Cargando…

Comparing coal phase-out pathways: The United Kingdom’s and Germany’s diverging transitions

Political decisions and trends regarding coal use for electricity generation developed differently in the UK and Germany, despite being subject to relatively similar climate protection targets and general political and economic conditions. The UK agreed on a coal phase-out by 2024. In Germany, a law...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brauers, Hanna, Oei, Pao-Yu, Walk, Paula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7527286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33020728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.09.001
_version_ 1783589023343706112
author Brauers, Hanna
Oei, Pao-Yu
Walk, Paula
author_facet Brauers, Hanna
Oei, Pao-Yu
Walk, Paula
author_sort Brauers, Hanna
collection PubMed
description Political decisions and trends regarding coal use for electricity generation developed differently in the UK and Germany, despite being subject to relatively similar climate protection targets and general political and economic conditions. The UK agreed on a coal phase-out by 2024. In Germany, a law schedules a coal phase-out by 2038 at the latest. This paper investigates reasons for the different developments and aims to identify main hurdles and drivers of coal phase-outs by using the Triple Embeddedness Framework. The comparative case study approach reveals that policy outcomes regarding coal consumption are deeply influenced by several actor groups, namely, coal companies, unions, environmental NGOs, and the government. The most discussed aspects of a coal phase-out in both countries are energy security concerns, whether coal is mined domestically, (regional) economic dependence, as well as the relative power of actors with vested interests in coal consumption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7527286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75272862020-10-01 Comparing coal phase-out pathways: The United Kingdom’s and Germany’s diverging transitions Brauers, Hanna Oei, Pao-Yu Walk, Paula Environ Innov Soc Transit Article Political decisions and trends regarding coal use for electricity generation developed differently in the UK and Germany, despite being subject to relatively similar climate protection targets and general political and economic conditions. The UK agreed on a coal phase-out by 2024. In Germany, a law schedules a coal phase-out by 2038 at the latest. This paper investigates reasons for the different developments and aims to identify main hurdles and drivers of coal phase-outs by using the Triple Embeddedness Framework. The comparative case study approach reveals that policy outcomes regarding coal consumption are deeply influenced by several actor groups, namely, coal companies, unions, environmental NGOs, and the government. The most discussed aspects of a coal phase-out in both countries are energy security concerns, whether coal is mined domestically, (regional) economic dependence, as well as the relative power of actors with vested interests in coal consumption. The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020-12 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7527286/ /pubmed/33020728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.09.001 Text en © 2020 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Brauers, Hanna
Oei, Pao-Yu
Walk, Paula
Comparing coal phase-out pathways: The United Kingdom’s and Germany’s diverging transitions
title Comparing coal phase-out pathways: The United Kingdom’s and Germany’s diverging transitions
title_full Comparing coal phase-out pathways: The United Kingdom’s and Germany’s diverging transitions
title_fullStr Comparing coal phase-out pathways: The United Kingdom’s and Germany’s diverging transitions
title_full_unstemmed Comparing coal phase-out pathways: The United Kingdom’s and Germany’s diverging transitions
title_short Comparing coal phase-out pathways: The United Kingdom’s and Germany’s diverging transitions
title_sort comparing coal phase-out pathways: the united kingdom’s and germany’s diverging transitions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7527286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33020728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.09.001
work_keys_str_mv AT brauershanna comparingcoalphaseoutpathwaystheunitedkingdomsandgermanysdivergingtransitions
AT oeipaoyu comparingcoalphaseoutpathwaystheunitedkingdomsandgermanysdivergingtransitions
AT walkpaula comparingcoalphaseoutpathwaystheunitedkingdomsandgermanysdivergingtransitions