Cargando…

The Anatase Phase of Nanotopography Titania with Higher Roughness Has Better Biocompatibility in Osteoblast Cell Morphology and Proliferation

Previous studies have concluded that surface-modified titanium oxide (titania, TiO(2)) surface properties promote osteoblast cell morphology and proliferation. To screen a suitable structured titania coating with the best biocompatibility to be used in dental implants, five titania films (two amorph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruan, Danping, Wu, Chunyun, Deng, Sinan, Zhang, Yu, Guan, Guoling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7527892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33029524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8032718
_version_ 1783589150678581248
author Ruan, Danping
Wu, Chunyun
Deng, Sinan
Zhang, Yu
Guan, Guoling
author_facet Ruan, Danping
Wu, Chunyun
Deng, Sinan
Zhang, Yu
Guan, Guoling
author_sort Ruan, Danping
collection PubMed
description Previous studies have concluded that surface-modified titanium oxide (titania, TiO(2)) surface properties promote osteoblast cell morphology and proliferation. To screen a suitable structured titania coating with the best biocompatibility to be used in dental implants, five titania films (two amorphous, one rutile, and two anatases) with different surfaces were successfully synthesized on polished titanium by radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering. We applied atomic force microscopy (AFM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) to depict the formulations. Furthermore, MC3T3-E1, the mouse osteoblast precursor cell, was used to assess cell proliferation and observe morphologic changes at the film surface. The data indicated that the overall number of MC3T3-E1 cells on anatase films was significantly higher as compared with cells on rutile and amorphous films. Meanwhile, the actin filaments of the cells grown on the anatase phase films were well defined and fully spread. In addition, the film with higher roughness had enhanced biocompatibility than that with lower roughness. The results showed that the crystal phase and titania coated roughness had a greater influence on the biocompatibility of nanostructured titania film. The higher the roughness of the anatase phase was, the better bioactivity for the morphology and proliferation of osteoblast. This is a good surface-modified biological material and may have a good application prospect in dental implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7527892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75278922020-10-06 The Anatase Phase of Nanotopography Titania with Higher Roughness Has Better Biocompatibility in Osteoblast Cell Morphology and Proliferation Ruan, Danping Wu, Chunyun Deng, Sinan Zhang, Yu Guan, Guoling Biomed Res Int Research Article Previous studies have concluded that surface-modified titanium oxide (titania, TiO(2)) surface properties promote osteoblast cell morphology and proliferation. To screen a suitable structured titania coating with the best biocompatibility to be used in dental implants, five titania films (two amorphous, one rutile, and two anatases) with different surfaces were successfully synthesized on polished titanium by radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering. We applied atomic force microscopy (AFM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) to depict the formulations. Furthermore, MC3T3-E1, the mouse osteoblast precursor cell, was used to assess cell proliferation and observe morphologic changes at the film surface. The data indicated that the overall number of MC3T3-E1 cells on anatase films was significantly higher as compared with cells on rutile and amorphous films. Meanwhile, the actin filaments of the cells grown on the anatase phase films were well defined and fully spread. In addition, the film with higher roughness had enhanced biocompatibility than that with lower roughness. The results showed that the crystal phase and titania coated roughness had a greater influence on the biocompatibility of nanostructured titania film. The higher the roughness of the anatase phase was, the better bioactivity for the morphology and proliferation of osteoblast. This is a good surface-modified biological material and may have a good application prospect in dental implants. Hindawi 2020-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7527892/ /pubmed/33029524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8032718 Text en Copyright © 2020 Danping Ruan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ruan, Danping
Wu, Chunyun
Deng, Sinan
Zhang, Yu
Guan, Guoling
The Anatase Phase of Nanotopography Titania with Higher Roughness Has Better Biocompatibility in Osteoblast Cell Morphology and Proliferation
title The Anatase Phase of Nanotopography Titania with Higher Roughness Has Better Biocompatibility in Osteoblast Cell Morphology and Proliferation
title_full The Anatase Phase of Nanotopography Titania with Higher Roughness Has Better Biocompatibility in Osteoblast Cell Morphology and Proliferation
title_fullStr The Anatase Phase of Nanotopography Titania with Higher Roughness Has Better Biocompatibility in Osteoblast Cell Morphology and Proliferation
title_full_unstemmed The Anatase Phase of Nanotopography Titania with Higher Roughness Has Better Biocompatibility in Osteoblast Cell Morphology and Proliferation
title_short The Anatase Phase of Nanotopography Titania with Higher Roughness Has Better Biocompatibility in Osteoblast Cell Morphology and Proliferation
title_sort anatase phase of nanotopography titania with higher roughness has better biocompatibility in osteoblast cell morphology and proliferation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7527892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33029524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8032718
work_keys_str_mv AT ruandanping theanatasephaseofnanotopographytitaniawithhigherroughnesshasbetterbiocompatibilityinosteoblastcellmorphologyandproliferation
AT wuchunyun theanatasephaseofnanotopographytitaniawithhigherroughnesshasbetterbiocompatibilityinosteoblastcellmorphologyandproliferation
AT dengsinan theanatasephaseofnanotopographytitaniawithhigherroughnesshasbetterbiocompatibilityinosteoblastcellmorphologyandproliferation
AT zhangyu theanatasephaseofnanotopographytitaniawithhigherroughnesshasbetterbiocompatibilityinosteoblastcellmorphologyandproliferation
AT guanguoling theanatasephaseofnanotopographytitaniawithhigherroughnesshasbetterbiocompatibilityinosteoblastcellmorphologyandproliferation
AT ruandanping anatasephaseofnanotopographytitaniawithhigherroughnesshasbetterbiocompatibilityinosteoblastcellmorphologyandproliferation
AT wuchunyun anatasephaseofnanotopographytitaniawithhigherroughnesshasbetterbiocompatibilityinosteoblastcellmorphologyandproliferation
AT dengsinan anatasephaseofnanotopographytitaniawithhigherroughnesshasbetterbiocompatibilityinosteoblastcellmorphologyandproliferation
AT zhangyu anatasephaseofnanotopographytitaniawithhigherroughnesshasbetterbiocompatibilityinosteoblastcellmorphologyandproliferation
AT guanguoling anatasephaseofnanotopographytitaniawithhigherroughnesshasbetterbiocompatibilityinosteoblastcellmorphologyandproliferation