Cargando…
Interpreting, analysing and modelling COVID-19 mortality data
We present results on the mortality statistics of the COVID-19 epidemic in a number of countries. Our data analysis suggests classifying countries in five groups, (1) Western countries, (2) East Block, (3) developed Southeast Asian countries, (4) Northern Hemisphere developing countries and (5) Sout...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7527427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33020681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-05966-z |
_version_ | 1783589053555277824 |
---|---|
author | Sornette, Didier Mearns, Euan Schatz, Michael Wu, Ke Darcet, Didier |
author_facet | Sornette, Didier Mearns, Euan Schatz, Michael Wu, Ke Darcet, Didier |
author_sort | Sornette, Didier |
collection | PubMed |
description | We present results on the mortality statistics of the COVID-19 epidemic in a number of countries. Our data analysis suggests classifying countries in five groups, (1) Western countries, (2) East Block, (3) developed Southeast Asian countries, (4) Northern Hemisphere developing countries and (5) Southern Hemisphere countries. Comparing the number of deaths per million inhabitants, a pattern emerges in which the Western countries exhibit the largest mortality rate. Furthermore, comparing the running cumulative death tolls as the same level of outbreak progress in different countries reveals several subgroups within the Western countries and further emphasises the difference between the five groups. Analysing the relationship between deaths per million and life expectancy in different countries, taken as a proxy of the preponderance of elderly people in the population, a main reason behind the relatively more severe COVID-19 epidemic in the Western countries is found to be their larger population of elderly people, with exceptions such as Norway and Japan, for which other factors seem to dominate. Our comparison between countries at the same level of outbreak progress allows us to identify and quantify a measure of efficiency of the level of stringency of confinement measures. We find that increasing the stringency from 20 to 60 decreases the death count by about 50 lives per million in a time window of 20 days. Finally, we perform logistic equation analyses of deaths as a means of tracking the dynamics of outbreaks in the “first wave” and estimating the associated ultimate mortality, using four different models to identify model error and robustness of results. This quantitative analysis allows us to assess the outbreak progress in different countries, differentiating between those that are at a quite advanced stage and close to the end of the epidemic from those that are still in the middle of it. This raises many questions in terms of organisation, preparedness, governance structure and so on. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11071-020-05966-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7527427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75274272020-10-01 Interpreting, analysing and modelling COVID-19 mortality data Sornette, Didier Mearns, Euan Schatz, Michael Wu, Ke Darcet, Didier Nonlinear Dyn Original Paper We present results on the mortality statistics of the COVID-19 epidemic in a number of countries. Our data analysis suggests classifying countries in five groups, (1) Western countries, (2) East Block, (3) developed Southeast Asian countries, (4) Northern Hemisphere developing countries and (5) Southern Hemisphere countries. Comparing the number of deaths per million inhabitants, a pattern emerges in which the Western countries exhibit the largest mortality rate. Furthermore, comparing the running cumulative death tolls as the same level of outbreak progress in different countries reveals several subgroups within the Western countries and further emphasises the difference between the five groups. Analysing the relationship between deaths per million and life expectancy in different countries, taken as a proxy of the preponderance of elderly people in the population, a main reason behind the relatively more severe COVID-19 epidemic in the Western countries is found to be their larger population of elderly people, with exceptions such as Norway and Japan, for which other factors seem to dominate. Our comparison between countries at the same level of outbreak progress allows us to identify and quantify a measure of efficiency of the level of stringency of confinement measures. We find that increasing the stringency from 20 to 60 decreases the death count by about 50 lives per million in a time window of 20 days. Finally, we perform logistic equation analyses of deaths as a means of tracking the dynamics of outbreaks in the “first wave” and estimating the associated ultimate mortality, using four different models to identify model error and robustness of results. This quantitative analysis allows us to assess the outbreak progress in different countries, differentiating between those that are at a quite advanced stage and close to the end of the epidemic from those that are still in the middle of it. This raises many questions in terms of organisation, preparedness, governance structure and so on. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11071-020-05966-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2020-10-01 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7527427/ /pubmed/33020681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-05966-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Sornette, Didier Mearns, Euan Schatz, Michael Wu, Ke Darcet, Didier Interpreting, analysing and modelling COVID-19 mortality data |
title | Interpreting, analysing and modelling COVID-19 mortality data |
title_full | Interpreting, analysing and modelling COVID-19 mortality data |
title_fullStr | Interpreting, analysing and modelling COVID-19 mortality data |
title_full_unstemmed | Interpreting, analysing and modelling COVID-19 mortality data |
title_short | Interpreting, analysing and modelling COVID-19 mortality data |
title_sort | interpreting, analysing and modelling covid-19 mortality data |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7527427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33020681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-05966-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sornettedidier interpretinganalysingandmodellingcovid19mortalitydata AT mearnseuan interpretinganalysingandmodellingcovid19mortalitydata AT schatzmichael interpretinganalysingandmodellingcovid19mortalitydata AT wuke interpretinganalysingandmodellingcovid19mortalitydata AT darcetdidier interpretinganalysingandmodellingcovid19mortalitydata |