Cargando…
Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients?
BACKGROUND: While single embryo transfer (SET) is widely advocated, double embryo transfer (DET) remains preferable in clinical practice to improve IVF success rate, especially in poor prognosis patients with only poor quality embryos (PQEs) available in addition to one or no good quality embryos (G...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32998748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00656-2 |
_version_ | 1783588865032847360 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Wenjie Cai, Jiali Liu, Lanlan Xu, Yingpei Liu, Zhenfang Chen, Jinghua Jiang, Xiaoming Sun, Xiaohua Ren, Jianzhi |
author_facet | Wang, Wenjie Cai, Jiali Liu, Lanlan Xu, Yingpei Liu, Zhenfang Chen, Jinghua Jiang, Xiaoming Sun, Xiaohua Ren, Jianzhi |
author_sort | Wang, Wenjie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While single embryo transfer (SET) is widely advocated, double embryo transfer (DET) remains preferable in clinical practice to improve IVF success rate, especially in poor prognosis patients with only poor quality embryos (PQEs) available in addition to one or no good quality embryos (GQEs). Furthermore, previous studies suggest PQE might adversely affect the implantation of a GQE when transferred together. This study aims to evaluate the effect of transferring an additional PQE with a GQE on the outcomes in poor prognosis patients. METHODS: A total of 5037 frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT) cycles between January 2012 and May 2019 were included. Propensity score matching was applied to control for potential confounders, and we used generalized estimating equations (GEE) models to identify the association between the effect of an additional PQE and the outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, transferring a PQE with GQE (Group GP) achieved significantly higher pregnancy rate (PR), live birth rate (LBR) and multiple pregnancy rate (MPR) than GQE only (group G). The addition of a PQE increased LBR in patients aged 35 and over and in patients who received over 3 cycles of embryo transfer (ET) (48.1% vs 27.2%, OR:2.56, 95% CI: 1.3–5.03 and 46.6% vs 35.4%, OR:1.6, 95% CI: 1.09–2.35), but not in women under 35 and in women who received less than 3 cycles of ET (48.7% vs 43.9%, OR:1.22, 95% CI: 0.93–1.59 and 48.3% vs 41.4%, OR:1.33, 95% CI: 0.96–1.85). Group GP resulted in significantly higher MPR than group G irrespective of age and the number of previous IVF cycles. CONCLUSIONS: An additional PQE does not negatively affect the implantation potential of the co-transferred GQE. Nevertheless, the addition of a PQE contributes to both live birth and multiple birth in poor prognosis patients. Physicians should still balance the benefits and risks of DET. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7526391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75263912020-10-01 Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients? Wang, Wenjie Cai, Jiali Liu, Lanlan Xu, Yingpei Liu, Zhenfang Chen, Jinghua Jiang, Xiaoming Sun, Xiaohua Ren, Jianzhi Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: While single embryo transfer (SET) is widely advocated, double embryo transfer (DET) remains preferable in clinical practice to improve IVF success rate, especially in poor prognosis patients with only poor quality embryos (PQEs) available in addition to one or no good quality embryos (GQEs). Furthermore, previous studies suggest PQE might adversely affect the implantation of a GQE when transferred together. This study aims to evaluate the effect of transferring an additional PQE with a GQE on the outcomes in poor prognosis patients. METHODS: A total of 5037 frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT) cycles between January 2012 and May 2019 were included. Propensity score matching was applied to control for potential confounders, and we used generalized estimating equations (GEE) models to identify the association between the effect of an additional PQE and the outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, transferring a PQE with GQE (Group GP) achieved significantly higher pregnancy rate (PR), live birth rate (LBR) and multiple pregnancy rate (MPR) than GQE only (group G). The addition of a PQE increased LBR in patients aged 35 and over and in patients who received over 3 cycles of embryo transfer (ET) (48.1% vs 27.2%, OR:2.56, 95% CI: 1.3–5.03 and 46.6% vs 35.4%, OR:1.6, 95% CI: 1.09–2.35), but not in women under 35 and in women who received less than 3 cycles of ET (48.7% vs 43.9%, OR:1.22, 95% CI: 0.93–1.59 and 48.3% vs 41.4%, OR:1.33, 95% CI: 0.96–1.85). Group GP resulted in significantly higher MPR than group G irrespective of age and the number of previous IVF cycles. CONCLUSIONS: An additional PQE does not negatively affect the implantation potential of the co-transferred GQE. Nevertheless, the addition of a PQE contributes to both live birth and multiple birth in poor prognosis patients. Physicians should still balance the benefits and risks of DET. BioMed Central 2020-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7526391/ /pubmed/32998748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00656-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wang, Wenjie Cai, Jiali Liu, Lanlan Xu, Yingpei Liu, Zhenfang Chen, Jinghua Jiang, Xiaoming Sun, Xiaohua Ren, Jianzhi Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients? |
title | Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients? |
title_full | Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients? |
title_fullStr | Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients? |
title_short | Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients? |
title_sort | does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32998748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00656-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangwenjie doesthetransferofapoorqualityembryowithagoodqualityembryobenefitpoorprognosispatients AT caijiali doesthetransferofapoorqualityembryowithagoodqualityembryobenefitpoorprognosispatients AT liulanlan doesthetransferofapoorqualityembryowithagoodqualityembryobenefitpoorprognosispatients AT xuyingpei doesthetransferofapoorqualityembryowithagoodqualityembryobenefitpoorprognosispatients AT liuzhenfang doesthetransferofapoorqualityembryowithagoodqualityembryobenefitpoorprognosispatients AT chenjinghua doesthetransferofapoorqualityembryowithagoodqualityembryobenefitpoorprognosispatients AT jiangxiaoming doesthetransferofapoorqualityembryowithagoodqualityembryobenefitpoorprognosispatients AT sunxiaohua doesthetransferofapoorqualityembryowithagoodqualityembryobenefitpoorprognosispatients AT renjianzhi doesthetransferofapoorqualityembryowithagoodqualityembryobenefitpoorprognosispatients |