Cargando…
Editorial Comment: Flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy with regional anesthesia vs general anesthesia: A prospective randomized study
Autor principal: | Denstedt, John |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7527084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0770.1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy with regional anesthesia vs general anesthesia: A prospective randomized study
por: Sahan, Murat, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy in children
por: Yeow, When-Chan, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Editorial Comment: Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones ≤ 2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial
por: Danilovic, Alexandre
Publicado: (2022) -
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower-pole stones
por: Knoll, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Editorial Comment from Dr Anan to subcapsular renal hematoma after ureterorenoscopy
por: Anan, Go
Publicado: (2022)