Cargando…

Can (68)Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography provide an accurate lymph node staging for patients with medium/high risk prostate cancer? A diagnostic meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: This article aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of (68)Gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography/computerized tomography ((68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT) for lymph node (LN) staging in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) by a meta-analysis of diagnostic tests. METHODS: We systematically retrieved...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Lei, Li, Jinze, Meng, Chunyang, Li, Jinming, You, Chengyu, Tang, Dandan, Wei, Tangqiang, Xiong, Wei, Li, Yunxiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7528481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33004037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01675-4
_version_ 1783589270070493184
author Peng, Lei
Li, Jinze
Meng, Chunyang
Li, Jinming
You, Chengyu
Tang, Dandan
Wei, Tangqiang
Xiong, Wei
Li, Yunxiang
author_facet Peng, Lei
Li, Jinze
Meng, Chunyang
Li, Jinming
You, Chengyu
Tang, Dandan
Wei, Tangqiang
Xiong, Wei
Li, Yunxiang
author_sort Peng, Lei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This article aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of (68)Gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography/computerized tomography ((68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT) for lymph node (LN) staging in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) by a meta-analysis of diagnostic tests. METHODS: We systematically retrieved articles from Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, PubMed. The time limit is from the creation of the database until June 2019, and Stata 15 was used for calculation and statistical analyses. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR, NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) be used to evaluate the diagnostic value. A total of 10 studies were included in our meta-analysis, which included 701 individuals. The results of each consolidated summary are as follows: sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.55–0.95), specificity of 0.95 (95% CI 0.87–0.98), PLR and NLR was 17.19 (95% CI 6.27, 47.17) and 0.17 (95% CI 0.05–0.56), respectively. DOR of 100 (95% CI 18–545), AUC of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.98). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT has a high overall diagnostic value for LN staging in patients with moderate and high-risk PCa. But our conclusions still require a larger sample size, multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial to verify.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7528481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75284812020-10-02 Can (68)Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography provide an accurate lymph node staging for patients with medium/high risk prostate cancer? A diagnostic meta-analysis Peng, Lei Li, Jinze Meng, Chunyang Li, Jinming You, Chengyu Tang, Dandan Wei, Tangqiang Xiong, Wei Li, Yunxiang Radiat Oncol Research OBJECTIVE: This article aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of (68)Gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography/computerized tomography ((68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT) for lymph node (LN) staging in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) by a meta-analysis of diagnostic tests. METHODS: We systematically retrieved articles from Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, PubMed. The time limit is from the creation of the database until June 2019, and Stata 15 was used for calculation and statistical analyses. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR, NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) be used to evaluate the diagnostic value. A total of 10 studies were included in our meta-analysis, which included 701 individuals. The results of each consolidated summary are as follows: sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.55–0.95), specificity of 0.95 (95% CI 0.87–0.98), PLR and NLR was 17.19 (95% CI 6.27, 47.17) and 0.17 (95% CI 0.05–0.56), respectively. DOR of 100 (95% CI 18–545), AUC of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.98). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT has a high overall diagnostic value for LN staging in patients with moderate and high-risk PCa. But our conclusions still require a larger sample size, multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial to verify. BioMed Central 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7528481/ /pubmed/33004037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01675-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Peng, Lei
Li, Jinze
Meng, Chunyang
Li, Jinming
You, Chengyu
Tang, Dandan
Wei, Tangqiang
Xiong, Wei
Li, Yunxiang
Can (68)Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography provide an accurate lymph node staging for patients with medium/high risk prostate cancer? A diagnostic meta-analysis
title Can (68)Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography provide an accurate lymph node staging for patients with medium/high risk prostate cancer? A diagnostic meta-analysis
title_full Can (68)Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography provide an accurate lymph node staging for patients with medium/high risk prostate cancer? A diagnostic meta-analysis
title_fullStr Can (68)Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography provide an accurate lymph node staging for patients with medium/high risk prostate cancer? A diagnostic meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Can (68)Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography provide an accurate lymph node staging for patients with medium/high risk prostate cancer? A diagnostic meta-analysis
title_short Can (68)Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography provide an accurate lymph node staging for patients with medium/high risk prostate cancer? A diagnostic meta-analysis
title_sort can (68)ga-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography provide an accurate lymph node staging for patients with medium/high risk prostate cancer? a diagnostic meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7528481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33004037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01675-4
work_keys_str_mv AT penglei can68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputerizedtomographyprovideanaccuratelymphnodestagingforpatientswithmediumhighriskprostatecanceradiagnosticmetaanalysis
AT lijinze can68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputerizedtomographyprovideanaccuratelymphnodestagingforpatientswithmediumhighriskprostatecanceradiagnosticmetaanalysis
AT mengchunyang can68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputerizedtomographyprovideanaccuratelymphnodestagingforpatientswithmediumhighriskprostatecanceradiagnosticmetaanalysis
AT lijinming can68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputerizedtomographyprovideanaccuratelymphnodestagingforpatientswithmediumhighriskprostatecanceradiagnosticmetaanalysis
AT youchengyu can68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputerizedtomographyprovideanaccuratelymphnodestagingforpatientswithmediumhighriskprostatecanceradiagnosticmetaanalysis
AT tangdandan can68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputerizedtomographyprovideanaccuratelymphnodestagingforpatientswithmediumhighriskprostatecanceradiagnosticmetaanalysis
AT weitangqiang can68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputerizedtomographyprovideanaccuratelymphnodestagingforpatientswithmediumhighriskprostatecanceradiagnosticmetaanalysis
AT xiongwei can68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputerizedtomographyprovideanaccuratelymphnodestagingforpatientswithmediumhighriskprostatecanceradiagnosticmetaanalysis
AT liyunxiang can68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputerizedtomographyprovideanaccuratelymphnodestagingforpatientswithmediumhighriskprostatecanceradiagnosticmetaanalysis