martínez-Martínez, Fernando BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To evaluate an implementation programme of a community pharmacy medication review with follow-up (MRF) service using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study design, and to compare the clinical and humanistic outcomes with those in a previously conducted cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT). SETTING: Community pharmacies in Spain. PARTICIPANTS: 135 community pharmacies and 222 pharmacists providing MRF to polymedicated patients aged 65 or over. INTERVENTION: The intervention was an implementation programme for the MRF service. A national level group was established, mirrored with a provincial level group. A series of interventions were defined (1) to engage pharmacy owners with the implementation model and (2) to provide training to pharmacists consisting of clinical case studies, process of MRF, communication skills and data collection methods and (3) practice change facilitators. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes for the implementation programme were progress, reach, fidelity and integration. The secondary outcomes were number of medications, non-controlled health problems, emergency visits, hospitalisations and health-related quality of life, which were compared with a previous 6-month cluster RCT. RESULTS: 55% of pharmacies reached the implementation phase and 35.6% remained in the testing phase at 12 months. A reach of 89.3% (n=844) was achieved. Fidelity average score was 8.45 (min: 6.2, max: 9.3) out of 10. The integration mean score was 3.39 (SD: 0.72) out of 5. MRF service outcomes were similar to the cluster RCT study; however, the magnitude of the outcomes was delayed. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of pharmacy services is a complex multifactorial process, conditioned by numerous implementation factors. In the absence of remuneration, the implementation of the MRF service is a slow process, taking at least 12 months to complete. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CGFTRA-2017-01. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7526286/ /pubmed/32994235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036669 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Varas-Doval, Raquel
Gastelurrutia, Miguel A
Benrimoj, Shalom I
Zarzuelo, Maria Jose
Garcia-Cardenas, Victoria
Perez-Escamilla, Beatriz
Martínez-Martínez, Fernando
Evaluating an implementation programme for medication review with follow-up in community pharmacy using a hybrid effectiveness study design: translating evidence into practice
title Evaluating an implementation programme for medication review with follow-up in community pharmacy using a hybrid effectiveness study design: translating evidence into practice
title_full Evaluating an implementation programme for medication review with follow-up in community pharmacy using a hybrid effectiveness study design: translating evidence into practice
title_fullStr Evaluating an implementation programme for medication review with follow-up in community pharmacy using a hybrid effectiveness study design: translating evidence into practice
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating an implementation programme for medication review with follow-up in community pharmacy using a hybrid effectiveness study design: translating evidence into practice
title_short Evaluating an implementation programme for medication review with follow-up in community pharmacy using a hybrid effectiveness study design: translating evidence into practice
title_sort evaluating an implementation programme for medication review with follow-up in community pharmacy using a hybrid effectiveness study design: translating evidence into practice
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32994235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036669
work_keys_str_mv AT varasdovalraquel evaluatinganimplementationprogrammeformedicationreviewwithfollowupincommunitypharmacyusingahybrideffectivenessstudydesigntranslatingevidenceintopractice
AT gastelurrutiamiguela evaluatinganimplementationprogrammeformedicationreviewwithfollowupincommunitypharmacyusingahybrideffectivenessstudydesigntranslatingevidenceintopractice
AT benrimojshalomi evaluatinganimplementationprogrammeformedicationreviewwithfollowupincommunitypharmacyusingahybrideffectivenessstudydesigntranslatingevidenceintopractice
AT zarzuelomariajose evaluatinganimplementationprogrammeformedicationreviewwithfollowupincommunitypharmacyusingahybrideffectivenessstudydesigntranslatingevidenceintopractice
AT garciacardenasvictoria evaluatinganimplementationprogrammeformedicationreviewwithfollowupincommunitypharmacyusingahybrideffectivenessstudydesigntranslatingevidenceintopractice
AT perezescamillabeatriz evaluatinganimplementationprogrammeformedicationreviewwithfollowupincommunitypharmacyusingahybrideffectivenessstudydesigntranslatingevidenceintopractice
AT martinezmartinezfernando evaluatinganimplementationprogrammeformedicationreviewwithfollowupincommunitypharmacyusingahybrideffectivenessstudydesigntranslatingevidenceintopractice