Cargando…

Impact of mutations in homologous recombination repair genes on treatment outcomes for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION: A significant proportion of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harbor mutations in homologous recombination (HR) repair genes, with some of these mutations associating with increased tumor susceptibility to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlson, Alexander S., Acevedo, Rigo I., Lim, Daniel M., Gulati, Roman, Gawne, Agnes, Sokolova, Alexandra O., Cheng, Heather H., Nelson, Peter S., Montgomery, R. Bruce, Yu, Evan Y., Schweizer, Michael T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32997692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239686
_version_ 1783588938183606272
author Carlson, Alexander S.
Acevedo, Rigo I.
Lim, Daniel M.
Gulati, Roman
Gawne, Agnes
Sokolova, Alexandra O.
Cheng, Heather H.
Nelson, Peter S.
Montgomery, R. Bruce
Yu, Evan Y.
Schweizer, Michael T.
author_facet Carlson, Alexander S.
Acevedo, Rigo I.
Lim, Daniel M.
Gulati, Roman
Gawne, Agnes
Sokolova, Alexandra O.
Cheng, Heather H.
Nelson, Peter S.
Montgomery, R. Bruce
Yu, Evan Y.
Schweizer, Michael T.
author_sort Carlson, Alexander S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A significant proportion of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harbor mutations in homologous recombination (HR) repair genes, with some of these mutations associating with increased tumor susceptibility to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy. While mutations in some HR repair genes (e.g., BRCA1/2) have been associated with a more aggressive clinical course, prior studies correlating HR mutational status with treatment response to androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) or taxane-based chemotherapy have yielded conflicting results. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis to assess clinical outcomes to conventional, regulatory-approved therapies in mCRPC patients with somatic (monoallelic and biallelic) and/or germline HR repair mutations compared to patients without alterations as determined by clinical-grade next-generation sequencing assays. The primary endpoint was PSA30/PSA50 response, defined as ≥30%/≥50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction from baseline. Secondary endpoints of PSA progression-free survival (pPFS) and clinical/radiographic progression-free survival (crPFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: A total of 90 consecutively selected patients were included in this analysis, of which 33 (37%) were identified to have HR repair gene mutations. Age, race, Gleason score, prior surgery, and receipt of prior radiation therapy were comparable between carriers and non-carriers. There was no evidence that PSA30/PSA50 differed by HR gene mutational status. Median pPFS and crPFS ranged 3–14 months across treatment modalities, but there was no evidence either differed by HR gene mutational status (all p>0.05). There was also no difference in outcomes between those with BRCA2 or PALB2 mutations (n = 17) compared to those without HR repair mutations. CONCLUSION: HR gene mutational status was associated with comparable clinical outcomes following treatment with ARSIs or taxane-based chemotherapy. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7526881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75268812020-10-06 Impact of mutations in homologous recombination repair genes on treatment outcomes for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer Carlson, Alexander S. Acevedo, Rigo I. Lim, Daniel M. Gulati, Roman Gawne, Agnes Sokolova, Alexandra O. Cheng, Heather H. Nelson, Peter S. Montgomery, R. Bruce Yu, Evan Y. Schweizer, Michael T. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: A significant proportion of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harbor mutations in homologous recombination (HR) repair genes, with some of these mutations associating with increased tumor susceptibility to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy. While mutations in some HR repair genes (e.g., BRCA1/2) have been associated with a more aggressive clinical course, prior studies correlating HR mutational status with treatment response to androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) or taxane-based chemotherapy have yielded conflicting results. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis to assess clinical outcomes to conventional, regulatory-approved therapies in mCRPC patients with somatic (monoallelic and biallelic) and/or germline HR repair mutations compared to patients without alterations as determined by clinical-grade next-generation sequencing assays. The primary endpoint was PSA30/PSA50 response, defined as ≥30%/≥50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction from baseline. Secondary endpoints of PSA progression-free survival (pPFS) and clinical/radiographic progression-free survival (crPFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: A total of 90 consecutively selected patients were included in this analysis, of which 33 (37%) were identified to have HR repair gene mutations. Age, race, Gleason score, prior surgery, and receipt of prior radiation therapy were comparable between carriers and non-carriers. There was no evidence that PSA30/PSA50 differed by HR gene mutational status. Median pPFS and crPFS ranged 3–14 months across treatment modalities, but there was no evidence either differed by HR gene mutational status (all p>0.05). There was also no difference in outcomes between those with BRCA2 or PALB2 mutations (n = 17) compared to those without HR repair mutations. CONCLUSION: HR gene mutational status was associated with comparable clinical outcomes following treatment with ARSIs or taxane-based chemotherapy. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. Public Library of Science 2020-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7526881/ /pubmed/32997692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239686 Text en © 2020 Carlson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Carlson, Alexander S.
Acevedo, Rigo I.
Lim, Daniel M.
Gulati, Roman
Gawne, Agnes
Sokolova, Alexandra O.
Cheng, Heather H.
Nelson, Peter S.
Montgomery, R. Bruce
Yu, Evan Y.
Schweizer, Michael T.
Impact of mutations in homologous recombination repair genes on treatment outcomes for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer
title Impact of mutations in homologous recombination repair genes on treatment outcomes for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer
title_full Impact of mutations in homologous recombination repair genes on treatment outcomes for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer
title_fullStr Impact of mutations in homologous recombination repair genes on treatment outcomes for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Impact of mutations in homologous recombination repair genes on treatment outcomes for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer
title_short Impact of mutations in homologous recombination repair genes on treatment outcomes for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer
title_sort impact of mutations in homologous recombination repair genes on treatment outcomes for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32997692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239686
work_keys_str_mv AT carlsonalexanders impactofmutationsinhomologousrecombinationrepairgenesontreatmentoutcomesformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT acevedorigoi impactofmutationsinhomologousrecombinationrepairgenesontreatmentoutcomesformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT limdanielm impactofmutationsinhomologousrecombinationrepairgenesontreatmentoutcomesformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT gulatiroman impactofmutationsinhomologousrecombinationrepairgenesontreatmentoutcomesformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT gawneagnes impactofmutationsinhomologousrecombinationrepairgenesontreatmentoutcomesformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT sokolovaalexandrao impactofmutationsinhomologousrecombinationrepairgenesontreatmentoutcomesformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT chengheatherh impactofmutationsinhomologousrecombinationrepairgenesontreatmentoutcomesformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT nelsonpeters impactofmutationsinhomologousrecombinationrepairgenesontreatmentoutcomesformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT montgomeryrbruce impactofmutationsinhomologousrecombinationrepairgenesontreatmentoutcomesformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT yuevany impactofmutationsinhomologousrecombinationrepairgenesontreatmentoutcomesformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT schweizermichaelt impactofmutationsinhomologousrecombinationrepairgenesontreatmentoutcomesformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer