Cargando…

RIPASA and air scoring systems are superior to alvarado scoring in acute appendicitis: Diagnostic accuracy study

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis remains difficult-to-diagnose in spite of being a common acute abdominal condition. Early and correct diagnosis is essential either to proceed with early appendectomy or conservative approach so that complications and negative explorations can be minimised. Scoring sys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chisthi, Meer M., Surendran, Anilkumar, Narayanan, Jiju Therumpurathu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7527659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.029
_version_ 1783589104572694528
author Chisthi, Meer M.
Surendran, Anilkumar
Narayanan, Jiju Therumpurathu
author_facet Chisthi, Meer M.
Surendran, Anilkumar
Narayanan, Jiju Therumpurathu
author_sort Chisthi, Meer M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis remains difficult-to-diagnose in spite of being a common acute abdominal condition. Early and correct diagnosis is essential either to proceed with early appendectomy or conservative approach so that complications and negative explorations can be minimised. Scoring systems can help in quick diagnosis and decision making. Though the Alvarado scoring is the widely used system, differences in diagnostic accuracy have been observed when it is applied to varied populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The objective was to find the predictive accuracy of Modified Alvarado score, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response score and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis score, in a diagnostic test evaluation study. From first January 2018 to first January 2019, 107 consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of suspected appendicitis were assessed with these scores. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratio and area under curve were determined for each. RESULTS: Negative appendicectomy rate was 15.89%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were 64.44%, 58.82%, 89.23%, 23.81% and 63.55% respectively for Modified Alvarado; 97.78%, 29.41%, 88%, 71.43% and 86.92% respectively for Appendicitis Inflammatory Response; 87.78%, 76.47%, 95.18%, 54.17% and 85.98% respectively for Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis. Area under the curve was 0.726797 for Modified Alvarado, 0.946732 for Appendicitis Inflammatory Response and 0.910131 for Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis. CONCLUSION: Appendicitis Inflammatory Response score probably is superior to Alvarado in the paediatric population because the variables scored are easy to apply to children, while Alvarado requires children to identify subjective symptoms which may not always be accurate. Appendicitis Inflammatory Response and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis are better diagnostic scoring system for acute appendicitis than Modified Alvarado. Also, both these scores can be easily calculated by complete history, detailed clinical examination and basic laboratory investigations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7527659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75276592020-10-05 RIPASA and air scoring systems are superior to alvarado scoring in acute appendicitis: Diagnostic accuracy study Chisthi, Meer M. Surendran, Anilkumar Narayanan, Jiju Therumpurathu Ann Med Surg (Lond) Diagnostic Study BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis remains difficult-to-diagnose in spite of being a common acute abdominal condition. Early and correct diagnosis is essential either to proceed with early appendectomy or conservative approach so that complications and negative explorations can be minimised. Scoring systems can help in quick diagnosis and decision making. Though the Alvarado scoring is the widely used system, differences in diagnostic accuracy have been observed when it is applied to varied populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The objective was to find the predictive accuracy of Modified Alvarado score, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response score and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis score, in a diagnostic test evaluation study. From first January 2018 to first January 2019, 107 consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of suspected appendicitis were assessed with these scores. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratio and area under curve were determined for each. RESULTS: Negative appendicectomy rate was 15.89%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were 64.44%, 58.82%, 89.23%, 23.81% and 63.55% respectively for Modified Alvarado; 97.78%, 29.41%, 88%, 71.43% and 86.92% respectively for Appendicitis Inflammatory Response; 87.78%, 76.47%, 95.18%, 54.17% and 85.98% respectively for Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis. Area under the curve was 0.726797 for Modified Alvarado, 0.946732 for Appendicitis Inflammatory Response and 0.910131 for Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis. CONCLUSION: Appendicitis Inflammatory Response score probably is superior to Alvarado in the paediatric population because the variables scored are easy to apply to children, while Alvarado requires children to identify subjective symptoms which may not always be accurate. Appendicitis Inflammatory Response and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis are better diagnostic scoring system for acute appendicitis than Modified Alvarado. Also, both these scores can be easily calculated by complete history, detailed clinical examination and basic laboratory investigations. Elsevier 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7527659/ /pubmed/33024555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.029 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Diagnostic Study
Chisthi, Meer M.
Surendran, Anilkumar
Narayanan, Jiju Therumpurathu
RIPASA and air scoring systems are superior to alvarado scoring in acute appendicitis: Diagnostic accuracy study
title RIPASA and air scoring systems are superior to alvarado scoring in acute appendicitis: Diagnostic accuracy study
title_full RIPASA and air scoring systems are superior to alvarado scoring in acute appendicitis: Diagnostic accuracy study
title_fullStr RIPASA and air scoring systems are superior to alvarado scoring in acute appendicitis: Diagnostic accuracy study
title_full_unstemmed RIPASA and air scoring systems are superior to alvarado scoring in acute appendicitis: Diagnostic accuracy study
title_short RIPASA and air scoring systems are superior to alvarado scoring in acute appendicitis: Diagnostic accuracy study
title_sort ripasa and air scoring systems are superior to alvarado scoring in acute appendicitis: diagnostic accuracy study
topic Diagnostic Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7527659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.029
work_keys_str_mv AT chisthimeerm ripasaandairscoringsystemsaresuperiortoalvaradoscoringinacuteappendicitisdiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT surendrananilkumar ripasaandairscoringsystemsaresuperiortoalvaradoscoringinacuteappendicitisdiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT narayananjijutherumpurathu ripasaandairscoringsystemsaresuperiortoalvaradoscoringinacuteappendicitisdiagnosticaccuracystudy