Cargando…

Contact lenses, the reverse Pulfrich effect, and anti-Pulfrich monovision corrections

Interocular differences in image blur can cause processing speed differences that lead to dramatic misperceptions of the distance and three-dimensional direction of moving objects. This recently discovered illusion—the reverse Pulfrich effect—is caused by optical conditions induced by monovision, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodriguez-Lopez, Victor, Dorronsoro, Carlos, Burge, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7527565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32999323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71395-y
_version_ 1783589085138386944
author Rodriguez-Lopez, Victor
Dorronsoro, Carlos
Burge, Johannes
author_facet Rodriguez-Lopez, Victor
Dorronsoro, Carlos
Burge, Johannes
author_sort Rodriguez-Lopez, Victor
collection PubMed
description Interocular differences in image blur can cause processing speed differences that lead to dramatic misperceptions of the distance and three-dimensional direction of moving objects. This recently discovered illusion—the reverse Pulfrich effect—is caused by optical conditions induced by monovision, a common correction for presbyopia. Fortunately, anti-Pulfrich monovision corrections, which darken the blurring lens, can eliminate the illusion for many viewing conditions. However, the reverse Pulfrich effect and the efficacy of anti-Pulfrich corrections have been demonstrated only with trial lenses. This situation should be addressed, for clinical and scientific reasons. First, it is important to replicate these effects with contact lenses, the most common method for delivering monovision. Second, trial lenses of different powers, unlike contacts, can cause large magnification differences between the eyes. To confidently attribute the reverse Pulfrich effect to interocular optical blur differences, and to ensure that previously reported effect sizes are reliable, one must control for magnification. Here, in a within-observer study with five separate experiments, we demonstrate that (1) contact lenses and trial lenses induce indistinguishable reverse Pulfrich effects, (2) anti-Pulfrich corrections are equally effective when induced by contact and trial lenses, and (3) magnification differences do not cause or impact the Pulfrich effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7527565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75275652020-10-02 Contact lenses, the reverse Pulfrich effect, and anti-Pulfrich monovision corrections Rodriguez-Lopez, Victor Dorronsoro, Carlos Burge, Johannes Sci Rep Article Interocular differences in image blur can cause processing speed differences that lead to dramatic misperceptions of the distance and three-dimensional direction of moving objects. This recently discovered illusion—the reverse Pulfrich effect—is caused by optical conditions induced by monovision, a common correction for presbyopia. Fortunately, anti-Pulfrich monovision corrections, which darken the blurring lens, can eliminate the illusion for many viewing conditions. However, the reverse Pulfrich effect and the efficacy of anti-Pulfrich corrections have been demonstrated only with trial lenses. This situation should be addressed, for clinical and scientific reasons. First, it is important to replicate these effects with contact lenses, the most common method for delivering monovision. Second, trial lenses of different powers, unlike contacts, can cause large magnification differences between the eyes. To confidently attribute the reverse Pulfrich effect to interocular optical blur differences, and to ensure that previously reported effect sizes are reliable, one must control for magnification. Here, in a within-observer study with five separate experiments, we demonstrate that (1) contact lenses and trial lenses induce indistinguishable reverse Pulfrich effects, (2) anti-Pulfrich corrections are equally effective when induced by contact and trial lenses, and (3) magnification differences do not cause or impact the Pulfrich effect. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7527565/ /pubmed/32999323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71395-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Rodriguez-Lopez, Victor
Dorronsoro, Carlos
Burge, Johannes
Contact lenses, the reverse Pulfrich effect, and anti-Pulfrich monovision corrections
title Contact lenses, the reverse Pulfrich effect, and anti-Pulfrich monovision corrections
title_full Contact lenses, the reverse Pulfrich effect, and anti-Pulfrich monovision corrections
title_fullStr Contact lenses, the reverse Pulfrich effect, and anti-Pulfrich monovision corrections
title_full_unstemmed Contact lenses, the reverse Pulfrich effect, and anti-Pulfrich monovision corrections
title_short Contact lenses, the reverse Pulfrich effect, and anti-Pulfrich monovision corrections
title_sort contact lenses, the reverse pulfrich effect, and anti-pulfrich monovision corrections
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7527565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32999323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71395-y
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezlopezvictor contactlensesthereversepulfricheffectandantipulfrichmonovisioncorrections
AT dorronsorocarlos contactlensesthereversepulfricheffectandantipulfrichmonovisioncorrections
AT burgejohannes contactlensesthereversepulfricheffectandantipulfrichmonovisioncorrections