Cargando…
Credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare: ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective
The complexities of modern biomedicine are rapidly increasing. Thus, modeling and simulation have become increasingly important as a strategy to understand and predict the trajectory of pathophysiology, disease genesis, and disease spread in support of clinical and policy decisions. In such cases, i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02540-4 |
_version_ | 1783588869768216576 |
---|---|
author | Erdemir, Ahmet Mulugeta, Lealem Ku, Joy P. Drach, Andrew Horner, Marc Morrison, Tina M. Peng, Grace C. Y. Vadigepalli, Rajanikanth Lytton, William W. Myers, Jerry G. |
author_facet | Erdemir, Ahmet Mulugeta, Lealem Ku, Joy P. Drach, Andrew Horner, Marc Morrison, Tina M. Peng, Grace C. Y. Vadigepalli, Rajanikanth Lytton, William W. Myers, Jerry G. |
author_sort | Erdemir, Ahmet |
collection | PubMed |
description | The complexities of modern biomedicine are rapidly increasing. Thus, modeling and simulation have become increasingly important as a strategy to understand and predict the trajectory of pathophysiology, disease genesis, and disease spread in support of clinical and policy decisions. In such cases, inappropriate or ill-placed trust in the model and simulation outcomes may result in negative outcomes, and hence illustrate the need to formalize the execution and communication of modeling and simulation practices. Although verification and validation have been generally accepted as significant components of a model’s credibility, they cannot be assumed to equate to a holistic credible practice, which includes activities that can impact comprehension and in-depth examination inherent in the development and reuse of the models. For the past several years, the Committee on Credible Practice of Modeling and Simulation in Healthcare, an interdisciplinary group seeded from a U.S. interagency initiative, has worked to codify best practices. Here, we provide Ten Rules for credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare developed from a comparative analysis by the Committee’s multidisciplinary membership, followed by a large stakeholder community survey. These rules establish a unified conceptual framework for modeling and simulation design, implementation, evaluation, dissemination and usage across the modeling and simulation life-cycle. While biomedical science and clinical care domains have somewhat different requirements and expectations for credible practice, our study converged on rules that would be useful across a broad swath of model types. In brief, the rules are: (1) Define context clearly. (2) Use contextually appropriate data. (3) Evaluate within context. (4) List limitations explicitly. (5) Use version control. (6) Document appropriately. (7) Disseminate broadly. (8) Get independent reviews. (9) Test competing implementations. (10) Conform to standards. Although some of these are common sense guidelines, we have found that many are often missed or misconstrued, even by seasoned practitioners. Computational models are already widely used in basic science to generate new biomedical knowledge. As they penetrate clinical care and healthcare policy, contributing to personalized and precision medicine, clinical safety will require established guidelines for the credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7526418 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75264182020-10-01 Credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare: ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective Erdemir, Ahmet Mulugeta, Lealem Ku, Joy P. Drach, Andrew Horner, Marc Morrison, Tina M. Peng, Grace C. Y. Vadigepalli, Rajanikanth Lytton, William W. Myers, Jerry G. J Transl Med Review The complexities of modern biomedicine are rapidly increasing. Thus, modeling and simulation have become increasingly important as a strategy to understand and predict the trajectory of pathophysiology, disease genesis, and disease spread in support of clinical and policy decisions. In such cases, inappropriate or ill-placed trust in the model and simulation outcomes may result in negative outcomes, and hence illustrate the need to formalize the execution and communication of modeling and simulation practices. Although verification and validation have been generally accepted as significant components of a model’s credibility, they cannot be assumed to equate to a holistic credible practice, which includes activities that can impact comprehension and in-depth examination inherent in the development and reuse of the models. For the past several years, the Committee on Credible Practice of Modeling and Simulation in Healthcare, an interdisciplinary group seeded from a U.S. interagency initiative, has worked to codify best practices. Here, we provide Ten Rules for credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare developed from a comparative analysis by the Committee’s multidisciplinary membership, followed by a large stakeholder community survey. These rules establish a unified conceptual framework for modeling and simulation design, implementation, evaluation, dissemination and usage across the modeling and simulation life-cycle. While biomedical science and clinical care domains have somewhat different requirements and expectations for credible practice, our study converged on rules that would be useful across a broad swath of model types. In brief, the rules are: (1) Define context clearly. (2) Use contextually appropriate data. (3) Evaluate within context. (4) List limitations explicitly. (5) Use version control. (6) Document appropriately. (7) Disseminate broadly. (8) Get independent reviews. (9) Test competing implementations. (10) Conform to standards. Although some of these are common sense guidelines, we have found that many are often missed or misconstrued, even by seasoned practitioners. Computational models are already widely used in basic science to generate new biomedical knowledge. As they penetrate clinical care and healthcare policy, contributing to personalized and precision medicine, clinical safety will require established guidelines for the credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare. BioMed Central 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7526418/ /pubmed/32993675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02540-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Erdemir, Ahmet Mulugeta, Lealem Ku, Joy P. Drach, Andrew Horner, Marc Morrison, Tina M. Peng, Grace C. Y. Vadigepalli, Rajanikanth Lytton, William W. Myers, Jerry G. Credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare: ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective |
title | Credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare: ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective |
title_full | Credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare: ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective |
title_fullStr | Credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare: ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare: ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective |
title_short | Credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare: ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective |
title_sort | credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare: ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02540-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erdemirahmet crediblepracticeofmodelingandsimulationinhealthcaretenrulesfromamultidisciplinaryperspective AT mulugetalealem crediblepracticeofmodelingandsimulationinhealthcaretenrulesfromamultidisciplinaryperspective AT kujoyp crediblepracticeofmodelingandsimulationinhealthcaretenrulesfromamultidisciplinaryperspective AT drachandrew crediblepracticeofmodelingandsimulationinhealthcaretenrulesfromamultidisciplinaryperspective AT hornermarc crediblepracticeofmodelingandsimulationinhealthcaretenrulesfromamultidisciplinaryperspective AT morrisontinam crediblepracticeofmodelingandsimulationinhealthcaretenrulesfromamultidisciplinaryperspective AT penggracecy crediblepracticeofmodelingandsimulationinhealthcaretenrulesfromamultidisciplinaryperspective AT vadigepallirajanikanth crediblepracticeofmodelingandsimulationinhealthcaretenrulesfromamultidisciplinaryperspective AT lyttonwilliamw crediblepracticeofmodelingandsimulationinhealthcaretenrulesfromamultidisciplinaryperspective AT myersjerryg crediblepracticeofmodelingandsimulationinhealthcaretenrulesfromamultidisciplinaryperspective |