Cargando…

Comparing preference of ankle–foot stiffness in below-knee amputees and prosthetists

When fitting prosthetic feet, prosthetists fuse information from their visual assessment of patient gait with the patient’s communicated perceptions and preferences. In this study, we sought to simultaneously and independently assess patient and prosthetist preference for prosthetic foot stiffness u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shepherd, Max K., Rouse, Elliott J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7527979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32999317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72131-2
_version_ 1783589167615180800
author Shepherd, Max K.
Rouse, Elliott J.
author_facet Shepherd, Max K.
Rouse, Elliott J.
author_sort Shepherd, Max K.
collection PubMed
description When fitting prosthetic feet, prosthetists fuse information from their visual assessment of patient gait with the patient’s communicated perceptions and preferences. In this study, we sought to simultaneously and independently assess patient and prosthetist preference for prosthetic foot stiffness using a custom variable-stiffness prosthesis. In the first part of the experiment, seven subjects with below-knee amputation walked on the variable-stiffness prosthetic foot set to a randomized stiffness, while several prosthetist subjects simultaneously observed their gait. After each trial, the amputee subjects and prosthetist subjects indicated the change to stiffness that they would prefer (increase or decrease). This paradigm allowed us to simultaneously measure amputee subject and prosthetist subject preferences, and provided a reliability index indicating the consistency of their preferences. In the second part of the experiment, amputee subjects were instructed to communicate verbally with one prosthetist subject to arrive at a mutually preferred stiffness. On average, prosthetist subjects preferred a 26% higher stiffness than amputee subjects (p < 0.001), though this depended on the amputee subject (p < 0.001). Prosthetist subjects were also considerably less consistent than amputee subjects in their preferences (CV of 5.6% for amputee subjects, CV of 23% for prosthetist subjects; p = 0.014). Mutual preference seemed to be dictated by the specific patient-prosthetist dynamic, and no clear trends emerged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7527979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75279792020-10-02 Comparing preference of ankle–foot stiffness in below-knee amputees and prosthetists Shepherd, Max K. Rouse, Elliott J. Sci Rep Article When fitting prosthetic feet, prosthetists fuse information from their visual assessment of patient gait with the patient’s communicated perceptions and preferences. In this study, we sought to simultaneously and independently assess patient and prosthetist preference for prosthetic foot stiffness using a custom variable-stiffness prosthesis. In the first part of the experiment, seven subjects with below-knee amputation walked on the variable-stiffness prosthetic foot set to a randomized stiffness, while several prosthetist subjects simultaneously observed their gait. After each trial, the amputee subjects and prosthetist subjects indicated the change to stiffness that they would prefer (increase or decrease). This paradigm allowed us to simultaneously measure amputee subject and prosthetist subject preferences, and provided a reliability index indicating the consistency of their preferences. In the second part of the experiment, amputee subjects were instructed to communicate verbally with one prosthetist subject to arrive at a mutually preferred stiffness. On average, prosthetist subjects preferred a 26% higher stiffness than amputee subjects (p < 0.001), though this depended on the amputee subject (p < 0.001). Prosthetist subjects were also considerably less consistent than amputee subjects in their preferences (CV of 5.6% for amputee subjects, CV of 23% for prosthetist subjects; p = 0.014). Mutual preference seemed to be dictated by the specific patient-prosthetist dynamic, and no clear trends emerged. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7527979/ /pubmed/32999317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72131-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Shepherd, Max K.
Rouse, Elliott J.
Comparing preference of ankle–foot stiffness in below-knee amputees and prosthetists
title Comparing preference of ankle–foot stiffness in below-knee amputees and prosthetists
title_full Comparing preference of ankle–foot stiffness in below-knee amputees and prosthetists
title_fullStr Comparing preference of ankle–foot stiffness in below-knee amputees and prosthetists
title_full_unstemmed Comparing preference of ankle–foot stiffness in below-knee amputees and prosthetists
title_short Comparing preference of ankle–foot stiffness in below-knee amputees and prosthetists
title_sort comparing preference of ankle–foot stiffness in below-knee amputees and prosthetists
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7527979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32999317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72131-2
work_keys_str_mv AT shepherdmaxk comparingpreferenceofanklefootstiffnessinbelowkneeamputeesandprosthetists
AT rouseelliottj comparingpreferenceofanklefootstiffnessinbelowkneeamputeesandprosthetists