Cargando…

Transpulmonary pressures in obese and non-obese COVID-19 ARDS

BACKGROUND: Data on respiratory mechanics of COVID-19 ARDS patients are scarce. Respiratory mechanics and response to positive expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be different in obese and non-obese patients. METHODS: We investigated esophageal pressure allowing determination of transpulmonary pressures...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mezidi, Mehdi, Daviet, Florence, Chabert, Paul, Hraiech, Sami, Bitker, Laurent, Forel, Jean-Marie, Yonis, Hodane, Gragueb, Ines, Dhelft, Francois, Papazian, Laurent, Richard, Jean-Christophe, Guervilly, Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7527784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33001320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00745-w
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Data on respiratory mechanics of COVID-19 ARDS patients are scarce. Respiratory mechanics and response to positive expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be different in obese and non-obese patients. METHODS: We investigated esophageal pressure allowing determination of transpulmonary pressures (PL ) and elastances (EL) during a decremental PEEP trial from 20 to 6 cm H(2)O in a cohort of COVID-19 ARDS patients. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were investigated, 8 obese and 7 non-obese patients. PEEP ≥ 16 cm H(2)O for obese patients and PEEP ≥10 cm H(2)O for non-obese patients were necessary to obtain positive expiratory P(L). Change of PEEP did not alter significantly ΔP(L) or elastances in obese patients. However, in non-obese patients lung EL  and ΔP(L) increased significantly with PEEP increase. Chest wall EL was not affected by PEEP variations in both groups.