Cargando…
Application of two different nasal CPAP levels for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants—“The OPTTIMMAL-Trial”—Optimizing PEEP To The IMMAture Lungs: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) applies positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and has been shown to reduce the need for intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation in very low birth weight infants with respiratory distress syndrome. However, CPAP failure rates of 50...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7527266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32998769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04660-0 |
_version_ | 1783589019908571136 |
---|---|
author | Waitz, Markus Engel, Corinna Schloesser, Rolf Rochwalsky, Ulrich Meyer, Sascha Zemlin, Michael Bohnhorst, Bettina Peter, Corinna Hoppenz, Marc Pabst, Thomas Zimmer, Klaus-Peter Franz, Axel R. Ehrhardt, Harald Schmidt, Annesuse Larsen, Alexander Hoffmann, Paul Haertel, Christoph Frieauff, Eric Sandkötter, Julia Masjosthusmann, Katja Deindl, Philipp Singer, Dominique |
author_facet | Waitz, Markus Engel, Corinna Schloesser, Rolf Rochwalsky, Ulrich Meyer, Sascha Zemlin, Michael Bohnhorst, Bettina Peter, Corinna Hoppenz, Marc Pabst, Thomas Zimmer, Klaus-Peter Franz, Axel R. Ehrhardt, Harald Schmidt, Annesuse Larsen, Alexander Hoffmann, Paul Haertel, Christoph Frieauff, Eric Sandkötter, Julia Masjosthusmann, Katja Deindl, Philipp Singer, Dominique |
author_sort | Waitz, Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) applies positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and has been shown to reduce the need for intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation in very low birth weight infants with respiratory distress syndrome. However, CPAP failure rates of 50% are reported in large randomized controlled trials. A possible explanation for these failure rates is the application of insufficient low levels of PEEP during nasal CPAP treatment to maintain adequate functional residual capacity shortly after birth. The optimum PEEP level to treat symptoms of respiratory distress in very low birth weight infants has not been assessed in clinical studies. The aim of the study is to compare two different PEEP levels during nasal CPAP treatment in preterm infants. METHODS: In this randomized multicenter trial, 216 preterm infants born at 26 + 0–29 + 6 gestational weeks will be allocated to receive a higher (6–8 cmH(2)O) or a lower (3–5 cmH(2)O) PEEP during neonatal resuscitation and the first 120 h of life. The PEEP level within each group will be titrated throughout the intervention based on the FiO(2) (fraction of inspired oxygen concentration) requirements to keep oxygenation within the target range. The primary outcome is defined as the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation for > 1 h or being not ventilated but reaching one of the two pre-defined CPAP failure criteria (FiO(2) > 0.5 for > 1 h or pCO(2) ≥ 70 mmHg in two consecutive blood gas analyses at least 2 h apart). DISCUSSION: Based on available data from the literature, the optimum level of PEEP that most effectively treats respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants is unknown, since the majority of large clinical trials applied a wide range of PEEP levels (4–8 cmH(2)O). The rationale for our study hypothesis is that the early application of a higher PEEP level will more effectively counteract the collapsing properties of the immature and surfactant-deficient lungs and that the level of inspired oxygen may serve as a surrogate marker to guide PEEP titration. Finding the optimum noninvasive continuous distending pressure during early nasal CPAP is required to improve CPAP efficacy and as a consequence to reduce the exposure to ventilator-induced lung injury and the incidence of chronic lung disease in this vulnerable population of very preterm infants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: drks.de DRKS00019940. Registered on March 13, 2020 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7527266 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75272662020-10-01 Application of two different nasal CPAP levels for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants—“The OPTTIMMAL-Trial”—Optimizing PEEP To The IMMAture Lungs: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial Waitz, Markus Engel, Corinna Schloesser, Rolf Rochwalsky, Ulrich Meyer, Sascha Zemlin, Michael Bohnhorst, Bettina Peter, Corinna Hoppenz, Marc Pabst, Thomas Zimmer, Klaus-Peter Franz, Axel R. Ehrhardt, Harald Schmidt, Annesuse Larsen, Alexander Hoffmann, Paul Haertel, Christoph Frieauff, Eric Sandkötter, Julia Masjosthusmann, Katja Deindl, Philipp Singer, Dominique Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) applies positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and has been shown to reduce the need for intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation in very low birth weight infants with respiratory distress syndrome. However, CPAP failure rates of 50% are reported in large randomized controlled trials. A possible explanation for these failure rates is the application of insufficient low levels of PEEP during nasal CPAP treatment to maintain adequate functional residual capacity shortly after birth. The optimum PEEP level to treat symptoms of respiratory distress in very low birth weight infants has not been assessed in clinical studies. The aim of the study is to compare two different PEEP levels during nasal CPAP treatment in preterm infants. METHODS: In this randomized multicenter trial, 216 preterm infants born at 26 + 0–29 + 6 gestational weeks will be allocated to receive a higher (6–8 cmH(2)O) or a lower (3–5 cmH(2)O) PEEP during neonatal resuscitation and the first 120 h of life. The PEEP level within each group will be titrated throughout the intervention based on the FiO(2) (fraction of inspired oxygen concentration) requirements to keep oxygenation within the target range. The primary outcome is defined as the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation for > 1 h or being not ventilated but reaching one of the two pre-defined CPAP failure criteria (FiO(2) > 0.5 for > 1 h or pCO(2) ≥ 70 mmHg in two consecutive blood gas analyses at least 2 h apart). DISCUSSION: Based on available data from the literature, the optimum level of PEEP that most effectively treats respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants is unknown, since the majority of large clinical trials applied a wide range of PEEP levels (4–8 cmH(2)O). The rationale for our study hypothesis is that the early application of a higher PEEP level will more effectively counteract the collapsing properties of the immature and surfactant-deficient lungs and that the level of inspired oxygen may serve as a surrogate marker to guide PEEP titration. Finding the optimum noninvasive continuous distending pressure during early nasal CPAP is required to improve CPAP efficacy and as a consequence to reduce the exposure to ventilator-induced lung injury and the incidence of chronic lung disease in this vulnerable population of very preterm infants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: drks.de DRKS00019940. Registered on March 13, 2020 BioMed Central 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7527266/ /pubmed/32998769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04660-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Waitz, Markus Engel, Corinna Schloesser, Rolf Rochwalsky, Ulrich Meyer, Sascha Zemlin, Michael Bohnhorst, Bettina Peter, Corinna Hoppenz, Marc Pabst, Thomas Zimmer, Klaus-Peter Franz, Axel R. Ehrhardt, Harald Schmidt, Annesuse Larsen, Alexander Hoffmann, Paul Haertel, Christoph Frieauff, Eric Sandkötter, Julia Masjosthusmann, Katja Deindl, Philipp Singer, Dominique Application of two different nasal CPAP levels for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants—“The OPTTIMMAL-Trial”—Optimizing PEEP To The IMMAture Lungs: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
title | Application of two different nasal CPAP levels for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants—“The OPTTIMMAL-Trial”—Optimizing PEEP To The IMMAture Lungs: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Application of two different nasal CPAP levels for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants—“The OPTTIMMAL-Trial”—Optimizing PEEP To The IMMAture Lungs: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Application of two different nasal CPAP levels for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants—“The OPTTIMMAL-Trial”—Optimizing PEEP To The IMMAture Lungs: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Application of two different nasal CPAP levels for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants—“The OPTTIMMAL-Trial”—Optimizing PEEP To The IMMAture Lungs: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Application of two different nasal CPAP levels for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants—“The OPTTIMMAL-Trial”—Optimizing PEEP To The IMMAture Lungs: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | application of two different nasal cpap levels for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants—“the opttimmal-trial”—optimizing peep to the immature lungs: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7527266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32998769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04660-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waitzmarkus applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT engelcorinna applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schloesserrolf applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rochwalskyulrich applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT meyersascha applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zemlinmichael applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bohnhorstbettina applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT petercorinna applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hoppenzmarc applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pabstthomas applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zimmerklauspeter applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT franzaxelr applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ehrhardtharald applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schmidtannesuse applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT larsenalexander applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hoffmannpaul applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT haertelchristoph applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT frieaufferic applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sandkotterjulia applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT masjosthusmannkatja applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT deindlphilipp applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT singerdominique applicationoftwodifferentnasalcpaplevelsforthetreatmentofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfantstheopttimmaltrialoptimizingpeeptotheimmaturelungsstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial |