Cargando…

Anosognosia in dementia: A review of current assessment instruments

INTRODUCTION: Anosognosia is a common but underrated symptom in dementia and has significant impact on both patients and caregivers. A proper evaluation of anosognosia is therefore desirable. There are three common methods to determine anosognosia: (1) clinical rating, (2) patient‐caregiver discrepa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Ruijter, Naomi S., Schoonbrood, Anne M.G., van Twillert, Björn, Hoff, Erik I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7527687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12079
_version_ 1783589109677162496
author de Ruijter, Naomi S.
Schoonbrood, Anne M.G.
van Twillert, Björn
Hoff, Erik I.
author_facet de Ruijter, Naomi S.
Schoonbrood, Anne M.G.
van Twillert, Björn
Hoff, Erik I.
author_sort de Ruijter, Naomi S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Anosognosia is a common but underrated symptom in dementia and has significant impact on both patients and caregivers. A proper evaluation of anosognosia is therefore desirable. There are three common methods to determine anosognosia: (1) clinical rating, (2) patient‐caregiver discrepancies, and (3) prediction of performance discrepancies. Each of them includes different instruments. This review gives an overview of the current instruments used for the assessment of anosognosia in patients with dementia and aims to determine the most suitable instrument for routine use in clinical practice. METHODS: A search of the literature in PubMed was performed. Furthermore, electronic databases (PsycINFo, ClinicalKey, and Cochrane Library) and reference lists were searched for additional articles. RESULTS: Forty‐six articles were included in this study, comprising 10 clinical rating instruments, 25 patient‐caregiver discrepancy instruments, and 14 prediction‐performance discrepancy instruments. For every publication, the aims of the study, the included population, the assessment instrument used, the assessed domains, and the psychometric properties of the assessment instruments are described. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there is no consensus on the most suitable method to determine anosognosia in dementia. We recommend the Clinical Insight Rating scale and the Abridged Anosognosia Questionnaire—Dementia as the most appropriate for routine use in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7527687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75276872020-10-05 Anosognosia in dementia: A review of current assessment instruments de Ruijter, Naomi S. Schoonbrood, Anne M.G. van Twillert, Björn Hoff, Erik I. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Cognitive & Behavioral Assessment INTRODUCTION: Anosognosia is a common but underrated symptom in dementia and has significant impact on both patients and caregivers. A proper evaluation of anosognosia is therefore desirable. There are three common methods to determine anosognosia: (1) clinical rating, (2) patient‐caregiver discrepancies, and (3) prediction of performance discrepancies. Each of them includes different instruments. This review gives an overview of the current instruments used for the assessment of anosognosia in patients with dementia and aims to determine the most suitable instrument for routine use in clinical practice. METHODS: A search of the literature in PubMed was performed. Furthermore, electronic databases (PsycINFo, ClinicalKey, and Cochrane Library) and reference lists were searched for additional articles. RESULTS: Forty‐six articles were included in this study, comprising 10 clinical rating instruments, 25 patient‐caregiver discrepancy instruments, and 14 prediction‐performance discrepancy instruments. For every publication, the aims of the study, the included population, the assessment instrument used, the assessed domains, and the psychometric properties of the assessment instruments are described. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there is no consensus on the most suitable method to determine anosognosia in dementia. We recommend the Clinical Insight Rating scale and the Abridged Anosognosia Questionnaire—Dementia as the most appropriate for routine use in clinical practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7527687/ /pubmed/33024810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12079 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Cognitive & Behavioral Assessment
de Ruijter, Naomi S.
Schoonbrood, Anne M.G.
van Twillert, Björn
Hoff, Erik I.
Anosognosia in dementia: A review of current assessment instruments
title Anosognosia in dementia: A review of current assessment instruments
title_full Anosognosia in dementia: A review of current assessment instruments
title_fullStr Anosognosia in dementia: A review of current assessment instruments
title_full_unstemmed Anosognosia in dementia: A review of current assessment instruments
title_short Anosognosia in dementia: A review of current assessment instruments
title_sort anosognosia in dementia: a review of current assessment instruments
topic Cognitive & Behavioral Assessment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7527687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12079
work_keys_str_mv AT deruijternaomis anosognosiaindementiaareviewofcurrentassessmentinstruments
AT schoonbroodannemg anosognosiaindementiaareviewofcurrentassessmentinstruments
AT vantwillertbjorn anosognosiaindementiaareviewofcurrentassessmentinstruments
AT hofferiki anosognosiaindementiaareviewofcurrentassessmentinstruments