Cargando…
Efficacy and Toxicity of Adjuvant Therapies for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer in Stage I–III: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: The use of adjuvant therapy for high-risk endometrial cancer patients (HREC) in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I–III remains debatable. This network meta-analysis was conducted to compare and rank adjuvant therapies based on efficacies and toxicities t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32950998 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.925595 |
_version_ | 1783588854445375488 |
---|---|
author | Ao, Mengyin Ding, Ting Tang, Dan Xi, Mingrong |
author_facet | Ao, Mengyin Ding, Ting Tang, Dan Xi, Mingrong |
author_sort | Ao, Mengyin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of adjuvant therapy for high-risk endometrial cancer patients (HREC) in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I–III remains debatable. This network meta-analysis was conducted to compare and rank adjuvant therapies based on efficacies and toxicities to facilitate clinical decision-making and further research. MATERIAL/METHODS: We searched 3 databases – PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials – from inception to December 9, 2019. Only randomized controlled trials that compared any of these adjuvant therapies (pelvic radiotherapy, vaginal brachytherapy, chemotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy) with each other or surgery alone were included. The network meta-analysis was performed in a frequentist framework using Stata software 15.0. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs with 5872 participants were eligible. No significant difference between treatments was observed in 5-year overall survival (OS) or distant metastasis. Compared with surgery alone, adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (pelvic RT-CT) prolonged 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and pelvic radiotherapy (pelvic RT) (RR=0.61, 95% CI 0.39–0.96; RR=0.779, 95% CI 0.63–0.95). Compared with surgery alone, pelvic RT, the combination of pelvic RT and vaginal brachytherapy (pelvic RT-VBT), chemotherapy (CT), and pelvic RT-CT led to fewer local recurrences (RR=0.33, 95% CI 0.21–0.50; RR=0.15, 95% CI 0.03–0.74; RR=0.39, 95% CI 0.21–0.73; RR=0.17, 95% CI 0.06–0.46). Adjuvant CT was found to result in more grade III/IV late toxicities than surgery alone (RR=11.8, 95% CI 1.02–137.14). Pelvic RT-CT ranked first for OS, PFS, distant metastasis, and local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic RT-CT is superior to other treatments for PFS and local recurrence rate, and associated related toxicities are tolerable, suggesting it may be an ideal adjuvant therapy for HREC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7526341 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75263412020-10-16 Efficacy and Toxicity of Adjuvant Therapies for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer in Stage I–III: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Ao, Mengyin Ding, Ting Tang, Dan Xi, Mingrong Med Sci Monit Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: The use of adjuvant therapy for high-risk endometrial cancer patients (HREC) in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I–III remains debatable. This network meta-analysis was conducted to compare and rank adjuvant therapies based on efficacies and toxicities to facilitate clinical decision-making and further research. MATERIAL/METHODS: We searched 3 databases – PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials – from inception to December 9, 2019. Only randomized controlled trials that compared any of these adjuvant therapies (pelvic radiotherapy, vaginal brachytherapy, chemotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy) with each other or surgery alone were included. The network meta-analysis was performed in a frequentist framework using Stata software 15.0. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs with 5872 participants were eligible. No significant difference between treatments was observed in 5-year overall survival (OS) or distant metastasis. Compared with surgery alone, adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (pelvic RT-CT) prolonged 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and pelvic radiotherapy (pelvic RT) (RR=0.61, 95% CI 0.39–0.96; RR=0.779, 95% CI 0.63–0.95). Compared with surgery alone, pelvic RT, the combination of pelvic RT and vaginal brachytherapy (pelvic RT-VBT), chemotherapy (CT), and pelvic RT-CT led to fewer local recurrences (RR=0.33, 95% CI 0.21–0.50; RR=0.15, 95% CI 0.03–0.74; RR=0.39, 95% CI 0.21–0.73; RR=0.17, 95% CI 0.06–0.46). Adjuvant CT was found to result in more grade III/IV late toxicities than surgery alone (RR=11.8, 95% CI 1.02–137.14). Pelvic RT-CT ranked first for OS, PFS, distant metastasis, and local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic RT-CT is superior to other treatments for PFS and local recurrence rate, and associated related toxicities are tolerable, suggesting it may be an ideal adjuvant therapy for HREC patients. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2020-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7526341/ /pubmed/32950998 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.925595 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2020 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Ao, Mengyin Ding, Ting Tang, Dan Xi, Mingrong Efficacy and Toxicity of Adjuvant Therapies for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer in Stage I–III: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title | Efficacy and Toxicity of Adjuvant Therapies for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer in Stage I–III: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and Toxicity of Adjuvant Therapies for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer in Stage I–III: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Toxicity of Adjuvant Therapies for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer in Stage I–III: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Toxicity of Adjuvant Therapies for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer in Stage I–III: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and Toxicity of Adjuvant Therapies for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer in Stage I–III: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant therapies for high-risk endometrial cancer in stage i–iii: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32950998 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.925595 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aomengyin efficacyandtoxicityofadjuvanttherapiesforhighriskendometrialcancerinstageiiiiasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT dingting efficacyandtoxicityofadjuvanttherapiesforhighriskendometrialcancerinstageiiiiasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT tangdan efficacyandtoxicityofadjuvanttherapiesforhighriskendometrialcancerinstageiiiiasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT ximingrong efficacyandtoxicityofadjuvanttherapiesforhighriskendometrialcancerinstageiiiiasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |